|
Post by saltin on Nov 11, 2015 20:03:18 GMT
The forums discuss ww1,ww2 and hypothetical ww3 on a fairly regular basis since it has the same theme as Easytech war games more or less. This has always been done in good taste and in good gaming spirit and without any prejudice or disrespect to any nation or to any group of people and so as long as it stays objective and without any heavy politics,propaganda or hate these posts and threads are perfectly acceptable and comply with the community rules.
If you feel any post or thread is offensive to you or insn't in compliance with the forum rules,please do not moderate yourself just send me or any of the staff a private message (or use the report function) and let us know of the issue.
|
|
|
Post by Philip II of Macedon on Nov 11, 2015 21:56:34 GMT
Welcome back cccp though.
|
|
|
Post by saltin on Nov 12, 2015 9:02:59 GMT
^That too,of course welcome back,the more of us,the better!
Btw and this goes to everyone, if any of you guys feel something is not right with posts you see you are very welcome to send me a note but you must explain why you feel what you read was wrong.It may very well be that I might agree with you.I have in the past taken action and even added new rules if there were complaints that had legitimate ground.
So any issues,send me a private message and be specific at explaining the problem and I can see what can be done.
Anyways back on topic, I honestly don't think we can have military conquest winners in a modern world full of nukes.No major power will allow itself to be crushed militarily, it's pretty much guaranteed that they will all use nukes.
Peace is here to stay because there is no possibility of victory.Victory being define in a traditional non-insane way. There is even a name for this,during the cold war it was called M.A.D Mutually Assured Destruction.
Technology could potentially change this in the future though.
|
|
|
Post by waltermodel on Nov 27, 2015 12:47:36 GMT
so i guess russia allies: kazakhstan, iraq, belarus china allies: INDIA (!), mongolia, indonesia, north korea, vietnam, thailand ill go for china because of india nato countries all got a terrible army. look at what they did in ww2. the most countries just surrended in a small amount of time India with PRC as allies? That's the newest opinion I've heard on PRC's allies. India... would probably stay neutral or take sides with UK. Thailand would probably stand with PRC, as would Vietnam. NATO isn't that shabby around a decade and a half ago, though later on it could've been worse than it is now. Indonesia would probably stand with the Arabic or the Islamic world as we've the most Muslim population in the world. Indonesia probably doesn't like China/PRC too much as we have a pretty bad history with communists because the majority of Indonesians still perceive Russia and PRC as communists while the USA is perceived a capitalist hoarder.
|
|
|
Post by Philip II of Macedon on Nov 27, 2015 13:26:44 GMT
Quite frankly china has no allied. All of sea hates them, because they are trying to agressively expand. China doesn't trust North Korea, and a significant portion of the country would probably rebel if given half a chance (Tibet, Hong Kong, etc).
|
|
|
Post by CCCPball on Nov 28, 2015 19:38:51 GMT
So I'd assume from that logic Alyaska would join Russia, Venice would become independent, Galicia would become independent, Kurdistan would become independent, and Texas join Mexico if given the chance.
|
|
|
Post by Philip II of Macedon on Nov 28, 2015 21:23:17 GMT
No? Google tibetan immolations (NSFL) if you want to here what im talking about. Texas and Alaska have no rebellions. Tibet and certain other provinces do.
|
|
|
Post by NetherFreek on Nov 28, 2015 21:43:22 GMT
only kurdistan could rebel from them, galicia maybe dont want to be a part of spain, but they still like it more than allying with russia.
in russia tsjetsjenia could rebel in china tibet could rebel and maybe manchuria, but manchuria is the same as galicia, they feel a bit underrated but they want to be allies with china
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Nov 29, 2015 7:38:16 GMT
In Pakistan, no one wants to rebel
|
|
|
Post by Suvorov on Nov 29, 2015 13:06:14 GMT
only kurdistan could rebel from them, galicia maybe dont want to be a part of spain, but they still like it more than allying with russia. in russia tsjetsjenia could rebel in china tibet could rebel and maybe manchuria, but manchuria is the same as galicia, they feel a bit underrated but they want to be allies with china FSB+Spetsnaz Alpha=R.I.P. Chechenia
|
|
|
Post by Suvorov on Nov 29, 2015 13:06:37 GMT
In Pakistan, no one wants to rebel In the Netherlands, no one wants to fight or face reality
|
|
|
Post by NetherFreek on Nov 29, 2015 13:31:58 GMT
only kurdistan could rebel from them, galicia maybe dont want to be a part of spain, but they still like it more than allying with russia. in russia tsjetsjenia could rebel in china tibet could rebel and maybe manchuria, but manchuria is the same as galicia, they feel a bit underrated but they want to be allies with china FSB+Spetsnaz Alpha=R.I.P. Chechenia ehm... should i understand this
|
|
|
Post by Suvorov on Nov 29, 2015 13:37:23 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 2, 2015 10:26:06 GMT
russia and china are allies? Yes they are. Russia has the most nukes and tanks, China has the biggest conventional army. Together, they are quite unstoppable China and India are on their own sides
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Dec 3, 2015 3:39:49 GMT
Many Americans (I should say people from NATO countries) don't know how good relations between Russia and China are. The real question is which side they would join in a world war.
|
|