|
|
Post by lassalle on Oct 29, 2015 1:48:39 GMT
Holy smokes! 17 and more pages threads on these wars.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Oct 30, 2015 3:28:20 GMT
A rule that needs to be added is to limit overseas capability. It should at least take 2 turns to ship a moderate army overseas. It's kind of annoying that you can cross the Atlantic Ocean with a massive invasion force in the same time that it takes to move from one city to the next.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Oct 30, 2015 3:29:20 GMT
A rule that needs to be added is to limit overseas capability. It should at least take 2 turns to ship a moderate army overseas. It's kind of annoying that you can cross the Atlantic Ocean with a massive invasion force in the same time that it takes to move from one city to the next. Only if there's punishments for breaking treaties. |
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Oct 30, 2015 9:42:32 GMT
That's a stupid rule. Breaking treaties and siding with countries is part of war. And you want to take that away.
|
|
|
|
Post by General William T. Sherman on Oct 30, 2015 18:36:16 GMT
I agree that it should take two turns to cross a water way, and if you're attacking a river, the defender gets a defensive bonus.
Breaking Non-Agression Treaties...fine, we'll have punishments :/
What's your idea of punishment though?
|
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Oct 30, 2015 18:38:38 GMT
If there is a punishment then that's like joining a side anyway.
|
|
|
|
Post by Moreau on Oct 31, 2015 14:03:48 GMT
I agree that it should take two turns to cross a water way, and if you're attacking a river, the defender gets a defensive bonus. Breaking Non-Agression Treaties...fine, we'll have punishments :/ What's your idea of punishment though? Lets say France betrays Germany the germans will hate the french the german people will fight better because their hate against France |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Oct 31, 2015 21:41:15 GMT
I agree that it should take two turns to cross a water way, and if you're attacking a river, the defender gets a defensive bonus. Breaking Non-Agression Treaties...fine, we'll have punishments :/ What's your idea of punishment though? Lets say France betrays Germany the germans will hate the french the german people will fight better because their hate against France I like this, a morale boost. |
|
|
|
Post by General William T. Sherman on Oct 31, 2015 21:42:46 GMT
Soooo...when is the next war going to get started?
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Oct 31, 2015 21:45:08 GMT
Soooo...when is the next war going to get started? Maybe 12:00? Because then most people would be awake. The guys in the US and the ones in the Netherlands. |
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Oct 31, 2015 21:45:50 GMT
People need to choose countries
|
|
|
|
Post by General William T. Sherman on Oct 31, 2015 21:48:38 GMT
Soooo...when is the next war going to get started? Maybe 12:00? Because then most people would be awake. The guys in the US and the ones in the Netherlands. Nah man, not the time. Plus, I think 3:00 PM is probs better. I'm wondering when people will choose countries. Seems like everyone chose C.Powers...nothing wrong with though because GERMANIA SHALL CONQUER ALL!!!! |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Oct 31, 2015 21:56:05 GMT
Maybe 12:00? Because then most people would be awake. The guys in the US and the ones in the Netherlands. Nah man, not the time. Plus, I think 3:00 PM is probs better. I'm wondering when people will choose countries. Seems like everyone chose C.Powers...nothing wrong with though because GERMANIA SHALL CONQUER ALL!!!! At 3PM people in the US and in Europe can easily do things but not really in China (it's +8:30 there(according to the government)) I find 3:00PM better though because it's closer to when school ends  |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Nov 4, 2015 4:36:57 GMT
I got an idea. Maybe we should make a chat for the theoretical wars. General William T. Sherman will host the first one and invite everyone he thinks should be in it. If someone violates rules or causes BS like in the last thread that person is kicked from the chat. This would also lower the total post count (like mine would be alot less). |
|
|
|
Post by Haelicon on Nov 4, 2015 6:48:46 GMT
I think, to prevent OP turns, we need to state manpower and equipment used in a counterattack or attack.
As: Germany strikes Moscow with 400.000 attackers armed with MP-40 (or the tech, advanced submachine guns) and Pz. IV H(advanced medium tank). Soviets defend with 2.000.000 defender, armed with PPsH and T34. This is clearly a lose for the Germans.
The weapons used is the tech researched. So if you haven't researched Jet fighters, you can't use Me 262, etc.
If you have 2 fronts, you will have less soldiers and equipment on each front.
You could only conscript 50% (this is a lot) of your overall citizens.
A Lend-Lease from other country to you means you could use their equipment too in your forces, like Britain could use M4A1 Shermans.
|
|
