|
|
Post by sacredelbrus on Nov 22, 2017 0:06:18 GMT
Do you think there will be extra content added to the game in the future? By content I mean medals that boost other skills or even having the ability to obtain duplicates of currently owned medals. Easytech could also add the Terrorist generals too which would no doubt earn them extra cash. I've already ascended to the top of the game with the best generals and it's still a very fun experience. New content consistently brought out would keep the game fresh and elongate its longevity.
The strategy Ubisoft is employing with rainbow six siege with consistently updating and adding new things to the game ensures popularity and is a good business strategy if anything.
|
|
|
|
Post by lopicko on Nov 22, 2017 0:45:46 GMT
Nope I think it is the end of the updates. ET wouldn't stop at a game for too long.  |
|
|
|
Post by best75 on Nov 22, 2017 1:53:09 GMT
Judging from their pervious games I don't think easytech will update this game anymore. They will be focusing on making their next game.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Conqueror on Dec 18, 2017 15:26:03 GMT
.org/]  [/url] best75, sacredelbrus, lopicko,What about this In the Modern War Scenario we have 9 normal missions and 9 hard missions so... |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Dec 18, 2017 16:01:33 GMT
It is an old information. You have to update the game. |
|
|
|
Post by best75 on Dec 18, 2017 21:37:11 GMT
best75 , sacredelbrus , lopicko ,What about this In the Modern War Scenario we have 9 normal missions and 9 hard missions so... Its a oversight or bug. Once you update the game the number will change to 9 |
|
|
|
Post by Der Kommandeur on Jan 5, 2018 5:24:58 GMT
They could have added a lot of generals too as there are many that you only see in the conquests like Novikov, Olav and Brauchitsch. I will never understand the reason for they being in the game but not being hirable.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nobunaga Oda on Jan 5, 2018 10:42:51 GMT
They could have added a lot of generals too as there are many that you only see in the conquests like Novikov, Olav and Brauchitsch. I will never understand the reason for they being in the game but not being hirable. Maybe they tried to decrease no. of gens since players who see the full roster may get confused on who to buy or how to proceed. |
|
|
|
Post by judea48 on Feb 2, 2018 19:13:07 GMT
I would like to see more of Scandinavia, Africa and South America with playable nations to match. Rather boring to play the UK, France, Italy and Spain in Africa, why not add actual African nations. ET won't though why should they.....This game is becoming more frustrating and NOT enjoyable at all
|
|
|
|
Post by leetowvorbeck on Feb 6, 2018 12:38:19 GMT
How about an actual and proper diplomacy? Or at least a competent allied AI, btw shout out to how enemy AI has improved so much in this game, in WC3 world conquer with Poland in 1939 was pretty doable, here without generals and good tech you'll get slaughtered.
|
|
|
|
Post by Wilhelm Ritter von Leeb on Feb 6, 2018 13:18:45 GMT
How about an actual and proper diplomacy? Or at least a competent allied AI, btw shout out to how enemy AI has improved so much in this game, in WC3 world conquer with Poland in 1939 was pretty doable, here without generals and good tech you'll get slaughtered. Diplomacy would only improve in a new game. The allied AI is meant to be stupid, for the sake of difficulty. If you are playing as 1943 Cuba, for example, and Germany gets wrecked by the USSR in the first 30 turns it isn't fun. You are always the most important country, the one that will save the day, assuming you are capable of that. |
|
|
|
Post by leetowvorbeck on Feb 6, 2018 14:05:42 GMT
How about an actual and proper diplomacy? Or at least a competent allied AI, btw shout out to how enemy AI has improved so much in this game, in WC3 world conquer with Poland in 1939 was pretty doable, here without generals and good tech you'll get slaughtered. Diplomacy would only improve in a new game. The allied AI is meant to be stupid, for the sake of difficulty. If you are playing as 1943 Cuba, for example, and Germany gets wrecked by the USSR in the first 30 turns it isn't fun. You are always the most important country, the one that will save the day, assuming you are capable of that. Well nor is it fun to watch the Germans drown all their best generals in 1939 conquest when playing as Japan or to watch Japan fail to even take Peiking without losing all their starting generals and army while playing as Finland. |
|
|
|
Post by Wilhelm Ritter von Leeb on Feb 6, 2018 14:56:26 GMT
Diplomacy would only improve in a new game. The allied AI is meant to be stupid, for the sake of difficulty. If you are playing as 1943 Cuba, for example, and Germany gets wrecked by the USSR in the first 30 turns it isn't fun. You are always the most important country, the one that will save the day, assuming you are capable of that. Well nor is it fun to watch the Germans drown all their best generals in 1939 conquest when playing as Japan or to watch Japan fail to even take Peiking without losing all their starting generals and army while playing as Finland. But that's the point of the game. If there was a possibility to win without doing anything, the strategy factor is eliminated. Watching all your allies die might be rage inducing, but it is better when it comes to, gameplay. |
|
|
|
Post by Nobunaga Oda on Feb 7, 2018 9:05:57 GMT
Possibly ET might adjust the AI difficulty again, to make allied AI better since quite a few players disliked the greatly nerfed allied AI "intelligence".
|
|
