|
|
Post by Iron Duke on Nov 27, 2017 14:22:27 GMT
Does anyone know how the rankings of your generals works?
According to mine my Barbarossa (level 25, 1159 HP, 289 attack, 110 defence) is apparently better than my Lincoln (level 40, 1480 HP, 352 attack, 151 defence).
|
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Nov 27, 2017 19:23:51 GMT
Does anyone know how the rankings of your generals works? According to mine my Barbarossa (level 25, 1159 HP, 289 attack, 110 defence) is apparently better than my Lincoln (level 40, 1480 HP, 352 attack, 151 defence). No logic in AI's ranking at all. I remember Nobunaga was between Cath and Robin  Maybe there is some kind of logic behind all that, but I'm sure that human beings unable to understand it |
|
|
|
Post by best75 on Nov 27, 2017 20:43:09 GMT
Does anyone know how the rankings of your generals works? According to mine my Barbarossa (level 25, 1159 HP, 289 attack, 110 defence) is apparently better than my Lincoln (level 40, 1480 HP, 352 attack, 151 defence). Barbarossa is ranked higher due to him being purple general. I am not sure how much it factors in the ranking but I noticed it and that stats do effect the ranking as their rank goes down when I removed equipment from a general. |
|
|
|
Post by Iron Duke on Nov 28, 2017 12:50:41 GMT
Does anyone know how the rankings of your generals works? According to mine my Barbarossa (level 25, 1159 HP, 289 attack, 110 defence) is apparently better than my Lincoln (level 40, 1480 HP, 352 attack, 151 defence). Barbarossa is ranked higher due to him being purple general. I am not sure how much it factors in the ranking but I noticed it and that stats do effect the ranking as their rank goes down when I removed equipment from a general. That makes sense, I guess it must have some weight in the complex algorithm that only ET understands. Btw when you guys talk about gold & purple generals etc how do you arrive at the classification? Is it just the background colour of their icons? |
|
|
|
Post by Nobunaga Oda on Nov 28, 2017 15:25:22 GMT
Barbarossa is ranked higher due to him being purple general. I am not sure how much it factors in the ranking but I noticed it and that stats do effect the ranking as their rank goes down when I removed equipment from a general. That makes sense, I guess it must have some weight in the complex algorithm that only ET understands. Btw when you guys talk about gold & purple generals etc how do you arrive at the classification? Is it just the background colour of their icons? Yes, it's by background colours. Their base stats are tied to their colours. Starting with the weakest Grey, then Blue, Purple & lastly, Gold, the "strongest" type of gen. |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Nov 28, 2017 18:55:27 GMT
But what I like about EW5 is the fact that a straightforward strategy - to buy all golden generals and win the game - doesn't work here. In EW5 you really need a team to be successful (and not just collection of generals). To be honest it is a rare exception in ET games. In other projects (like WC) it is very difficult to be creative because list of names for the final lineup is really limited.
|
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Nov 28, 2017 19:03:17 GMT
But what I like about EW5 is the fact that a straightforward strategy - to buy all golden generals and win the game - doesn't work here. In EW5 you really need a team to be successful (and not just collection of generals). To be honest it is a rare exception in ET games. In other projects (like WC) it is very difficult to be creative because list of names for the final lineup is really limited. Synergy for the generals they have invented in EW5 is awesome. In WC series (huge map, a lot of enemies) it is almost impossible to use it particularly in conquests. A lot of players will say: "It is too challenging!" |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Nov 28, 2017 19:58:33 GMT
But what I like about EW5 is the fact that a straightforward strategy - to buy all golden generals and win the game - doesn't work here. In EW5 you really need a team to be successful (and not just collection of generals). To be honest it is a rare exception in ET games. In other projects (like WC) it is very difficult to be creative because list of names for the final lineup is really limited. Synergy for the generals they have invented in EW5 is awesome. In WC series (huge map, a lot of enemies) it is almost impossible to use it particularly in conquests. A lot of players will say: "It is too challenging!" That's true. But there are dozens of generals in WC whose names are unknown to majority of players simply because they never even consider to hire them (and for the right reason!). 3 Art generals(including Zhukov), a couple of Inf generals (chances you will use them are low anyway), a couple of Navy generals - that's all we really have in WC. The situation is slightly better with tank generals. The rest are either weak or have a bizarre combination of skills. The same was in WC3 and EW4. But as we know there are 15 different generals in final lineups in EW5. 15!!! And I'm sure there are other decent candidates (Blucher or Lionheart among others, for example)... |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Nov 29, 2017 10:20:11 GMT
Back to the main question... Look at the place of Nobunaga in the ranking. I have no theories to explain his place... .org/]  [/url] |
|
|
|
Post by Nobunaga Oda on Nov 29, 2017 10:55:36 GMT
Back to the main question... Look at the place of Nobunaga in the ranking. I have no theories to explain his place... Am I even upgraded in any way & what equipment do I have? |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Nov 29, 2017 11:11:46 GMT
Back to the main question... Look at the place of Nobunaga in the ranking. I have no theories to explain his place... Am I even upgraded in any way & what equipment do I have? In this image gallery all generals are presented fully upgraded but without any equipment. |
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Nov 29, 2017 11:30:37 GMT
ET - chinese company. Nobunaga - japanise general |
|
|
|
Post by Iron Duke on Nov 29, 2017 12:40:56 GMT
Am I even upgraded in any way & what equipment do I have? In this image gallery all generals are presented fully upgraded but without any equipment. What are his stats in this presentation? Is it possible he was one of the first to have his equipment removed and the lineup just hasn't been refreshed, so to speak? |
|
|
|
Post by Nobunaga Oda on Nov 29, 2017 12:42:50 GMT
ET - chinese company. Nobunaga - japanise general Shingen is ahead & he's also Japanese |
|
|
|
Post by dain on Nov 29, 2017 13:13:22 GMT
Maybe the total number of medals used to upgrade skills is also considered. Nobunaga's Spy and Leadership are quite "cheap", whereas commander skill, armor expert/master, defense expert/master, or general/marshal are more expensive.
|
|
Maybe there is some kind of logic behind all that, but I'm sure that human beings unable to understand it 
