|
|
Post by Wilhelm Ritter von Leeb on Jan 11, 2018 21:42:42 GMT
If everyone wants to play another round of Forum Mafia that will hopefully progress, we could. I wouldn't mind being the GM. I am in. But I think the problem this time was that we had too many people join in (and some of them were inactive, busy, etc). The first mafia worked because we were just a few members, there were no such problems. Note: This is just my opinion, if you disagree feel free to say so. |
|
|
|
Post by liamcog on Jan 11, 2018 21:56:40 GMT
If everyone wants to play another round of Forum Mafia that will hopefully progress, we could. I wouldn't mind being the GM. definitely |
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Jan 11, 2018 22:26:59 GMT
I was a... Townie. Pretty much
|
|
|
|
Post by The Light Bringer on Jan 12, 2018 0:21:34 GMT
RIP
|
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Jan 12, 2018 5:02:08 GMT
If everyone wants to play another round of Forum Mafia that will hopefully progress, we could. I wouldn't mind being the GM. I am in. But I think the problem this time was that we had too many people join in (and some of them were inactive, busy, etc). The first mafia worked because we were just a few members, there were no such problems. Note: This is just my opinion, if you disagree feel free to say so. I think it is the key to success if we want not only to start the game but to finish it as well  . Nothing on earth can persuade me to participate in such projects if I'm busy in RL or have serious plans for the near future. |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Jan 12, 2018 5:07:59 GMT
4 members of Mafia can already disbalance the gameplay. But 5!!! It is more than a third of all players. I don't think that even in Palermo a percentage is that high Taking into account that some townsmen only nominally participated, - we never had a chance in this game, to be honest... Nevertheless, I'm in as well... |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 12, 2018 5:11:43 GMT
4 members of Mafia can already disbalance the gameplay. But 5!!! It is more than a third of all players. I don't think that even in Palermo a percentage is that high Taking into account that some townsmen only nominally participated, - we never had a chance in this game, to be honest... Nevertheless, I'm in as well... And we're not taking in serial killer... too many. |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Jan 12, 2018 5:22:27 GMT
4 members of Mafia can already disbalance the gameplay. But 5!!! It is more than a third of all players. I don't think that even in Palermo a percentage is that high Taking into account that some townsmen only nominally participated, - we never had a chance in this game, to be honest... Nevertheless, I'm in as well... And we're not taking in serial killer... too many. I wonder who it might be |
|
|
|
Post by Wilhelm Ritter von Leeb on Jan 12, 2018 12:31:43 GMT
4 members of Mafia can already disbalance the gameplay. But 5!!! It is more than a third of all players. I don't think that even in Palermo a percentage is that high Taking into account that some townsmen only nominally participated, - we never had a chance in this game, to be honest... Nevertheless, I'm in as well... And there is the traitor. That makes them 6! |
|
|
|
Post by NetherFreek on Jan 12, 2018 12:55:50 GMT
As for the new one, i would love to see voting deadlines (a day could last 2 days, a night could last 1 day for instance).
If not voted by then, we will progress without your vote. This way the game will go through with the one with the most votes hanged (or mayor).
This way it's ensured the game will keep progressing.
|
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Jan 12, 2018 14:17:05 GMT
As for the new one, i would love to see voting deadlines (a day could last 2 days, a night could last 1 day for instance). If not voted by then, we will progress without your vote. This way the game will go through with the one with the most votes hanged (or mayor). This way it's ensured the game will keep progressing. And the electric chair used by the GM if the voting is indecisive or not even progressing. |
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Jan 12, 2018 20:18:47 GMT
As for the new one, i would love to see voting deadlines (a day could last 2 days, a night could last 1 day for instance). If not voted by then, we will progress without your vote. This way the game will go through with the one with the most votes hanged (or mayor). This way it's ensured the game will keep progressing. If I am the GM there will definitely be a deadline. The game should not last beyond a month. |
|
|
|
Post by best75 on Jan 13, 2018 20:16:16 GMT
Looks like everyone has had their last words here so I will be locking this.
|
|
. Nothing on earth can persuade me to participate in such projects if I'm busy in RL or have serious plans for the near future.
