|
Post by Louis Gabriel Suchet on Jan 25, 2018 20:07:55 GMT
Please tell me I am not the only one who thinks this...
|
|
|
Post by liamcog on Jan 25, 2018 23:41:19 GMT
I did but I'm really glad I tried it
|
|
|
Post by Der Kommandeur on Jan 26, 2018 1:41:52 GMT
No way, WC4 is better than WC3 in every aspect imo.
|
|
|
Post by Max Otto von Stierlitz on Jan 26, 2018 5:16:44 GMT
Initially I thought WC4 is notably worse than WC3. Now I see it's not so, overall they are quite equal. Each game has its good and bad sides. Most problem of WC4 is that even without IAPs and long farming you don't need to figure out some special strategy. Most of levels you clear from 1st or 2nd try using some more or less straightforward strategy. But good side of WC4 is that it is has more levels than WC3, normal and hard modes are more different, in domination battles you can choose which troops to use, landmarks and tech level also give some new strategy elements, too bad in most cases you don't have to use them to win.
|
|
|
Post by Cyrus the Great on Feb 12, 2018 3:23:12 GMT
I must admit, WC4 has a lot of things inherited from ew5. For example, the city menu in conquest looks exactly the same in ew5.
landmarks are like princesses in ew5, except you can build as much as you want and costs money. The domination mode is mixed between wc3 and ew5. The wonders and city colors are from wc3, and things like the invasions are kinda from ew5.
The tech bar at the top is similar to developing to new ages in ew5, in conquest.
|
|
|
Post by War Master on Feb 12, 2018 3:37:27 GMT
wc4 has more elements than wc3.
|
|