|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Nov 4, 2015 0:42:47 GMT
Please note that I mean what system of balance would you like to see.
|
|
|
|
Post by thetundrafox on Nov 4, 2015 14:07:16 GMT
Of course i would like having Super over 8000 OP Generals but that would just ruin the game. I think that the current balance is good so voting on that
|
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Nov 4, 2015 14:50:32 GMT
ET has more experience with their current system so I would like to keep it that way.
|
|
|
|
Post by best75 on Nov 5, 2015 4:58:26 GMT
I see generals as being quite powerful and would like to see no generals or the generals being weaker in the next game.
|
|
|
|
Post by Freeloader on Nov 5, 2015 5:12:15 GMT
I think Having generals is good to give us goals to achieve, such as medals and stuff. It also adds to more to the story of your exploits rather than just mindless men you send wave after wave into the meat grinder.
|
|
|
|
Post by António Salazar on Nov 5, 2015 8:49:52 GMT
I think in the next game players must be able to faster take out a general, however having generals in conquest in WC3 means nothing. 1 nuke and poof gone is Guderian. Also add multiplayer!!!! But make the multiplayer balanced, not pay 2 win.
|
|
|
|
Post by NetherFreek on Nov 5, 2015 10:28:23 GMT
I think in the next game players must be able to faster take out a general, however having generals in conquest in WC3 means nothing. 1 nuke and poof gone is Guderian. Also add multiplayer!!!! But make the multiplayer balanced, not pay 2 win. in multiplayer everybody got no generals and everybody got the same technology. so that isnt pay to win |
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Nov 5, 2015 10:40:50 GMT
I think in the next game players must be able to faster take out a general, however having generals in conquest in WC3 means nothing. 1 nuke and poof gone is Guderian. Also add multiplayer!!!! But make the multiplayer balanced, not pay 2 win. in multiplayer everybody got no generals and everybody got the same technology. so that isnt pay to win Yeah they should just give you the basic generals from the country. So if you choose France then you get the generals that you would have in conquest from the start. Or they could do a system where you can add tier 1 generals after turn 10, tier 2 after 30, and tier 3 after 50. |
|
