|
|
Post by opinionmaker on Jul 22, 2019 18:00:02 GMT
I wish I was as educated on this all as him. I’m just a history nerd and thats about it. I could go on and on about rome though, thats the topic I know the most about and poured countless hours into learning about. WW2 has always been interesting to me in terms of the wars and tactics themselves though  |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 22, 2019 18:41:12 GMT
The west always viewed war differently from the east. The east viewed war as something to obtain an objective, and saw it as a whole, and wasn't about winning battles but rather the whole war in the end, which includes what happens after the war. West viewed it as the parts, and saw it as winning the battle of attrition, and that is how the world War 2 was fought. If we viewed it in the perspective of the west, then yes, Germany and the Axis has a chance of winning the war if they didn't make military blunders and played their cards right. But, in terms of the Eastern way of viewing war, they would ultimately lost. Enraging the French, opening hostilities against the US, having ideals that would naturally make those of other nations despise them. It will not end well for them.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tito on Jul 23, 2019 8:45:48 GMT
well if the germans could have victory in the caucausus they could gain access to more resources, and if japan and germany defeated britain in iran they could gain more oil than the allies could, ensuring stronger defence and more troops They did break into/to the Caucasus, but every single oil field was sacked razed or destroyed in an anoter way by the Red army, so any land gain for the Germans results in fuel wasted and little gained |
|
