|
|
Post by General Winter on Nov 11, 2015 8:35:05 GMT
My point is that Leadership only does something when you have low morale. It removes the low morale. Therefore it is only used certain times (when you have low morale). Suvorov's 4 infantry skills take place every time he attack though, giving him 4 constant skills while Lannes has a circumstantial one and a nearly useless one. Leadership is always on whenever it contacts with the enemy same thing with Mass fire etc So That Jean Lannes can never have 2 eagles down |
|
|
|
Post by General Winter on Nov 11, 2015 8:39:20 GMT
I think Leadership is important for Jean Lannes.. considiring that cavalry charges evades morale. Also on Campaigns you can have limited food which can drop morale... except for Lannes who has Leadership. .. sure you can capture farms but that will take time and waste time. Also if Lannes is cornered, he doesent get morale down or get the cloudy question mark. So really Geography ia the only.useless thing for Jean Lannes Speaking about campaigns... In case You have problems with food You need to get food. Lannes won't be able to smash all the enemies on the map. You normally need all Your generals with normal morale in order to win the mission. Second remark regarding encirclement of the infantry unit. You need to avoid it even though You have good morale as infantry is not a cavalry that could hit several times per turn and most likely be defeated when cirсled. So Leadership could of course be useful even for infantry but very very occasionally so other skills are much more preferable. Thats why you have Lannes to capture farms... |
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Nov 11, 2015 10:40:01 GMT
Speaking about campaigns... In case You have problems with food You need to get food. Lannes won't be able to smash all the enemies on the map. You normally need all Your generals with normal morale in order to win the mission. Second remark regarding encirclement of the infantry unit. You need to avoid it even though You have good morale as infantry is not a cavalry that could hit several times per turn and most likely be defeated when cirсled. So Leadership could of course be useful even for infantry but very very occasionally so other skills are much more preferable. Thats why you have Lannes to capture farms... That's funny  Before he can capture sufficient amount of farms other generals would be defeated ) Food supply anticipates planning of the campaign ahead. That's the first quesion of any war of that historical period. So I think it is very weak argument why You need Lannes. By the way I think Lannes is good enough, he probably was one of the best french generals but in the game his skills are not that valuable. He is good but as kanue said Suvorov, Victoria, Doebeln are much better generals. |
|
|
|
Post by Suvorov on Nov 11, 2015 13:55:56 GMT
And last question, any problem with my style? Just tell me. I put all the general analyses in one post. Dividing each general over 1 post , like you do, is also fine. If I would have done that, it would be very difficult to see the general you want to buy and it would produce tons of pages, which are very unhandy if you need only 1 general to look up. Also, there are 100 general analysed and that would make me instantly a marshall. With this anaylse, you can use ctrl+f to see the general you want. Anyway, there is nothing wrong with your style Erich von Manstein |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Nov 14, 2015 22:01:47 GMT
I am posting it to my Chinese forum. I will report how they responds to your analysis.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Nov 14, 2015 23:27:36 GMT
#31 You are going to pay for this Suvorov |
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Nov 14, 2015 23:40:14 GMT
#31 You are going to pay for this Suvorov I think you are taking it in the wrong context. |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Nov 15, 2015 0:01:55 GMT
Suvorov the Chinese players are coming!!! BE PREPARED!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Nov 15, 2015 0:32:15 GMT
Alright, it is a little bit hard for them to say the problems, so I'll post for them.
|
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Nov 15, 2015 3:55:21 GMT
I have to say that your analysis made such a grea~t impact in the Chinese forum, but I don't think you would like to hear that.
|
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Nov 15, 2015 10:06:50 GMT
I have to say that your analysis made such a grea~t impact in the Chinese forum, but I don't think you would like to hear that. but I would like too hear Note, if you don't want to post it then its fine ...... |
|
|
|
Post by Suvorov on Nov 15, 2015 12:24:24 GMT
I have to say that your analysis made such a grea~t impact in the Chinese forum, but I don't think you would like to hear that. I hope it's meant in a good way, but even if it's meant in a bad way, I'd still like to hear |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Nov 15, 2015 13:44:02 GMT
I have to say that your analysis made such a grea~t impact in the Chinese forum, but I don't think you would like to hear that. I hope it's meant in a good way, but even if it's meant in a bad way, I'd still like to hear They just feel that the knowledge about the game here should sort of be updated. |
|
|
|
Post by Suvorov on Nov 15, 2015 19:53:09 GMT
I hope it's meant in a good way, but even if it's meant in a bad way, I'd still like to hear They just feel that the knowledge about the game here should sort of be updated. Soooo. .. I should update the analysis? If so, I can start to upgrade my analysis |
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Nov 15, 2015 19:56:48 GMT
Hey Erich von Manstein why don't you ask the Chinese forum whether they think Lannes or Suvorov is better? It's nice to get multiple opinions. |
|
