The bad generals who people think are good
Dec 23, 2018 14:18:26 GMT
via mobile
Sun liren likes this
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Dec 23, 2018 14:18:26 GMT
2. Drummond sadly has the skill “Ballistics” which is useless (does absolutely nothing, I think broken is the correct term. This means that ney on artillery is a bit better. And you already do have Sophia. But still, there are far worse generals.
3. Definitely. I like the both of them. There movement is a bit slow at first but definitely something you can fix.
2.sadly for belsford, he have logistics, which is bad unless you playing hard conquest (cough cough... 1815 Serbia)
Btw both of your list are awesome and detail indeed
btw why you said Sidney is overrated?
Sidney has both steersman and navigation, making him quite good on navy. However, he has no land ability. Furthermore the princess Kate exists who is better than him, victoria and ushakov who have land ability, and even generals such as savary are not significantly worse. In my opinion, while he is good, there is not much of a reason to buy him, even if you have an extra slot available.
Logistics >>> mobility, infantry tactics, and ballistics. Of all of them, Cornplanter moves the fastest and has the best attack overall. Infantry Trainer is kind of a bit of investment, but I definitely agree. Unless you have more than 4 slots you won’t need it. Good catch.
