|
|
Post by Vatutin on Nov 15, 2015 19:33:11 GMT
It says you can violate the NAP now so what's wrong? I don't want to get technical but I will now Sherman just said it is not tolerated anyone and it (CLEARLY SAID SECOND PART) |
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Nov 15, 2015 19:33:39 GMT
And right before that he said we can attack now but in the future it won't be tolerated. But the NAP is now optional. And I chose the option of breaking it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vatutin on Nov 15, 2015 19:33:56 GMT
Finland: 1,2) Attack St. Petersburg. Finnish soldiers and armored division attack the Soviets. Navy: N/A Army: Finland still has a stronger army. 6 Air: Equal. No effect. Fortress lines: none built by Soviets. Final number:6 PGaNtfOa·Ur army is smashed to pieces |
|
|
|
Post by General William T. Sherman on Nov 15, 2015 19:35:12 GMT
Okay Vatutin, they can advance so far into you because that is what happens. You now get a huge bonus when they reach Minsk. After they take Minsk, you gain +3.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vatutin on Nov 15, 2015 19:36:07 GMT
And right before that he said we can attack now but in the future it won't be tolerated. But the NAP is now optional. And I chose the option of breaking it. the Finns broke off right after he said NOT to plus in the Finnish attack I wiped out a good part of the Finnish army since I got 12 |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Nov 15, 2015 19:37:26 GMT
And right before that he said we can attack now but in the future it won't be tolerated. But the NAP is now optional. And I chose the option of breaking it. the Finns broke off right after he said NOT to plus in the Finnish attack I wiped out a good part of the Finnish army since I got 12 I was already at war with you so I didn't violate anything. |
|
|
|
Post by Vatutin on Nov 15, 2015 19:37:52 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Vatutin on Nov 15, 2015 19:38:11 GMT
the Finns broke off right after he said NOT to plus in the Finnish attack I wiped out a good part of the Finnish army since I got 12 I was already at war with you so I didn't violate anything. That was not a war it was just an event |
|
|
|
Post by General William T. Sherman on Nov 15, 2015 19:38:35 GMT
Okay, clearly no one is winning right now. If I say you guys have to wait another round, Mountbatten gets pissed. If I say you can start now, Vatutin gets pissed. Quite frankly, I'm sick of this now. FOLLOW WHAT WE SAY OR ELSE YOULL BE KICKED. I'm tired of giving compromises, either you agree or you can't play. I don't want to do this but it's the only way.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vatutin on Nov 15, 2015 19:40:10 GMT
[Briefing] 1941 has come. the bears will be awakened. One on the 22 of June, the other on 7 December. [Briefing]
Let me clear up some things:
-Japan and Allies keep their NAP this year.
-USSR and Axis can keep their NAP, however this NAP can be violated.
-Netherlands have to chose between a NAP that can be violated at any time or taking sides with the Allies
-Germany now has 1 elite army in Africa
Events:
-Building errors: A build costs 1 turn extra
-Large invasion +1 attack
-ATTACK YOUR OPPONENT. DO NOT BUILD BE BRAVE AND ATTACK.
-Technology gap remains. all technologies +1 turn.
Killing spree: 2-7 = no loss. 8 and 9= 1 army loss. 10 and 11= 2 armies loss. 12= 3 armies loss.
1 Killing spree in Southern-Netherlands. Germany attacks soldiers.
hi6Vk9ar
2 Killing spree in France against German soldiers
Volunteers spree: Goes the same as the killing spree but this time no armies are killed but built.
1 Volunteers spree in Hungary
2 Volunteers spree in Burma
······· Since people can not read the entire post I'll Post here again |
|
|
|
Post by Vatutin on Nov 15, 2015 19:41:16 GMT
Okay, clearly no one is winning right now. If I say you guys have to wait another round, Mountbatten gets pissed. If I say you can start now, Vatutin gets pissed. Quite frankly, I'm sick of this now. FOLLOW WHAT WE SAY OR ELSE YOULL BE KICKED. I'm tired of giving compromises, either you agree or you can't play. I don't want to do this but it's the only way. I'm sort of the wannabe some type historical thing and 15 turns vs 5 turns is too sad plus army build need +1 along with tech |
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Nov 15, 2015 19:40:58 GMT
I find my turns perfectly legitimate. He just keeps trying to invalidate them.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vatutin on Nov 15, 2015 19:43:05 GMT
I find my turns perfectly legitimate. He just keeps trying to invalidate them. I don't understand how it's legitimate because I rekt ur army with a 12 basically 3 armies of urs is gone |
|
|
|
Post by General William T. Sherman on Nov 15, 2015 19:43:34 GMT
Okay, well Vatutin, idk what to do with your turns. Please ask Talleyrand.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vatutin on Nov 15, 2015 19:44:49 GMT
Okay, well Vatutin, idk what to do with your turns. Please ask Talleyrand. I'm waiting on António Salazar for legitimately correct this is my last argument for this thread not being locked |
|
