|
|
Post by Vatutin on Nov 25, 2015 18:43:19 GMT
U guys are 1000 not fair so nope to the end
|
|
|
|
Post by Vatutin on Nov 25, 2015 18:44:13 GMT
How can Japan take so much and so little men meh
|
|
|
|
Post by Suvorov on Nov 25, 2015 18:45:56 GMT
Diplomacy things: 1) Germany offers the Netherlands the Wads if they promise to not have an army and stop rebellions 2) Germany offers the USSR the following thing: - Last offer was rejected and resulted in the fall of Moscow, Leningrad, Stalingrad and the rest of West-Russia
- Germany offers the USSR an armistice if they keep their army east of the Urals. This armistice can only be broken by Germany
- If the USSR rejects the offer or breaks the armistice all axis members will attack the USSR with 2 elite armies each.
- USSR reduces it's army
3) The Axis members offer the USA an armistice.
4) The Axis members offer Australia the following thing: Give us Australia or we will create a massacre 5) The Axis members offer the ROC an unconditional surrender 6) The Third Reich intimidates the UK. A 7 or lower means UK laughing at the Axis. p3CQSYpy7) UK intimidates Bulgaria. Or you'll create a massacre in Australia? Using war crimes as intimidation don't work with me. Thank you, but no way I'm going to give you Australia. Aussies love their lifestyle of crocodile wrestling, life by the beach and kangaroo-riding to their work too much to accept an armistice |
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Nov 25, 2015 18:58:43 GMT
You guys don't take your people's well being very seriously. If you were actually the leader of Australia, your citizens wouldn't stand for you throwing them into a war that they know you won't win. You are killing your people. I know surrender isn't the fun thing to do, but it's logical. Same for you Vatutin.
|
|
|
|
Post by Suvorov on Nov 25, 2015 19:09:23 GMT
You guys don't take your people's well being very seriously. If you were actually the leader of Australia, your citizens wouldn't stand for you throwing them into a war that they know you won't win. You are killing your people. I know surrender isn't the fun thing to do, but it's logical. Same for you Vatutin. I don't mind the surrendering part, I just don't like the massacre part. Killing soldiers in a war is logical( how can you otherwise win a war?) But threatening with murdering civilians in cold blood is something way more horrific than the killing of soldiers. |
|
|
|
Post by General William T. Sherman on Nov 25, 2015 19:12:11 GMT
The Japanese, having conquered so much land and becoming worried of possible axis intervention into Asia, offer the allies of the U.K. and the USA an armistice and an alliance.
Japanese Negotiations:
-Japan gains Burma, Indonesia, Malaya, the Philippines and Papua New Guinea.
-Japan gains Midway, the Aleutian Islands, and Hawaii.
-UK gains Goa.
-Japan will then join the war against Germany, Hungary, Italy, Bulgaria and Finland.
-Japan is still at war with China and Soviet Union
If you guys don't agree, modify these negotiations.
|
|
|
|
Post by General William T. Sherman on Nov 25, 2015 19:12:49 GMT
You guys don't take your people's well being very seriously. If you were actually the leader of Australia, your citizens wouldn't stand for you throwing them into a war that they know you won't win. You are killing your people. I know surrender isn't the fun thing to do, but it's logical. Same for you Vatutin. I don't mind the surrendering part, I just don't like the massacre part. Killing soldiers in a war is logical( how can you otherwise win a war?) But threatening with murdering civilians in cold blood is something way more horrific than the killing of soldiers. I, Japan, never stated I would massacre. |
|
|
|
Post by Suvorov on Nov 25, 2015 19:16:15 GMT
Anyways, please do not make this a hate thread again. Aussies will fight on their cangaroos, Japanese will continue to fight Aussies with their bayonets. Everything should go on like normal... I'm currently thinking about General William T. Sherman 's armistice |
|
|
|
Post by General William T. Sherman on Nov 25, 2015 19:18:22 GMT
Suvorov, do you agree to a temporary armistice while you contemplate the treaty?
|
|
|
|
Post by Suvorov on Nov 25, 2015 19:21:16 GMT
Suvorov , do you agree to a temporary armistice while you contemplate the treaty? You'll see the PM...  |
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Nov 25, 2015 19:22:43 GMT
You guys don't take your people's well being very seriously. If you were actually the leader of Australia, your citizens wouldn't stand for you throwing them into a war that they know you won't win. You are killing your people. I know surrender isn't the fun thing to do, but it's logical. Same for you Vatutin. I don't mind the surrendering part, I just don't like the massacre part. Killing soldiers in a war is logical( how can you otherwise win a war?) But threatening with murdering civilians in cold blood is something way more horrific than the killing of soldiers. I don't think he literally meant massacre. He just meant that you would suffer many casualties. |
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Nov 25, 2015 19:23:50 GMT
Wtf Japan can't just switch sides
|
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Nov 25, 2015 19:24:06 GMT
It's a main axis power.
|
|
|
|
Post by NetherFreek on Nov 25, 2015 19:25:06 GMT
i dont think it should be allowed for this war, but in the next war (cold war), i think it should be allowed.
|
|
|
|
Post by General William T. Sherman on Nov 25, 2015 19:27:49 GMT
Listen, i want this rp to continue, as it's just now getting interesting. Do you want to just mop up the U.K or end with a grand finale in either Berlin or Tokyo?
|
|
