muller1942
Major
King of Imperial Ostwynne
Posts: 172
|
Post by muller1942 on Nov 25, 2018 4:28:11 GMT
Almost done maxing out wilhelm
|
|
|
Post by Józef Poniatowski on Nov 29, 2018 13:04:38 GMT
Better than in EU4, but still not good enough.
|
|
muller1942
Major
King of Imperial Ostwynne
Posts: 172
|
Post by muller1942 on Dec 8, 2018 3:54:41 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Cyrus the Great on Feb 15, 2019 1:30:22 GMT
He looks good but there are better choices to use. 3 star
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 15, 2019 13:46:36 GMT
He looks good but there are better choices to use. 3 star 2 star. If he was a green general 3 star.
|
|
|
Post by Cyrus the Great on Feb 15, 2019 20:03:05 GMT
He looks good but there are better choices to use. 3 star 2 star. If he was a green general 3 star. Well he actually looks not bad upgraded. But idk if he is worth an end game slot. Or just a slot in general.
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Feb 15, 2019 20:29:16 GMT
2 star. If he was a green general 3 star. Well he actually looks not bad upgraded. But idk if he is worth an end game slot. Or just a slot in general. He is quite good. But plenty of better generals, such as Garibaldi or Bolivar that can do his job. Furthermore, his damage is good, but not great. Louise, Garibaldi, Bolivar, Massena, or Milos are better.
|
|
|
Post by Cyrus the Great on Feb 15, 2019 20:54:43 GMT
Well he actually looks not bad upgraded. But idk if he is worth an end game slot. Or just a slot in general. He is quite good. But plenty of better generals, such as Garibaldi or Bolivar that can do his job. Furthermore, his damage is good, but not great. Louise, Garibaldi, Bolivar, Massena, or Milos are better. I think that is 3 star worthy
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 16, 2019 0:32:48 GMT
He is quite good. But plenty of better generals, such as Garibaldi or Bolivar that can do his job. Furthermore, his damage is good, but not great. Louise, Garibaldi, Bolivar, Massena, or Milos are better. I think that is 3 star worthy The very definition of very slightly above average. 3.001 stars
|
|
|
Post by Cyrus the Great on Feb 16, 2019 0:43:22 GMT
I think that is 3 star worthy The very definition of very slightly above average. 3.001 stars How I rank it: 1 star - terrible 2 star - bad, but not terrible 3 star - meh/ok 4 star - good, can be slot worthy 5 star - Great general, definently a general you should use!
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 16, 2019 0:52:48 GMT
The very definition of very slightly above average. 3.001 stars How I rank it: 1 star - terrible 2 star - bad, but not terrible 3 star - meh/ok 4 star - good, can be slot worthy 5 star - Great general, definently a general you should use! 1 star- too powerful for the game 1.1 star - terrible 2 star - Has some redeeming qualities 3 star - Average 4 star - Powerful, but not enough 5 star - Rightful successors of the 1 star generals.
|
|
|
Post by Cyrus the Great on Feb 16, 2019 0:55:41 GMT
How I rank it: 1 star - terrible 2 star - bad, but not terrible 3 star - meh/ok 4 star - good, can be slot worthy 5 star - Great general, definently a general you should use! 1 star- too powerful for the game 1.1 star - terrible 2 star - Has some redeeming qualities 3 star - Average 4 star - Powerful, but not enough 5 star - Rightful successors of the 1 star generals. 4 star guys can be your slot, even if you have only 8 of them, like Garibaldi or Maria.
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Aug 23, 2019 19:35:42 GMT
He’s decent, but there are much better generals. 3 stars.
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 23, 2019 21:03:26 GMT
He’s decent, but there are much better generals. 3 stars. Like Louise for his price.
|
|
|
Post by SolidLight on Oct 4, 2019 19:30:34 GMT
One of the three heroes of Prussia 1798, the other ones being Blucher and Ludwig. He and Ludwig are an incredible team because they're both marshals and good siegers during that conquest.
Oh, fine. He's not recommended, just get Garibaldi. I'd rate him 3 stars if he wasn't so amazingly useful during that conquest. The same goes for Ludwig.
3 (base) + 2 (bias) = 5 stars.
|
|