the worser conquests of wc3
Nov 13, 2015 18:44:00 GMT
via mobile
saltin, kanue, and 1 more like this
Post by NetherFreek on Nov 13, 2015 18:44:00 GMT
opposite of the better conquests of wc3:
for the ones that think south korea was a piece of cake
my list:
1939 (allies losing)
*:
belgium
only one city but two of the strongest german generals heading towards you!
**:
australia
when you finally join the battlefield the axis has won already!
***:
france
even if your able to defeat the germans. you still got spain
1943: (axis losing)
*:
hungary
far away from the battlefield and enemy cities. and when russia finally decide to conquer you. your army cant even resist the soviets.
**:
france
only 1 city of 1 in the beginning. seriously? you got a lot of generals. but germany will damage them. even if you win. your stuck in africa that supplies to little recourses to beat the germans that has conquerd the whole eurasia.
***:
usa
bad generals, little troops and when you finaly managed your army. the germans will parakill them.
1950
*:
mmm the hardes decision of them all.... ill go south korea (whuttt?!? )
**:
mexico/brazil
far away from the battlefield. but you cant resist the russians if they get to you. however, if you escape through africa towards the middle east. you are in a good position
***
usa:
its hard to settle in asia. and in europe. the battlefield is far away.
1960:
*
south korea
dunno why...
**
brazil:
too lazy to explain again...
***
germany:
directly confrontate the biggest country in the world!
1975:
*
japan:
only one small city in the beginning. lots of aliens in china thus nearby you. and it wouldnt be that bad. if that tower couldnt reach your town
**:
australia.
small recourses inside south east asia and the islands. too smal for me....
***:
china.
lots of towns that cant recrute artillery
the towns are also sparsely spread which makes it very annoying
for the ones that think south korea was a piece of cake
my list:
1939 (allies losing)
*:
belgium
only one city but two of the strongest german generals heading towards you!
**:
australia
when you finally join the battlefield the axis has won already!
***:
france
even if your able to defeat the germans. you still got spain
1943: (axis losing)
*:
hungary
far away from the battlefield and enemy cities. and when russia finally decide to conquer you. your army cant even resist the soviets.
**:
france
only 1 city of 1 in the beginning. seriously? you got a lot of generals. but germany will damage them. even if you win. your stuck in africa that supplies to little recourses to beat the germans that has conquerd the whole eurasia.
***:
usa
bad generals, little troops and when you finaly managed your army. the germans will parakill them.
1950
*:
mmm the hardes decision of them all.... ill go south korea (whuttt?!?
)**:
mexico/brazil
far away from the battlefield. but you cant resist the russians if they get to you. however, if you escape through africa towards the middle east. you are in a good position
***
usa:
its hard to settle in asia. and in europe. the battlefield is far away.
1960:
*
south korea
dunno why...
**
brazil:
too lazy to explain again...
***
germany:
directly confrontate the biggest country in the world!
1975:
*
japan:
only one small city in the beginning. lots of aliens in china thus nearby you. and it wouldnt be that bad. if that tower couldnt reach your town
**:
australia.
small recourses inside south east asia and the islands. too smal for me....
***:
china.
lots of towns that cant recrute artillery
the towns are also sparsely spread which makes it very annoying
