|
|
Post by Vatutin on Dec 25, 2015 1:54:13 GMT
Lannes I have a question. What happens when I regroup lannes into suvorov? then you did a big mistake. becuase you bought both of them. Why would you buy both of them? It's a waste of money -_- u didn't get the point I wanted to kill lannes so what better way then killing him and taking his knowledge and putting in suvorov |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Dec 25, 2015 2:15:46 GMT
then you did a big mistake. becuase you bought both of them. Why would you buy both of them? It's a waste of money -_- u didn't get the point I wanted to kill lannes so what better way then killing him and taking his knowledge and putting in suvorov So you're pretty much saying that Lannes had more knowledge than Suvorov that's why you gave his knowledge to Suvorov. Anyway, we should do a separate thread for this |
|
|
|
Post by Vatutin on Dec 25, 2015 2:38:49 GMT
-_- u didn't get the point I wanted to kill lannes so what better way then killing him and taking his knowledge and putting in suvorov So you're pretty much saying that Lannes had more knowledge than Suvorov that's why you gave his knowledge to Suvorov. Anyway, we should do a separate thread for this Anyway vatutin(tanks)>lannes(tanks) Lannes(inf)>vatutin(inf) |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Dec 25, 2015 5:47:45 GMT
So you're pretty much saying that Lannes had more knowledge than Suvorov that's why you gave his knowledge to Suvorov. Anyway, we should do a separate thread for this Anyway vatutin(tanks)>lannes(tanks) Lannes(inf)>vatutin(inf) I'm not going to comment that. We're getting too off topic. |
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Dec 25, 2015 6:16:14 GMT
NEVER EVER SELL GOVOROV (ME)!!!! I did. For Graziani ^How to make two Russian general angry 101 yup, true sign of french-ness, selling Russians for meat sheild Italians who eventually lost the war, go on, keep buying more crap Italian generals (except Badoglio and Riccard) you'll love em   |
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Dec 25, 2015 23:40:52 GMT
Anyway vatutin(tanks)>lannes(tanks) Lannes(inf)>vatutin(inf) I'm not going to comment that. We're getting too off topic. Instead of saying that Lannes is the best at everything, you could always just agree with the statement that is obviously true. |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Dec 26, 2015 4:48:05 GMT
I did. For Graziani ^How to make two Russian general angry 101 yup, true sign of french-ness, selling Russians for meat sheild Italians who eventually lost the war, go on, keep buying more crap Italian generals (except Badoglio and Riccard) you'll love em Normally I'd start throwing words around me in 15 different languages but I won't do it this time. |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Dec 26, 2015 4:49:30 GMT
I'm not going to comment that. We're getting too off topic. Instead of saying that Lannes is the best at everything, you could always just agree with the statement that is obviously true. Instead of saying that Mountbatten is the best at everything, you could always just agree with the statement that is obviously true. Don't point at me eventhough you're doing the same |
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Dec 26, 2015 5:14:59 GMT
I have not said Mountbatten can do anything in weeks.
|
|
