|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Jul 26, 2018 18:21:16 GMT
Does anyone else here like using timoshenko. First off, he has an absordely high rank (General - 230 health), which is a steal considering he costs 2270 medals. Secondly, he is a tank general with lvl 5 movement. That’s right, he moves as fast as Manstein does. The fastest tank general in the game along with Manstein. Third, he has lvl 3 tide of iron, so he has great survivability. Fourth, he had a fairly nice skill set: urban warfare, supply, panzer leader, just at low levels. All in all, for 2270 medals he offers a great bargain and is fantastic support general for Guderian. He is phenomenal on a super tank. How do you guys feel about him personally? He personally saved my *Auto corrected* in the 1960 conquest, where his tide of iron skill allowed him to grab khaborovsk as Guderian had already been nuked.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nobunaga Oda on Jul 27, 2018 14:30:09 GMT
Normally players don't use tank gens as static city defence units so we would consider Urban Fighting an average skill for tank gens.
Some analysed that Panzer Leader may not be that good because the crit dmg is actually the gen's atk power at full potential (which is achievable without the skill) & the fact that Panzer Leader's trigger chance is horribly low.
That depends, if you feel he is good then thst's what Timoshenko is.
Also, for his price, some members would compare him to the best tank gen, Guderian. This would overshadow Timoshenko's potential and make him disadvantaged.
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Jul 30, 2018 2:31:28 GMT
I agree, but timoshenko still has fantastic survivability. I agree that his skills aren’t the best, but he does have lvl 3 tide of iron along with lvl 5 movement, and 4 stars in tanks, and a crap ton of health. This makes him a better supporting general than patton in my opinion, as patton lacks tide of iron. I agree guderian is better, but Timoshenko + Guderian is overpowered. He is really a general that is only spectacular on a super heavy tank though.
And keep in my mind, as for guderian, his skills aren’t also all good. You could argue that its only plain warfare and lvl 3 tide of iron that make him good, out of which timoshenko has the lvl 3 tide of iron. Overall timoshenko is a little more than a thousand medals, but offers a lot in value as a supporting general, so comparing him to Rommel and Patton would be more accurate, as he outruns both of them, has a significant advantage on Patton and Rommel. In fact, he is even more useful than my manstein at certain situations.
|
|
|
|
Post by Iosef Stalin on Aug 28, 2018 21:50:40 GMT
He terrible. You can't even use 5 stars of movement on tanks.
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Sept 29, 2018 12:11:11 GMT
He terrible. You can't even use 5 stars of movement on tanks. What do you mean? |
|
|
|
Post by Max Otto von Stierlitz on Sept 29, 2018 20:17:20 GMT
If you have Guderian and Manstein, you can make EC as 3rd tank gen. I used Vatutin as 3rd tank gen because of his output (together with Guderian and EC), IMO Vatutin in tank is more useful than Manstein, but I think it's better to invest medals in EC than buy 3rd tank gen when you already got Guderian and Manstein.
|
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Sept 30, 2018 1:48:06 GMT
Timoshenko is never bad, but there are better(more expensive) alternatives.
We need 3 tanks, no doubt for Gudedian and Patton. No one excludes Gudedian, and Patton is the best cheap alternative of Manstein.
But for the third one(non-EC), it’s really based on preference. Vatutin has output, Rommel is tanky, Montgomery is good at air, and Timoshenko is cheap. I choose to recommend Vatutin and Rommel simply because they are easier to use.
Remember one thing... even Eisenhower and Zhukov can fit that spot, then why others can’t?
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Sept 30, 2018 2:51:02 GMT
Timoshenko is never bad, but there are better(more expensive) alternatives. We need 3 tanks, no doubt for Gudedian and Patton. No one excludes Gudedian, and Patton is the best cheap alternative of Manstein. But for the third one(non-EC), it’s really based on preference. Vatutin has output, Rommel is tanky, Montgomery is good at air, and Timoshenko is cheap. I choose to recommend Vatutin and Rommel simply because they are easier to use. Remember one thing... even Eisenhower and Zhukov can fit that spot, then why others can’t? Tru. Also Devers is there as a temporary cold war general as well with great movement. You put him on a super tank and he’ll go to work. |
|
|
|
Post by Isoroku Yamamoto on Oct 3, 2018 16:42:03 GMT
Does anyone else here like using timoshenko. First off, he has an absordely high rank (General - 230 health), which is a steal considering he costs 2270 medals. Secondly, he is a tank general with lvl 5 movement. That’s right, he moves as fast as Manstein does. The fastest tank general in the game along with Manstein. Third, he has lvl 3 tide of iron, so he has great survivability. Fourth, he had a fairly nice skill set: urban warfare, supply, panzer leader, just at low levels. All in all, for 2270 medals he offers a great bargain and is fantastic support general for Guderian. He is phenomenal on a super tank. How do you guys feel about him personally? He personally saved my *Auto corrected* in the 1960 conquest, where his tide of iron skill allowed him to grab khaborovsk as Guderian had already been nuked. Timoshenko isn't bad, I use him often |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Oct 3, 2018 17:37:41 GMT
Does anyone else here like using timoshenko. First off, he has an absordely high rank (General - 230 health), which is a steal considering he costs 2270 medals. Secondly, he is a tank general with lvl 5 movement. That’s right, he moves as fast as Manstein does. The fastest tank general in the game along with Manstein. Third, he has lvl 3 tide of iron, so he has great survivability. Fourth, he had a fairly nice skill set: urban warfare, supply, panzer leader, just at low levels. All in all, for 2270 medals he offers a great bargain and is fantastic support general for Guderian. He is phenomenal on a super tank. How do you guys feel about him personally? He personally saved my *Auto corrected* in the 1960 conquest, where his tide of iron skill allowed him to grab khaborovsk as Guderian had already been nuked. Timoshenko isn't bad, I use him often Me too. He is amazing for cold war. |
|
