|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 22, 2018 2:47:06 GMT
I see quite a few people getting Charlemagne in the game, and was wondering what the general opinion on him is, as he isn’t really talked about much.
|
|
|
|
Post by Robert Walpole on Aug 22, 2018 11:11:57 GMT
Saladin is simply much better due to how much medals you can save and the fact he has logistics. It takes a while before actually getting the general though.
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 22, 2018 15:54:42 GMT
Saladin is simply much better due to how much medals you can save and the fact he has logistics. It takes a while before actually getting the general though. I am not really a fan either. I was just watching a Russian youtuber use him, along with Suleiman, and Edward. A bit strange how he didn’t get Nobunaga or Atilla. Also in the general lvl 6 thread, I saw that whoever bought him also upgraded all his skills to level ten. Now there are generals in this game who have good skills but are weak overall, so I was wondering if he was maybe one of those good generals who has bad skills. He seems like a fantastic general for cav com, as he takes 50% less damage from archers, has a defense expert perk, has shelter, and has a crap ton of health and defense. |
|
