|
Post by Mountbatten on Dec 14, 2015 3:28:54 GMT
I'm not even sure where the ROC is at this point. Is it just Taiwan?
|
|
|
Post by Von Bismarck jr on Dec 14, 2015 3:47:07 GMT
I'm not even sure where the ROC is at this point. Is it just Taiwan? In WC3 there was a small ROC area in southern China around Burma or India. Other than that I don't know. We really need a world wide map, then smaller maps for the different regions, Europe, USSR+Asia (we have a couple maps for Asia, it's good enough), Oceania (we have Indonesia) Africa (which we have), and The Americas. Lol what if we began Antarctic warfare lol.
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Dec 14, 2015 4:43:10 GMT
I'm not even sure where the ROC is at this point. Is it just Taiwan? In WC3 there was a small ROC area in southern China around Burma or India. Other than that I don't know. We really need a world wide map, then smaller maps for the different regions, Europe, USSR+Asia (we have a couple maps for Asia, it's good enough), Oceania (we have Indonesia) Africa (which we have), and The Americas. Lol what if we began Antarctic warfare lol. Maybe the Nazis were actually there...
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Dec 14, 2015 4:49:00 GMT
Mountbatten is there. He is persuading the penguin empire to revolt.
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Dec 14, 2015 5:10:13 GMT
Mountbatten is there. He is persuading the penguin empire to revolt. Just don't let history repeat itself (Dieppe Raid)
|
|
|
Post by António Salazar on Dec 14, 2015 6:11:51 GMT
For the ROC : See map For those who researched ''advanced tanks''= Idk how you guys invented that... but it is replaced by advanced armament.
|
|
|
Post by General William T. Sherman on Dec 14, 2015 10:59:08 GMT
Yeah guys, António Salazar worked hard on the tech tree, please follow it. ROUND ENDS IN SIX HOURS
|
|
|
Post by NetherFreek on Dec 14, 2015 14:41:24 GMT
INDIA:
1-2-3-4 advanced arnament 5: build tank army 6: Battle for Padma river
because a river is easy to defend i decide to invade Bangladesh/west pakistan to the Padma river, a 7 is needed (normal number, don't see a reason why to raise or decrease it)
MNYPZt6d
(tell me if this is too much land)·
|
|
|
Post by NetherFreek on Dec 14, 2015 14:42:24 GMT
it failed . 2 armies has been lost. so a total of 5.
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Dec 14, 2015 15:10:17 GMT
INDIA: 1-2-3-4 advanced arnament 5: build tank army 6: Battle for Padma river because a river is easy to defend i decide to invade Bangladesh/west pakistan to the Padma river, a 7 is needed (normal number, don't see a reason why to raise or decrease it) MNYPZt6d (tell me if this is too much land) Well I just checked Google maps and padma river is actually 1/5 of Bangladesh (please call it east Pakistan till 1971) so your turn was actually op but since you lost it so the river thing doesn't matter now
|
|
|
Post by António Salazar on Dec 14, 2015 15:12:17 GMT
USA 1,2) Advanced Armament 3,4) Advanced Guards improving the presence of American forces in West-Germany and Asia 5,6) Ship built in Hawaii, army built in Hawaii. Army with ship convoyed to Taiwan. Other USA stuff: -USA starts negotiations with PRC -USA offers Pakistan an act of friendship -''Economic post-war wealth in the USA'' 500TH POST: MEET MARSHAL TALLEYRAND!
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Dec 14, 2015 15:12:38 GMT
INDIA: 1-2-3-4 advanced arnament 5: build tank army 6: Battle for Padma river because a river is easy to defend i decide to invade Bangladesh/west pakistan to the Padma river, a 7 is needed (normal number, don't see a reason why to raise or decrease it) MNYPZt6d (tell me if this is too much land) Well I just checked Google maps and padma river is actually 1/5 of Bangladesh (please call it east Pakistan till 1971) so your turn was actually op but since you lost it so the river thing doesn't matter now If a country is small then 1/5 isn't THAT op. If we have to fight every country step by step with minimal gain then we would be here forever.
|
|
|
Post by NetherFreek on Dec 14, 2015 15:26:57 GMT
so should it be around that range or bigger/smaller? (the amount of land)
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Dec 14, 2015 15:29:29 GMT
|
|
|
Post by NetherFreek on Dec 14, 2015 15:32:49 GMT
i think the amount of land is good, if you look at it closely, you see that the amount of land isn't differing that much. and if you make the land even smaller, it would take ages
|
|