|
Post by Gone on Oct 9, 2019 1:45:09 GMT
You’re probably going to be mad, but this Aura that Dabrowski has left me wondering for a lot of time.
|
|
|
Post by silvercreek on Oct 9, 2019 2:11:09 GMT
silvercreek, does she perform just well by herself? Or does she feel lacking? Very well! as alone,,she has surprise and plains,but she drops in after Blucher/Murat.
|
|
|
Post by silvercreek on Oct 9, 2019 2:17:19 GMT
You’re probably going to be mad, but this Aura that Dabrowski has left me wondering for a lot of time. And i agree Dabrowski has some good things going for him,and bad. He costs alot,has the Duke syndrome that Lan does not have so better to upgrade lan.
|
|
|
Post by silvercreek on Oct 9, 2019 2:24:51 GMT
The Duke syndrome is not only a matter of range,but also survivability,of course. Lan can get emporess, Dabrowski only duke,now pick who you want spend medals on😁
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Oct 9, 2019 2:26:47 GMT
The Duke syndrome is not only a matter of range,but also survivability,of course. Jeez, you’re right! I forgot that it also means his defense is much lower!
|
|
|
Post by cardbattler on Oct 9, 2019 3:25:22 GMT
The Duke syndrome is not only a matter of range,but also survivability,of course. Lan can get emporess, Dabrowski only duke,now pick who you want spend medals on😁 both
|
|
|
Post by silvercreek on Oct 9, 2019 3:47:29 GMT
The Duke syndrome is not only a matter of range,but also survivability,of course. Lan can get emporess, Dabrowski only duke,now pick who you want spend medals on😁 both Would be up to the player. I don't really care.
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Oct 9, 2019 14:25:52 GMT
i think that people will buy dabrowski regardless of the situation. No iaps? Get lan and dabrowski. 3 cavarly generals. Bought blucher? Get dabrowski as a support!
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Oct 9, 2019 17:22:40 GMT
i think that people will buy dabrowski regardless of the situation. No iaps? Get lan and dabrowski. 3 cavarly generals. Bought blucher? Get dabrowski as a support! I don’t know. Part of me wants to get Dabrowski. Part of me wants to get Lan. Dabrowski has Aura, but I feel like he’s too frail. Duke syndrome means his defense is meh which means he can die quickly if he gets targeted by the AI. Lan lacks Aura, but she can handle herself much better than Dabrowski. Has much better defense and her skills are one level above Dabrowski’s. Lan trades Dabrowski’s Aura for better overall combat capabilities. Now since cavalry is meant to charge and wreak havoc, buying a cavalry general exclusively for support seems like not the best of choices. That’s why I think that Lan is probably the better choice. Consider also that she costs nearly as half as Dabrowski, yet requires less time to be maxed. All you need to do is get a S-rank in 1812. Although it’s among the harder eras, there are guides for the 1-star countries, with Naples even being considered a very easy one for the era’s standards.
|
|
|
Post by SolidLight on Oct 9, 2019 17:37:56 GMT
i think that people will buy dabrowski regardless of the situation. No iaps? Get lan and dabrowski. 3 cavarly generals. Bought blucher? Get dabrowski as a support! I don’t know. Part of me wants to get Dabrowski. Part of me wants to get Lan. Dabrowski has Aura, but I feel like he’s too frail. Duke syndrome means his defense is meh which means he can die quickly if he gets targeted by the AI. Lan lacks Aura, but she can handle herself much better than Dabrowski. Has much better defense and her skills are one level above Dabrowski’s. Lan trades Dabrowski’s Aura for better overall combat capabilities. Now since cavalry is meant to charge and wreak havoc, buying a cavalry general exclusively for support seems like not the best of choices. That’s why I think that Lan is probably the better choice. Consider also that she costs nearly as half as Dabrowski, yet requires less time to be maxed. All you need to do is get a S-rank in 1812. Although it’s among the harder eras, there are guides for the 1-star countries, with Naples even being considered a very easy one for the era’s standards. Cavalry is so tough that I don’t really care about Dabrowskis lousy defense. Just don’t use him on Light Cav and he’s fine. Also, his damage is still better than Lan even if he has 1 lower skill level, as I showed you earlier. I’d get both tbh. The more the merrier when it comes to cavalry.
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Oct 9, 2019 18:00:09 GMT
I don’t know. Part of me wants to get Dabrowski. Part of me wants to get Lan. Dabrowski has Aura, but I feel like he’s too frail. Duke syndrome means his defense is meh which means he can die quickly if he gets targeted by the AI. Lan lacks Aura, but she can handle herself much better than Dabrowski. Has much better defense and her skills are one level above Dabrowski’s. Lan trades Dabrowski’s Aura for better overall combat capabilities. Now since cavalry is meant to charge and wreak havoc, buying a cavalry general exclusively for support seems like not the best of choices. That’s why I think that Lan is probably the better choice. Consider also that she costs nearly as half as Dabrowski, yet requires less time to be maxed. All you need to do is get a S-rank in 1812. Although it’s among the harder eras, there are guides for the 1-star countries, with Naples even being considered a very easy one for the era’s standards. Cavalry is so tough that I don’t really care about Dabrowskis lousy defense. Just don’t use him on Light Cav and he’s fine. Also, his damage is still better than Lan even if he has 1 lower skill level, as I showed you earlier. I’d get both tbh. The more the merrier when it comes to cavalry. Well, if the defense doesn’t matter that much, then I’m going for him after I finish maxing Massena, get and max Karl, get and max Napoleon and get and max Mahmud II. I would only do 1812 after my tech and those 6 generals would be maxed anyways.
|
|
|
Post by silvercreek on Oct 9, 2019 18:57:04 GMT
Then we all should agree to getting both. In the end,it will Lan stays on your roster 😀
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Oct 9, 2019 19:19:39 GMT
Then we all should agree to getting both. In the end,it will Lan stays on your roster 😀 You’re right. Since I have Blucher and soon Napoleon, it will be like this (not counting both of them): Murat-Massena-Karl-Mahmud II- Dabrowski-John-Lan-Barclay—Sakurako What a team!
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Oct 9, 2019 19:51:56 GMT
Sadly, we’ve already seen that Nelson is unneeded, so we can make room for Barclay and Alexander I if we have Blücher and Napoleon.
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Oct 11, 2019 14:42:05 GMT
Press F for our fallen princesses replaced by the new IAP generals
|
|