|
|
Post by Iron Duke on Aug 28, 2018 16:16:11 GMT
What's the difference? Is there one? It's not massively important, just a curiosity, but the "+" makes it look like Ambush does more harm than good!    |
|
|
|
Post by dain on Aug 28, 2018 16:37:24 GMT
Ambush gives you +50% attack bonus to archers - you can see this in "Cantar de Mio Cid" (Charlemagne fifth campaign).
El Cid just deals great damage to archers.
Shield is the opposite: 50% less damage from archers - Saladin on level 6 is an example.
|
|
|
|
Post by Iron Duke on Aug 28, 2018 16:59:38 GMT
Ambush gives you +50% attack bonus to archers - you can see this in "Cantar de Mio Cid" (Charlemagne fifth campaign). El Cid just deals great damage to archers. Shield is the opposite: 50% less damage from archers - Saladin on level 6 is an example. Just poor wording for the ambush skill then. |
|
|
|
Post by dain on Aug 28, 2018 17:14:53 GMT
Ambush gives you +50% attack bonus to archers - you can see this in "Cantar de Mio Cid" (Charlemagne fifth campaign). El Cid just deals great damage to archers. Shield is the opposite: 50% less damage from archers - Saladin on level 6 is an example. Just poor wording for the ambush skill then. Probably. |
|
|
|
Post by Iosef Stalin on Aug 28, 2018 19:23:39 GMT
I would agree. It kind of does look like that......at least it doesn't actually happen.
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 28, 2018 19:45:00 GMT
El cid sadly lacks braveness and he is the only general with that skill. A waste if you ask me
|
|
|
|
Post by Iosef Stalin on Aug 28, 2018 20:25:14 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 28, 2018 20:30:37 GMT
There are some amazing cheap cavarly generals though. Like Batu Khan and Hannibal have plunder, and Batu has leadership while Hannibal has Braveness. El cid is just meh. I mean what good is having 50% extra archer damage if attacking one halfs your health bar. |
|
|
|
Post by Iosef Stalin on Aug 28, 2018 20:31:50 GMT
I know. Hannibal is impossible to not get and batu khan is great.
|
|
