|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 29, 2018 20:06:55 GMT
Guys, how do You know Sophia is better? Are You using her? Or have You calculated her final stats? Could You please share it? Good point. I will personally buy victoria very soon and will see if they are as good as we imagine them to be. |
|
|
|
Post by Charlemagne on Aug 29, 2018 22:51:09 GMT
Imo sophia is better than Mahmud. Output wise, definitely. But Mahmud is a better team player Will medal work for skill you dont have? |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 29, 2018 23:55:50 GMT
Output wise, definitely. But Mahmud is a better team player Will medal work for skill you dont have? Well for the most part no. The crit medals, and the fire prevention medal are independent of any skills however. |
|
|
|
Post by Admiral Aleksandr Kolchak on Aug 30, 2018 4:35:12 GMT
Is Lan any good? I hear she can replace Dabrowski
|
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Aug 30, 2018 4:47:15 GMT
Is Lan any good? I hear she can replace Dabrowski Lan is Murat without aura. Dambrovsky is aura gen. You can't directly compare them. If You need second aura gen You need Dambrovsky, if Your playstyle is not based on using several auras at once Lan will be better for You. So as usual there is no ideal recipe for every player. "One man's treasure is another man's trash" In Russian language this proverb sounds like: what is good for Russian is German's certain death. |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Aug 30, 2018 6:54:39 GMT
Is Lan any good? I hear she can replace Dabrowski Lan is Murat without aura. Dambrovsky is aura gen. You can't directly compare them. If You need second aura gen You need Dambrovsky, if Your playstyle is not based on using several auras at once Lan will be better for You. So as usual there is no ideal recipe for every player. "One man's treasure is another man's trash" In Russian language this proverb sounds like: what is good for Russian is German's certain death. Good point... And very illustrative... Especially taking into account that Admiral Aleksandr Kolchak (as I understand) is from Germany  |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Aug 30, 2018 7:12:11 GMT
Though personally I wouldn't replace aura generals with other without aura in any case. For two simple reasons:
1. It is a great team skill.
2. It is a great personal skill as well.
And many forget that aura is an excellent personal skill. Dabrowski has the best possible combination of skills in EW6: aura + Plain fighting + flat damage. Only a couple generals have it. Even lvl 4 of those skills is better than lvl 5 of many other decent skills, imo...
|
|
|
|
Post by Admiral Aleksandr Kolchak on Aug 30, 2018 7:20:22 GMT
Is Lan any good? I hear she can replace Dabrowski Lan is Murat without aura. Dambrovsky is aura gen. You can't directly compare them. If You need second aura gen You need Dambrovsky, if Your playstyle is not based on using several auras at once Lan will be better for You. So as usual there is no ideal recipe for every player. "One man's treasure is another man's trash" In Russian language this proverb sounds like: what is good for Russian is German's certain death. I more over like to overpower my Cavalry and send them alone to deal crazy damage |
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Aug 30, 2018 7:47:35 GMT
Lan is Murat without aura. Dambrovsky is aura gen. You can't directly compare them. If You need second aura gen You need Dambrovsky, if Your playstyle is not based on using several auras at once Lan will be better for You. So as usual there is no ideal recipe for every player. "One man's treasure is another man's trash" In Russian language this proverb sounds like: what is good for Russian is German's certain death. I more over like to overpower my Cavalry and send them alone to deal crazy damage If You are not going to use aura with Cav, Lan is imo a bit more profitable. 1. A bit higher stats (Emperor vs. Duke) 2. Higher terrain bonus (Duke is only lv4) 3. Edge is quite good skill. Profit can be compared with aura profit for Dambrovsky himself. Especially taking into account that Lan's skills cap is lv5 compared to lv4 for Dambrovsky. But, I would recommend You to use aura gens, as it increases You power a lot. You can benefit from it not only with Your gens, but with units You can send to support either advance or defence. That gives You high flexibility with allocating Your forces on the battlefield. |
|
|
|
Post by Robert Walpole on Aug 30, 2018 10:42:07 GMT
I more over like to overpower my Cavalry and send them alone to deal crazy damage If You are not going to use aura with Cav, Lan is imo a bit more profitable. 1. A bit higher stats (Emperor vs. Duke) 2. Higher terrain bonus (Duke is only lv4) 3. Edge is quite good skill. Profit can be compared with aura profit for Dambrovsky himself. Especially taking into account that Lan's skills cap is lv5 compared to lv4 for Dambrovsky. But, I would recommend You to use aura gens, as it increases You power a lot. You can benefit from it not only with Your gens, but with units You can send to support either advance or defence. That gives You high flexibility with allocating Your forces on the battlefield. And with stronger regular units means that when they die, you can simply replace them thus having 50 material militias doing 100 damage |
|
