|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 10, 2019 17:57:10 GMT
That one general you misplaced in the first turn and thought wouldn't be an issue, which leads to being the reason you didn't 3 star the campaign
|
|
|
|
Post by Nobunaga Oda on Aug 11, 2019 9:59:10 GMT
This one is more of frustrating others rather than me:
I use Pacorus I on the 2nd best inf unit in any campaign unless a 2nd starting cav unit is provided.
Why? Because my Commander is cav oriented with all cav atk points and 2 cav skills.
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 17, 2019 0:51:28 GMT
 these are the worst. Its like the game punishes you for being too good and be-lining to the finish line. |
|
|
|
Post by silvercreek on Aug 17, 2019 4:28:05 GMT
these are the worst. Its like the game punishes you for being too good and be-lining to the finish line. Could be,but I don't think the game punishes you,for being too good,its just hard period.😅 |
|
|
|
Post by silvercreek on Aug 17, 2019 4:44:00 GMT
these are the worst. Its like the game punishes you for being too good and be-lining to the finish line. Could be,but I don't think the game punishes you,for being too good,its just hard period.😅 For those who wish to play this game,be forwarend,it is not free to plaly,expect pay alot cash. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 17, 2019 10:47:15 GMT
This game is too expensive. stoic paid one dollar so he can play and complete the game. A guy known to never pay anything on any of the ET games paid 1 dollar to play the game. Put that into perspective. |
|
|
|
Post by Nobunaga Oda on Aug 17, 2019 11:25:15 GMT
these are the worst. Its like the game punishes you for being too good and be-lining to the finish line. Could be,but I don't think the game punishes you,for being too good,its just hard period.😅 Played British Wars Briton campaign 2 (Raid camp) and lost not because I didn't clear the objective in time. It's because I killed all the enemy troops available and this didn't add up to 36 units. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 17, 2019 13:27:31 GMT
Could be,but I don't think the game punishes you,for being too good,its just hard period.😅 Played British Wars Briton campaign 2 (Raid camp) and lost not because I didn't clear the objective in time. It's because I killed all the enemy troops available and this didn't add up to 36 units. Yeha thats the situation that frustrates me the most. When you killed everybody but you still have 1 more troop needed. The best way to match this is to replay the mission, focus on killing the enemy units primarily and have your allies take the cities. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 17, 2019 13:29:54 GMT
Could be,but I don't think the game punishes you,for being too good,its just hard period.😅 For those who wish to play this game,be forwarend,it is not free to plaly,expect pay alot cash. Honestly, I think people underestimate the power of cheap generals. They have the same hp as the strong generals, just minus the advancement in the skill set. There are many good ones. So if you dig wide rather than deep, then sell them to make room for the better ones like pompey, you will both not lose many medals and will get very far into the game. Some of them even have the same or yet better talents than then the expensive ones. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 17, 2019 13:44:00 GMT
For those who wish to play this game,be forwarend,it is not free to plaly,expect pay alot cash. Honestly, I think people underestimate the power of cheap generals. They have the same hp as the strong generals, just minus the advancement in the skill set. There are many good ones. So if you dig wide rather than deep, then sell them to make room for the better ones like pompey, you will both not lose many medals and will get very far into the game. Some of them even have the same or yet better talents than then the expensive ones. Agreed. Only general I could think of that have a skillset that truly outshines others are Hannibal, Antony and Pompey. All others are slightly better or slightly worse skillwise+talent wise. Since hp and defense is not affected by the general, rather only the attack,this means a bronze general can pawn a gold Gen in combat, as long as you can use their advantages well. Of course, bronze gens have around 16 damage disadvantage when compared to gold gens, but 16 damage isn't that of a big deal if the skillset and talent compensates for it. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 17, 2019 13:51:02 GMT
Honestly, I think people underestimate the power of cheap generals. They have the same hp as the strong generals, just minus the advancement in the skill set. There are many good ones. So if you dig wide rather than deep, then sell them to make room for the better ones like pompey, you will both not lose many medals and will get very far into the game. Some of them even have the same or yet better talents than then the expensive ones. Agreed. Only general I could think of that have a skillset that truly outshines others are Hannibal, Antony and Pompey. All others are slightly better or slightly worse skillwise+talent wise. Since hp and defense is not affected by the general, rather only the attack,this means a bronze general can pawn a gold Gen in combat, as long as you can use their advantages well. Of course, bronze gens have around 16 damage disadvantage when compared to gold gens, but 16 damage isn't that of a big deal if the skillset and talent compensates for it. Its not the skills themselves but the level that is lacking. Like lvl 1 cavarly commander, lvl 1 jungle fighting... |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 17, 2019 14:15:12 GMT
Agreed. Only general I could think of that have a skillset that truly outshines others are Hannibal, Antony and Pompey. All others are slightly better or slightly worse skillwise+talent wise. Since hp and defense is not affected by the general, rather only the attack,this means a bronze general can pawn a gold Gen in combat, as long as you can use their advantages well. Of course, bronze gens have around 16 damage disadvantage when compared to gold gens, but 16 damage isn't that of a big deal if the skillset and talent compensates for it. Its not the skills themselves but the level that is lacking. Like lvl 1 cavarly commander, lvl 1 jungle fighting... Yeah, they need more investment. Same with ranking. Just need to find a great one, and maybe invest, or just sell them for better ones later on. |
|
|
|
Post by liamcog on Aug 24, 2019 22:19:31 GMT
I hate how when you rely on your cavalry attacking again to capture a city the chance of this goes from 60% to 20%
|
|
|
|
Post by silvercreek on Oct 3, 2019 6:59:01 GMT
I hate how when you rely on your cavalry attacking again to capture a city the chance of this goes from 60% to 20% Cavalry is significantly weak in GCR. You get 1-2 attacks,then they are done. Not only that,you need to capture and hold the primary city and military camp. Little nuances like this are lost on people. |
|
|
|
Post by teemee123 on Dec 3, 2019 10:50:50 GMT
Most annoying thing is scrolling through all the replies to this thread to see if anyone's mentioned yet when your cavalry could have taken a city if it got to move again, and then realising on the last two posts that someone already has.
|
|
