|
|
Post by andrei on Mar 20, 2021 8:08:24 GMT
Even with one gen it is still solid chance at the cost of one skill, which anyway could be situational. Not an ultimate skill of course but could be a good help against strong enemies You'ld like to avoid fighting. And I don't find 30 solid enough. Compared to a worse stun I rather pour all my firepower onto it and take the city ASAP. Since it's called a game changing skill then I should expect it to be a part of my regular tactics, but 30 isn't good enough for that. I don't think is a game changer for single player. In case player vs player it is important. Player with Dogfight on all his gens will crush the player without it I am pretty sure. |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Mar 20, 2021 8:17:18 GMT
And I don't find 30 solid enough. Compared to a worse stun I rather pour all my firepower onto it and take the city ASAP. Since it's called a game changing skill then I should expect it to be a part of my regular tactics, but 30 isn't good enough for that. I don't think is a game changer for single player. In case player vs player it is important. Player with Dogfight on all his gens will crush the player without it I am pretty sure. Oh PVP of course. I've heard from PVP hosts in baidu that Dogfight ban is very common in PVP. I thought the discussion is about PVE. |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Mar 20, 2021 8:29:51 GMT
Even with one gen it is still solid chance at the cost of one skill, which anyway could be situational. Not an ultimate skill of course but could be a good help against strong enemies You'ld like to avoid fighting. And I don't find 30 solid enough. Compared to a worse stun I rather pour all my firepower onto it and take the city ASAP. Since it's called a game changing skill then I should expect it to be a part of my regular tactics, but 30 isn't good enough for that. It depends on our understanding what is "game changing". If we understand it as "super powerful" - then perhaps not, Dog fight is not game changing. But my meaning of "game changing" is "to have an interesting tactical opportunity we otherwise don't have". It is the skill that can change the balance of power right at the beginning of a mission or conquest. If we are able to stun a Turkish general inside his city playing as Russian Empire, it is almost a guarantee that Asia Minor will fall soon enough. |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Mar 20, 2021 8:37:23 GMT
And I don't find 30 solid enough. Compared to a worse stun I rather pour all my firepower onto it and take the city ASAP. Since it's called a game changing skill then I should expect it to be a part of my regular tactics, but 30 isn't good enough for that. It depends on our understanding what is "game changing". If we understand it as "super powerful" - then perhaps not, Dog fight is not game changing. But my meaning of "game changing" is "to have an interesting tactical opportunity we otherwise don't have". It is the skill that can change the balance of power right at the beginning of a mission or conquest. If we are able to stun a Turkish general inside his city playing as Russian Empire, it is almost a guarantee that Asia Minor will fall soon enough. Yeah but I don't really like it unless there's a considerable chance to trigger it. For that I'll need at least 3 of them. But if I have 3 power generals then that Turkish general is probably dead. I think this is where our view on the game split. |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Mar 20, 2021 8:41:13 GMT
It depends on our understanding what is "game changing". If we understand it as "super powerful" - then perhaps not, Dog fight is not game changing. But my meaning of "game changing" is "to have an interesting tactical opportunity we otherwise don't have". It is the skill that can change the balance of power right at the beginning of a mission or conquest. If we are able to stun a Turkish general inside his city playing as Russian Empire, it is almost a guarantee that Asia Minor will fall soon enough. Yeah but I don't really like it unless there's a considerable chance to trigger it. For that I'll need at least 3 of them. But if I have 3 power generals then that Turkish general is probably dead. I think this is where our view on the game split. It is not always possible to concentrate such firepower. And usually we don't have enough time. Btw, at the beginning of a mission or a conquest it is a 100 percent probability   |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Mar 20, 2021 8:50:32 GMT
Yeah but I don't really like it unless there's a considerable chance to trigger it. For that I'll need at least 3 of them. But if I have 3 power generals then that Turkish general is probably dead. I think this is where our view on the game split. It is not always possible to concentrate such firepower. And usually we don't have enough time. Btw, at the beginning of a mission or a conquest it is a 100 percent probability Looks interesting. But I won't do it on Ivanov since his skill set is too good. Maybe Leopold when I have spare medals and textbooks. |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Mar 20, 2021 13:40:17 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Mar 24, 2021 14:03:01 GMT
|
|
Georgy Zhukov
First Lieutenant
Hitler suicided before my troops had the chance to kill him.
Posts: 24
|
Post by Georgy Zhukov on Apr 16, 2021 6:55:14 GMT
In the later campaigns, at Maxed skills. This guy output is higher than Foch when both are maxed out despite Foch equipping with a artillery quadrant He was my first general bought for medals and now, when I have both him and Hotzendorf I rate him higher as well... Is Radko worth it because I bought him and he does pretty good damage, but I don't know if I should have bought a better general. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 16, 2021 9:20:04 GMT
He was my first general bought for medals and now, when I have both him and Hotzendorf I rate him higher as well... Is Radko worth it because I bought him and he does pretty good damage, but I don't know if I should have bought a better general. Radko is good but not endgame general imo, Hotzendorf is better. |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Apr 16, 2021 9:28:00 GMT
He was my first general bought for medals and now, when I have both him and Hotzendorf I rate him higher as well... Is Radko worth it because I bought him and he does pretty good damage, but I don't know if I should have bought a better general. That's the trick. Since we can change skills many dicent generals become obsolete. Dmitriev has 5 skills and this is good. Bad news is that all of his skills are only lvl 4 when fully upgraded. It is a significant disadvantage when compared to other generals with lvl 5 skills (Ivanov, Beseler, Hindenburg and Leopold). But since you bought him already there is no need to be disappointed. You can use him quite for a long time until you have enough resources to replace him. |
|
Georgy Zhukov
First Lieutenant
Hitler suicided before my troops had the chance to kill him.
Posts: 24
|
Post by Georgy Zhukov on Apr 25, 2021 8:03:27 GMT
Fortunately I have also Ivanov and followed your advice about removing inspiration and putting jungle fighting. I also got a medal which boosted his jungle fighting.
|
|
Georgy Zhukov
First Lieutenant
Hitler suicided before my troops had the chance to kill him.
Posts: 24
|
Post by Georgy Zhukov on Apr 25, 2021 8:06:57 GMT
|
|
Georgy Zhukov
First Lieutenant
Hitler suicided before my troops had the chance to kill him.
Posts: 24
|
Post by Georgy Zhukov on Apr 25, 2021 17:52:39 GMT
Sorry, I got the advice somewhere else
|
|
Georgy Zhukov
First Lieutenant
Hitler suicided before my troops had the chance to kill him.
Posts: 24
|
Post by Georgy Zhukov on Apr 25, 2021 17:52:58 GMT
I was mistaken
|
|
