|
|
Post by skr on May 14, 2020 10:49:50 GMT
no i didnt spend any real money on the game so i dont hv petain. im on the french campaign now, straubenberg is really good, but i still have about 2000 medals now, Im gonna buy beseler. i have hipper for my navy but do i need to buy more navy gen?
|
|
|
|
Post by speechless188 on May 14, 2020 11:14:52 GMT
no i didnt spend any real money on the game so i dont hv petain. im on the french campaign now, straubenberg is really good, but i still have about 2000 medals now, Im gonna buy beseler. i have hipper for my navy but do i need to buy more navy gen? if u wanna. Honestly a second navy is seldom useful, but u can just for fun like lots of other people |
|
|
|
Post by ambitiousace on May 14, 2020 14:25:55 GMT
Artillery at this point is much more crucial than navy so get bestseler
|
|
|
|
Post by Navia Lanoira on May 14, 2020 15:25:59 GMT
no i didnt spend any real money on the game so i dont hv petain. im on the french campaign now, straubenberg is really good, but i still have about 2000 medals now, Im gonna buy beseler. i have hipper for my navy but do i need to buy more navy gen? Buy navy gen later. For now, buy a cav gen as it also helps you in the campaign. |
|
rokee
First Lieutenant
Likes playing strategy games.Still sucks at them.
Posts: 44
|
Post by rokee on Jun 8, 2020 6:34:23 GMT
Is Straubenberg a good gen to have?
|
|
|
|
Post by Harry Lillis "Bing" Crosby Jr on Jun 8, 2020 8:36:24 GMT
Is Straubenberg a good gen to have? Yep, he's very capable of performing well on plains, plus infantry commander is a good skill on him. Pairing him up with Boroevic, with jungle and mountain fighting, is a good combination |
|
|
|
Post by valdemar on Jun 9, 2020 1:29:15 GMT
Is Straubenberg a good gen to have? I found the only inf needed is McMahon in gold/purple due to history. Add low tier inf useful in history modes, McArthur, Falkenhausen, Esperey, Ruzsky, Carol, Bojovic. All can be serviceable and should be given a bit of experience. |
|
rokee
First Lieutenant
Likes playing strategy games.Still sucks at them.
Posts: 44
|
Post by rokee on Jun 9, 2020 10:13:10 GMT
To me McMahon doesn’t look that good.
|
|
rokee
First Lieutenant
Likes playing strategy games.Still sucks at them.
Posts: 44
|
Post by rokee on Jun 9, 2020 10:14:23 GMT
He could be a defensive gen.
|
|
|
|
Post by Navia Lanoira on Jun 9, 2020 15:15:32 GMT
To me McMahon doesn’t look that good. If you are using petain, yes. But if you are not, he is really reliable in history mode. |
|
rokee
First Lieutenant
Likes playing strategy games.Still sucks at them.
Posts: 44
|
Post by rokee on Jun 9, 2020 15:18:20 GMT
Oh,I was just looking at stats and skills.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nobunaga Oda on Jun 22, 2020 5:04:58 GMT
Oh,I was just looking at stats and skills. When you have excess medals and need more firepower for the French history missions, Macmahon's the one, especially if you don't have Petain. According to the views and experiences of other members, that is. Overall, Straußenburg makes for a good inf commander and quite an appealing choice. It's a pity that there's more or less no chance to use him in history mode. |
|
|
|
Post by Józef Poniatowski on Jul 17, 2020 16:14:41 GMT
Oh,I was just looking at stats and skills. When you have excess medals and need more firepower for the French history missions, Macmahon's the one, especially if you don't have Petain. According to the views and experiences of other members, that is. Overall, Straußenburg makes for a good inf commander and quite an appealing choice. It's a pity that there's more or less no chance to use him in history mode. There are so many interesting events with the Austian Empire during this period too  |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Jul 22, 2020 9:08:45 GMT
To me McMahon doesn’t look that good. He has a 5/5 potential skill set with 2 textbook changes (cover and counter for two other skills) making him a uniquely strong general, only other gauranteed example is Macmahon. And that’s without mentioning his history mode importance. Give him pierce and tactics master (for counter and cover), and you’ll see that he’ll be pretty good. |
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Beast on Jul 22, 2020 12:48:18 GMT
To me McMahon doesn’t look that good. He has a 5/5 potential skill set with 2 textbook changes (cover and counter for two other skills) making him a uniquely strong general, only other gauranteed example is Macmahon. And that’s without mentioning his history mode importance. Give him pierce and tactics master (for counter and cover), and you’ll see that he’ll be pretty good. I gave him tactic master and infantry master. Is that okay? |
|
