|
Post by Darth Vader on Jun 21, 2020 14:41:18 GMT
This is a theard where we will talk about anything about the Napoleonic wars from King LouisXVI to Napoleons Exile to Elda.
|
|
|
Post by Nobunaga Oda on Jun 22, 2020 4:14:13 GMT
According to the editors on Wikipedia and possibly some historians whose work were used as reference points in Wiki articles, the wars refer to the War of the 3rd Coalition onwards. This is because Napoleon had first led France as emperor from this war onwards. On this basis, the HRE would only be valid for the 3rd Coalition as it disbanded soon after into the French client states under the Confederation of the Rhine, Prussia and Austria.
Anyways, most sides had technically valid reasons for fighting. The balance of power theory, the Anglo-French rivalry and so on.
|
|
|
Post by Darth Vader on Jun 22, 2020 4:22:24 GMT
According to the editors on Wikipedia and possibly some historians whose work were used as reference points in Wiki articles, the wars refer to the War of the 3rd Coalition onwards. This is because Napoleon had first led France as emperor from this war onwards. On this basis, the HRE would only be valid for the 3rd Coalition as it disbanded soon after into the French client states under the Confederation of the Rhine, Prussia and Austria. Anyways, most sides had technically valid reasons for fighting. The balance of power theory, the Anglo-French rivalry and so on. My friend, Wikipedia is not a excellent source of information. Napoleon was a general from 1792 to 1804 so I see why it's not called the Napoleonic wars. If you know EPIC history TV it talks about all of Napoleon's wars, blunders, victorys and etc. I recommend watching it.
|
|
|
Post by Nobunaga Oda on Jun 22, 2020 4:30:01 GMT
I'd say that I would throw my weight behind the Kingdom of France.
It's cause is the one I'm most sympathetic to. It was facing a major domestic crisis as well as simultaneous invasions by foreign powers into its homeland in attempts to intervene in French politics.
I guess the Ottoman Empire may come in as 2nd place seeing as how it was manipulated by Great Power politics in a sense.
|
|
|
Post by Darth Vader on Jun 22, 2020 4:51:23 GMT
I'd say that I would throw my weight behind the Kingdom of France. It's cause is the one I'm most sympathetic to. It was facing a major domestic crisis as well as simultaneous invasions by foreign powers into its homeland in attempts to intervene in French politics. I guess the Ottoman Empire may come in as 2nd place seeing as how it was manipulated by Great Power politics in a sense. I also supported the Monarchy. The King LouisXVI is quite bad but i don't want to get rid of Kings. Also the revolution just ends up with something worse then a king, a Emperor. (Offtopic) (your in my mod!)
|
|
|
Post by ππ³π°π΅π΄π¬πΊ on Jul 12, 2020 13:39:06 GMT
According to the editors on Wikipedia and possibly some historians whose work were used as reference points in Wiki articles, the wars refer to the War of the 3rd Coalition onwards. This is because Napoleon had first led France as emperor from this war onwards. On this basis, the HRE would only be valid for the 3rd Coalition as it disbanded soon after into the French client states under the Confederation of the Rhine, Prussia and Austria. Anyways, most sides had technically valid reasons for fighting. The balance of power theory, the Anglo-French rivalry and so on. My friend, Wikipedia is not a excellent source of information. Napoleon was a general from 1792 to 1804 so I see why it's not called the Napoleonic wars. If you know EPIC history TV it talks about all of Napoleon's wars, blunders, victorys and etc. I recommend watching it. My friend, if you find errors or have complaints with your Wikipedia - correct it. It's easy and this is how Wikipedia works. Wikipedia and archive are the only two remains of the groundbreaking democratic European Invention: The world-wide-web. The rest became horribly overcommercialized (Thank you US-companies π ) with all the results. Check the different languages! The Spanish Wikipedia became lately very good and detailed. For history themes the English Wikipedia is often unscientific, I see your point, but if any videoproduction can have this quality standards? - I haven't seen one ever!
|
|
|
Post by Darth Nihilus on Jul 12, 2020 15:39:09 GMT
My friend, Wikipedia is not a excellent source of information. Napoleon was a general from 1792 to 1804 so I see why it's not called the Napoleonic wars. If you know EPIC history TV it talks about all of Napoleon's wars, blunders, victorys and etc. I recommend watching it. My friend, if you find errors or have complaints with your Wikipedia - correct it. It's easy and this is how Wikipedia works. Wikipedia and archive are the only two remains of the groundbreaking democratic European Invention: The world-wide-web. The rest became horribly overcommercialized (Thank you US-companies π ) with all the results. Check the different languages! The Spanish Wikipedia became lately very good and detailed. For history themes the English Wikipedia is often unscientific, I see your point, but if any videoproduction can have this quality standards? - I haven't seen one ever! The way I use Wikipedia is to ignore the information and go straight to the references and steal the websites there.
|
|
|
Post by Darth Vader on Jul 12, 2020 19:49:41 GMT
My friend, if you find errors or have complaints with your Wikipedia - correct it. It's easy and this is how Wikipedia works. Wikipedia and archive are the only two remains of the groundbreaking democratic European Invention: The world-wide-web. The rest became horribly overcommercialized (Thank you US-companies π ) with all the results. Check the different languages! The Spanish Wikipedia became lately very good and detailed. For history themes the English Wikipedia is often unscientific, I see your point, but if any videoproduction can have this quality standards? - I haven't seen one ever! The way I use Wikipedia is to ignore the information and go straight to the references and steal the websites there. The sources page is a advantage and disadvantage at the same time. Anyway this is the Napoleonic wars so which nation would you fight for?
|
|
|
Post by Darth Nihilus on Jul 13, 2020 0:35:16 GMT
Probably the Russian empire. I win because it's cold, and we don't have to worry about anything until world war one.
|
|
|
Post by Darth Vader on Jul 13, 2020 0:37:38 GMT
Probably the Russian empire. I win because it's cold, and we don't have to worry about anything until world war one. For some reason you let people with sharp helmets into Russia. Notable examples are the Vikings, Mongols and Ww1 Germany.
|
|
|
Post by Nobunaga Oda on Jul 13, 2020 11:22:12 GMT
Probably the Russian empire. I win because it's cold, and we don't have to worry about anything until world war one. For some reason you let people with sharp helmets into Russia. Notable examples are the Vikings, Mongols and Ww1 Germany. What about Napoleon's expedition?
|
|
|
Post by Darth Nihilus on Jul 13, 2020 14:25:43 GMT
For some reason you let people with sharp helmets into Russia. Notable examples are the Vikings, Mongols and Ww1 Germany. What about Napoleon's expedition? The French put their sharp helmets onto their guns and turned them into bayonets
|
|
|
Post by Darth Vader on Jul 13, 2020 15:42:30 GMT
Sorry Nobunaga Oda, I got carrier away by August question. Anyway, it's weird how some of Napoleon's Marshels who became Kinga betrayed him. Like Bernadotte or at the beginning Murrat. All of them switched sides just to hold their Thorne.
|
|
|
Post by ππ³π°π΅π΄π¬πΊ on Jul 15, 2020 15:29:03 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Clausewitz on Oct 24, 2020 10:56:23 GMT
Prussia (God with us)
|
|