|
Post by ray on Nov 21, 2020 19:27:44 GMT
Please 2 special force you think is best. All of the stats displayed are max. Also, these tanks are super expensive to max out. It takes 525 assault badges to get to level VI Feel free to discuss!
|
|
|
Post by Alexyx on Nov 21, 2020 22:44:33 GMT
Maus is the boss and KV-6 is the Katyusha, but on catepillars
|
|
|
Post by omeganl on Nov 22, 2020 14:25:31 GMT
T-26 sucks
|
|
|
Post by eeeeef on Dec 22, 2020 7:26:52 GMT
Sad T28 didn't stand a chance
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Jan 5, 2021 16:45:55 GMT
I prefer the T-28 to the KV-6. *collective gasp, while my mother cries in the corner that her son has become a disgrace to the family name* The KV-6 may do a butt-ton of damage to other units, and there is nothing more satisfying than hitting someone in the fog with a hit, but . . .
1. When I hit a unit, I tend to want to do most damage to that unit, which the T-28 does better with its increased stats. 2. It is far more survivable than the KV-6, with its perk of avoiding damage 25% of the time, its increased defense, and its higher health, even being able to use its trash perk of anti-air when there is a gen on it. 3. It has a smidge more movement.
Biggest con: No vision. It is a whopper. However, this is easily solved by having other special forces beside it, ones with vision, or even just having an armored car with it.
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Jan 5, 2021 16:48:17 GMT
However the KV-6 does do more damage overall when including splash damage, and has an effective range of 2.5 give or take 0.2. I still prefer the T-28, but the Maus triumphs over all. Edit: The only trouble with the Maus is that it is so slow! *insert all my childhood dreams that were taken away because a unit had one less movement than was necessary* Edit to Edit: Also its perk of when not moved is practically the bane of my existence, as I always move my heavy tanks to that they are within range of as many important units as possible. In addition, my heavy tanks never get below low morale because they destroy infantry and/or those who are flanking me to get higher morale.
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Jan 5, 2021 16:57:04 GMT
I honestly prefer the T-28's perks to the Maus's, *more gasps* but the Maus is still a good ways better than the T-28
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Jan 5, 2021 17:11:02 GMT
A++ Maus- Wicked power and ridiculous defense- 6(!). If I remember correctly, the standard defense of a heavy tank is 5, which means that it takes 70.6% damage. I call that good! Only problem is speed and lame perks.
A+ T-28- Great stats, is fast, has mostly usable perks that are somewhat better than the Maus's, but has no vision, which puts it below the Maus.
A KV-6- Worst stats, but the best perk of the game.
Reminds you of the Choice in WC4 Between A Sgt with no stars but Has Lv 5 Rumor, A Marshal with no stars and Lv 3 Rumor, and A Sgt with 6 stars in everything and no skills.
|
|
|
Post by eeeeef on Jan 5, 2021 17:15:34 GMT
A++ Maus- Wicked power and ridiculous defense- 6(!). If I remember correctly, the standard defense of a heavy tank is 5, which means that it takes 70.6% damage. I call that good! Only problem is speed and lame perks. A+ T-28- Great stats, is fast, has mostly usable perks that are somewhat better than the Maus's, but has no vision, which puts it below the Maus. A KV-6- Worst stats, but the best perk of the game. Reminds you of the Choice in WC4 Between A Sgt with no stars but Has Lv 5 Rumor, A Marshal with no stars and Lv 3 Rumor, and A Sgt with 6 stars in everything and no skills. The fact that you placed the KV-6 at A tier offense me
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Jan 5, 2021 17:23:45 GMT
I forgot there was an S tier.
|
|
|
Post by eeeeef on Jan 5, 2021 17:25:46 GMT
I forgot there was an S tier. The KV-6 deserves the S++ imo along with the Katyusha, they are just that good.
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Jan 5, 2021 17:26:16 GMT
But, "Dang, it is only an A-tier. Better Luck next time, my little honey-bumpkins." All of them are good. Also I forgot to mention the KV-6 is still by far the best Non- Blitzkreig gen Tank, for example Roko, Vatutin, Monty.
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Jan 5, 2021 17:53:32 GMT
I don't know, I am not that far in, I just know their stats. I haven't been able to use the T-28, and the Maus and KV-6 have only been used in Army group.
|
|
|
Post by eeeeef on Jan 5, 2021 17:57:53 GMT
I don't know, I am not that far in, I just know their stats. I haven't been able to use the T-28, and the Maus and KV-6 have only been used in Army group. I am pretty far into the game and let me just say that the KV-6 is a godsend! Paired with a general with panzer leader and some scouting meat shields, the thing can tear apart whole armies!!
|
|
|
Post by Ralyks on Jan 5, 2021 20:59:28 GMT
My decision on this poll is a no-brainer. KV-6 is just ridiculously good while the other two are just "meh". Not only that it can hit for around 200% of its damage, but also the chance of reseting on the secondary tiles it damages makes it absurd. With a top or even decent tank general and some luck, it can murder a whole army on its own. IMO either tone down it (like counterattacks will not trigger the aoe attack) or buff the other two. To this day, with 5 whole campaigns, Allies have the best tank and a substitute tank while the Axis remain with a single tank that is better than nothing but not good either; his first skill is very rarely used (as they are in the frontline and on the move almost every turn, looking for good positioning to make the most of resets) and the second is absurd as the heavy tank you give the Maus for sure will have a general, meaning its counterattacks will hit very hard, often killing enemies, making morale almost impossible to lower unless heavily attacked airborne. T-28 skills are way better than the ones on Maus, but lacking that vision point means it relies on other troops for vision, which will sometimes turn out painful. Maus should be getting the defensive skills T-28 has, or something like "When not moved during the round, reduce damage taken by 40%". Or some extra damage to tanks (as it used a main cannon "based on the 12.8 cm Pak 44 anti-tank field artillery piece")
|
|