|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Mar 16, 2017 18:54:12 GMT
aaa Try this very old advice. lol. I completely forgot about this XD Yeah, I would use this. Easier said than done, granted, for most of those, but the AI tend to follow a distinct path. You can easily use that to your advantage 95% of the time. It actually helped me when I played the 1950/60 conquests as a rookie. It took me 3 tries with different countries (Me! Imagine that!) before I finally won a conquest in that era. That was such a long time ago. Ah memories... um... fuzzy memories that I don't recall fully, lol. |
|
|
|
Post by TK421 on Mar 16, 2017 19:12:00 GMT
lol. I completely forgot about this XD Yeah, I would use this. Easier said than done, granted, for most of those, but the AI tend to follow a distinct path. You can easily use that to your advantage 95% of the time. It actually helped me when I played the 1950/60 conquests as a rookie. It took me 3 tries with different countries (Me! Imagine that!) before I finally won a conquest in that era. That was such a long time ago. Ah memories... um... fuzzy memories that I don't recall fully, lol. Even more lol. I tend to catch onto the strats behind games like this quickly. Yet I'm the one who went through the entire game with basic generals. Osaka, Badaglio, etc. etc. XD |
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Mar 16, 2017 19:47:28 GMT
It actually helped me when I played the 1950/60 conquests as a rookie. It took me 3 tries with different countries (Me! Imagine that!) before I finally won a conquest in that era. That was such a long time ago. Ah memories... um... fuzzy memories that I don't recall fully, lol. Even more lol. I tend to catch onto the strats behind games like this quickly. Yet I'm the one who went through the entire game with basic generals. Osaka, Badaglio, etc. etc. XD Strategy itself wasn't so bad, it was just the execution of the strategy that was difficult, especially when 50/60 is so different from 39/43. It feels so different and unfamiliar when switching from 39/43 to 50/60 for the first time. Of course, once the first completion is done, it becomes much easier to do another conquest. I even completed a 1960 Iran with only Badogilo and unupgraded no-eyes cmdrs, Ozawa pretty late on a carrier in Pacific. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 16, 2017 21:39:44 GMT
I could try this advice, but I do not play wc3 much anymore if I return I will
|
|
|
|
Post by Wilhelm Ritter von Leeb on Mar 18, 2017 21:08:49 GMT
For 1950 UK is quite easy.I finished it with 3ECs and Cunningham😂. Greece and Iran are good alternatives as well(for both eras).
UK in 1960 is a bit harder but still possible.
|
|
|
|
Post by Max Otto von Stierlitz on Mar 19, 2017 23:14:11 GMT
I need help with 1950 and 60 since my allies suck and I'm keep getting nuked every 2-5 turns and worse my allies suck so bad and half of the world is under WTO control. M Keep your gens away from cities and nukes will not be a problem. At least not so big. |
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Mar 20, 2017 7:20:41 GMT
I need help with 1950 and 60 since my allies suck and I'm keep getting nuked every 2-5 turns and worse my allies suck so bad and half of the world is under WTO control. M Keep your gens away from cities and nukes will not be a problem. At least not so big. You realize that this guest posted over a year ago with that request and is unlikely to be here to hear your answer, right? |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 21, 2017 15:01:32 GMT
.
|
|
|
|
Post by Max Otto von Stierlitz on Mar 21, 2017 18:53:13 GMT
You realize that this guest posted over a year ago with that request and is unlikely to be here to hear your answer, right? Haven't noticed the year in topic. But anyway, it's better late than never. |
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Mar 21, 2017 20:56:02 GMT
I did 1950 and 1960 with No Generals(Just my No eyed ones) and its not that hard. Its a war between Socialism and Imperialism. 1960 is Harder but 1950 not much. Pick The Superpower Soviet Union. Its location is very good. You can Invade Europe and take it Quickly(Taking Britain is a bit harder but the rest not much. My strategy is high reliance on Motorized Infantry and Rocket Artillery. Build them in Mass and dont hesitate to invade Neutral Countries and their resources. Despite being Very powerful in the west, The Soviet Union is somewhat weaker in its Eastern Borders. This issue is Not much a problem in 1950 and 1960 because you have a Good town and Nuclear facility. Actually With the usage of General its always easier but its also possible with no generals and normal Units(With no upgrade or low levels of upgrade). Dont forget to produce alot of Nukes and Take enemy Generals out(Sometimes Nuking Cities like London or Washington DC is recommanded too. IMHO Economy is the most important thing in this game. if you take alot of cities and towns You should have no problems bombarding cities like London with Strategic Bombers and Rockets. This way you can whipe the pathetic capitalists of the face of earth.   Iran(My Home Country) is a very good choice too. If you pick Iran be aware that your Little Ally(USSR) might try to be better than you and take the cities you destroy, So again the heavy use of Motorized Infantry is recommanded. Take out Turkey and send a couple of Artillery and Motorized infantry to Saudi Arabia. Then Invade Greece's Only city and Help the Soviets take out Western Europe's Towns. Dont forget to send a couple of Motorized Infantry to India and beyond (In 1950, 1960 China will be attacked by the U.S and its Satellite States and with not much help from the Soviets they will fall quickly, which you can prevent by assisting them and taking Japan and Philippines). Also i recommand Invading the U.S using the pacific ocean and its eastern borders(Specially Canadian shores). , Please take care to not offend people, especially when using misnomers and wrong information. The Imperialists had started to faded away from the Western world after World War I broke out and later they lost power when the colonies in Africa and Asia became independent in the 60's and 70's after World War II. The "war" between NATO and WTO is really a war between the communists and the capitalists in the game. In Europe, the NATO powers' economies are socialist, but they opposes communism. Now.. if you wishes to discuss the politics, I suggest that you use a different forum website for that. The staff here is fairly strict in keeping this forum website focused mainly on the games themselves. We do have a place for non-political off-topic discussions: european-war-4.boards.net/board/1/officers-loungeHere
And yeah, Max Otto von Stierlitz, No problem. I knew you wanted to help out that guest even though he's out there somewhere in the web.  |
|
|
|
Post by Nobunaga Oda on Apr 2, 2017 17:51:04 GMT
Well, I'm more likely than not to play UK so if you do, send motorised infantry into Norway-Sweden, while motorised infantry to Belgium from London, and invade Zurich with the Irish troops. It's a defensive battle from here on out but make sure (a) Norway does NOT fall, (b) France does NOT fall/Communists contained in Germany (c) do NOT be too ambitious in the Balkans, defend Italy as well.
The Ruskies should collapse from turns 15-20 onwards so make your counter attack.
If you do have the SE Asian bases, seize Thailand, the ROC city, march west into western China while attacking into Southern China(for maximum efficiency) but super tanks,artilleries and Generals would worsen the situation so build forts if you can.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2017 22:58:42 GMT
I beat 1950 with britain and america I beat it with britain by sending a army into scandinavia and holding off the soviet onslaught then I took Leningrad and pushed into USSR rest was easy. For us I just built nukes and slammed armies and took coastal Chinese towns and slowly invaded inland and also sent troops to Europe and took Lyon back because it was soviet then I took over from two sides
|
|
|
|
Post by Wilhelm Ritter von Leeb on Apr 6, 2017 19:02:56 GMT
Friendly advice for NATO countries:
Just dont try to take Khabarovsk from Siberia.
|
|
|
|
Post by TheMcDiddler on Apr 7, 2017 22:17:53 GMT
I just beat Norway 1950 with Govorov it is really easy Hah. I beat Norway 1960 without major generals. I used Meyer and a 3-star tank custom. |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Apr 7, 2017 22:49:03 GMT
Friendly advice for NATO countries: Just dont try to take Khabarovsk from Siberia. And I'm giving an advice just the reverse of yours: If you are marching toward Asia in 1960, go to Khabarovsk through Siberia. The range of Chinese paraspam can be calculated. If you build a Maginot 8 hexes away from Chinese airport, your troops will be able to reach Khabarovsk and fort-pocket it safely, well, as long as Meretskov is no longer there. Why not 1950? Because of Novikov, and there's a city in the southwest of Chongking. |
|
