|
|
Post by eeeeef on Dec 18, 2020 19:16:43 GMT
 Stats Infantry 2 Artillery 3 Armor 3 Navy 0 Air 0 Movement 2 Skills Desperate lvl1 (decrease moral of enemy on counterattack) Inspiration lvl2 (increase moral of allies in 1 grid) Rumor lvl2 (extra decrease enemy moral when annihilating enemy around them) Price 905 |
|
|
|
Post by eeeeef on Dec 18, 2020 19:18:35 GMT
Idk about this guy I mean he can use a rocket and annihilate 3 stacks in 1 hit to trigger rumor trice and then some if he is on a tank but idk since I haven't tried it yet but he seems decent
|
|
|
|
Post by zink on Dec 18, 2020 20:34:48 GMT
Personally I don't like land hybrids that arn't air since it makes the generals more expensive. I'd probably put him on arty and make him the center of an army group. Pretty interesting general since all of his skills are morale-based.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nobunaga Oda on Dec 19, 2020 3:46:36 GMT
Personally I don't like land hybrids that arn't air since it makes the generals more expensive. I'd probably put him on arty and make him the center of an army group. Pretty interesting general since all of his skills are morale-based. Yeah. I'd mark him as a supporting hybrid based on his skills. Morale is important since Rumour isn't the only factor to track in this game. |
|
|
|
Post by truhses on Dec 21, 2020 4:48:45 GMT
He played twice for the French group center and had many fights with de Gaulle, did not notice a particular decline in morale. Rumor does not work or does not work as well as in wc4. If this is true, then de Gaulle is useless ...
|
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Dec 21, 2020 13:59:46 GMT
I understand that for many French people De Gaulle is a real hero. But manipulations with moral alone are not enough for top tier general, imo.
|
|
|
|
Post by SolidLight on Dec 21, 2020 14:19:18 GMT
I understand that for many French people De Gaulle is a real hero. But manipulations with moral alone are not enough for top tier general, imo. The trouble I have with morale is that the most damaging thing you can do is to kill stacks. But killing stacks means getting a unit closer to death and usually extra attacks for you. It’s really hard in my opinion to get the morale down to 0. Except in naval fights since morale seems to recover a lot slower and raising morale is also harder. |
|
|
|
Post by eeeeef on Dec 21, 2020 14:32:08 GMT
I understand that for many French people De Gaulle is a real hero. But manipulations with moral alone are not enough for top tier general, imo. The trouble I have with morale is that the most damaging thing you can do is to kill stacks. But killing stacks means getting a unit closer to death and usually extra attacks for you. It’s really hard in my opinion to get the morale down to 0. Except in naval fights since morale seems to recover a lot slower and raising morale is also harder. In naval fights one can use dive bomb + torpedos to cripple a fleet's morale |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Dec 21, 2020 17:37:20 GMT
I understand that for many French people De Gaulle is a real hero. But manipulations with moral alone are not enough for top tier general, imo. The trouble I have with morale is that the most damaging thing you can do is to kill stacks. But killing stacks means getting a unit closer to death and usually extra attacks for you. It’s really hard in my opinion to get the morale down to 0. Except in naval fights since morale seems to recover a lot slower and raising morale is also harder. I don't have Air force general yet, but probably such generals like Kisselring or Dowding may help... |
|
|
|
Post by eeeeef on Dec 21, 2020 17:41:50 GMT
The trouble I have with morale is that the most damaging thing you can do is to kill stacks. But killing stacks means getting a unit closer to death and usually extra attacks for you. It’s really hard in my opinion to get the morale down to 0. Except in naval fights since morale seems to recover a lot slower and raising morale is also harder. I don't have Air force general yet, but probably such generals like Kisselring or Dowding may help... I personally have kesselring and I highly recommend him if you have spare medals! He does wonders even in the Pasific! |
|
|
|
Post by eeeeef on Dec 21, 2020 18:33:27 GMT
Just found out rumor lvl2 decrease enemy morale by 5, de gaulle your a 3 star now
|
|
|
|
Post by zink on Dec 29, 2020 4:39:32 GMT
You guys can throw around the 5 star or 4 star rating, but would anyone actually use him when there are more specialized generals in their area like Govorov or Vatutin that have way better skils and cost around 180 less. In what situation would I want de Gaulle over someone who could do tons of damage.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Feb 9, 2021 15:30:03 GMT
4 stars, not because he is a strong general, but because he is the best support in the game.
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Apr 8, 2021 13:39:24 GMT
I think this guy is really really bad. Even worse than his wc3 version.
Basically no useful skills,
For good allies tanks we have: Vatutin, Rokossovsky, Montgomery, Patton, Devers, Timoshenko, and Leclrec who I would rather use over De Gaulle.
For good artillery generals, the allies have a ton of generals with artillery leader skills (govorov, voronov, chuikov, simonds) so he is very easily outclassed here too.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Apr 8, 2021 13:44:14 GMT
I think this guy is really really bad. Even worse than his wc3 version. Basically no useful skills, For good allies tanks we have: Vatutin, Rokossovsky, Montgomery, Patton, Devers, Timoshenko, and Leclrec who I would rather use over De Gaulle. For good artillery generals, the allies have a ton of generals with artillery leader skills (govorov, voronov, chuikov, simonds) so he is very easily outclassed here too. However, although I agree he is a very bad general, he is an excellent support. That being said, he is most definitely not worth 905 medals. |
|
