|
|
Post by eeeeef on Dec 20, 2020 4:53:54 GMT
 Stats Infantry 1 Artillery 0 Armor 3 Navy 0 Air 0 Movement 1 Skills Scout lvl2 (+10% exp when detecting an enemy during march) Armored Assault lvl2 (+24% critical chance when commanding armor) Ace Forced lvl2 (+80% exp during combat) Price 645 |
|
|
|
Post by eeeeef on Dec 20, 2020 5:00:50 GMT
The worst price performer in the game imo, the only thing saving him from 1 star is armored assault
|
|
|
|
Post by SolidLight on Dec 20, 2020 7:42:54 GMT
The best F2P general with lv2 armored assault. Too bad he sucks.
|
|
|
|
Post by SolidLight on Dec 21, 2020 18:27:45 GMT
He should have had lv2 Snow Fighting just for lolz.
|
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Dec 21, 2020 19:02:25 GMT
Thanks to cloud save/load we can test many generals in action. Hoth is worse than Rundstedt on heavy tanks, imo. I think survivability will be the main problem for Axis in later campaigns.
|
|
|
|
Post by eeeeef on Dec 21, 2020 19:07:33 GMT
Thanks to cloud save/load we can test many generals in action. Hoth is worse than Rundstedt on heavy tanks, imo. I think survivability will be the main problem for Axis in later campaigns. I personally won't be buying runstedt anytime soon because of my "kill them before they kill you" playstyle and I feel like runstedt wouldn't really for well in my team since all my main gens have 2 movement or more runstedt's abysmal speed more apparent so I would actually prefer hoth to runstedt on tanks plus hoth's sick crit rate will probably make him a beast on defending maus tanks |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Dec 22, 2020 4:06:35 GMT
Thanks to cloud save/load we can test many generals in action. Hoth is worse than Rundstedt on heavy tanks, imo. I think survivability will be the main problem for Axis in later campaigns. I personally won't be buying runstedt anytime soon because of my "kill them before they kill you" playstyle and I feel like runstedt wouldn't really for well in my team since all my main gens have 2 movement or more runstedt's abysmal speed more apparent so I would actually prefer hoth to runstedt on tanks plus hoth's sick crit rate will probably make him a beast on defending maus tanks It's probably the only one reason to hire him... |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Dec 23, 2020 10:36:01 GMT
Yet, survivability is a factor we have to take into account as well. It is the end of the first special chapter WF1944. I replenished Rommel's unit 5 or 6 times, but Rundstedt doesn't need it at all. It is a strong argument for using Rundstedt as a second heavy tank general, imo.  |
|
|
|
Post by eeeeef on Dec 23, 2020 10:47:42 GMT
Yet, survivability is a factor we have to take into account as well. It is the end of the first special chapter WF1944. I replenished Rommel's unit 5 or 6 times, but Rundstedt doesn't need it at all. It is a strong argument for using Rundstedt as a second heavy tank general, imo. If you have 2 heavy tanks available then I'd say many people would prefer guderian on the heavy tank instead of Rundstedt |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Dec 23, 2020 11:33:24 GMT
Yet, survivability is a factor we have to take into account as well. It is the end of the first special chapter WF1944. I replenished Rommel's unit 5 or 6 times, but Rundstedt doesn't need it at all. It is a strong argument for using Rundstedt as a second heavy tank general, imo. If you have 2 heavy tanks available then I'd say many people would prefer guderian on the heavy tank instead of Rundstedt Actually I don't think so... Two heavy tanks are not so common. And one top tier tank general (Rommel or Guderian) is usually enough. So, either we hire both putting Rommel on heavy tanks and Guderian on medium tanks (and occasionally on heavy as well), or we hire only one of them using other possible alternatives (Bock, Rundstedt, Messe) as second tank commanders. Rundstedt is expensive but I think he can fill the gaps on many ocasiones. But, of course, it is not a self-evident and obvious decision. I simply like universal skills, and Rundstedt has two of them. |
|
|
|
Post by eeeeef on Dec 23, 2020 11:40:56 GMT
If you have 2 heavy tanks available then I'd say many people would prefer guderian on the heavy tank instead of Rundstedt Actually I don't think so... Two heavy tanks are not so common. And one top tier tank general (Rommel or Guderian) is usually enough. So, either we hire both putting Rommel on heavy tanks and Guderian on medium tanks (and occasionally on heavy as well), or we hire only one of them using other possible alternatives (Bock, Rundstedt, Messe) as second tank commanders. Rundstedt is expensive but I think he can fill the gaps on many ocasiones. But, of course, it is not a self-evident and obvious decision. I simply like universal skills, and Rundstedt has two of them. But isn't fire supression a weaker, universal, more consistent blitzkrieg which you don't like on heavies |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Dec 23, 2020 11:56:33 GMT
Actually I don't think so... Two heavy tanks are not so common. And one top tier tank general (Rommel or Guderian) is usually enough. So, either we hire both putting Rommel on heavy tanks and Guderian on medium tanks (and occasionally on heavy as well), or we hire only one of them using other possible alternatives (Bock, Rundstedt, Messe) as second tank commanders. Rundstedt is expensive but I think he can fill the gaps on many ocasiones. But, of course, it is not a self-evident and obvious decision. I simply like universal skills, and Rundstedt has two of them. But isn't fire supression a weaker, universal, more consistent blitzkrieg which you don't like on heavies It is rather a combination of Fire suppression and Plunder, that I like. The latter is exceptionally efficient on heavy tanks, and Plunder is a percentage based skill... |
|
|
|
Post by eeeeef on Dec 23, 2020 11:59:52 GMT
But isn't fire supression a weaker, universal, more consistent blitzkrieg which you don't like on heavies It is rather a combination of Fire suppression and Plunder, that I like. The latter is exceptionally efficient on heavy tanks, and Plunder is a percentage based skill... I understand plunder but if fire suppression is so good on heavies why isn't it the same for blitzkrieg |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Dec 23, 2020 14:46:18 GMT
It is rather a combination of Fire suppression and Plunder, that I like. The latter is exceptionally efficient on heavy tanks, and Plunder is a percentage based skill... I understand plunder but if fire suppression is so good on heavies why isn't it the same for blitzkrieg Because Blitzkrieg isn't supported by Plunder  As I said it is rather a combination of two skills than two skills taken in isolation. I haven't said that Blitzkrieg is a bad skill either, I said it is less effective on heavy tanks, and therefore I prefer Rommel's multiple attacks instead. And it is something hard to dispute, imo. Blitzkrieg is a situational skill on heavy tanks. |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Dec 23, 2020 17:24:48 GMT
Another example of Rundstedt's survivability. Rommel and Messe are long dead but Rundstedt is alive and well to finish the task  |
|
As I said it is rather a combination of two skills than two skills taken in isolation. I haven't said that Blitzkrieg is a bad skill either, I said it is less effective on heavy tanks, and therefore I prefer Rommel's multiple attacks instead. And it is something hard to dispute, imo. Blitzkrieg is a situational skill on heavy tanks. 
