|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Jan 12, 2021 14:15:36 GMT
When should it come out? And I mean a major update, not making Operation Weserubung mind-numbingly easy, as if it wasn't before, even for me, a complete noob.
|
|
|
|
Post by Don Quixote de la Mancha on Jan 12, 2021 17:18:35 GMT
When should it come out? And I mean a major update, not making Operation Weserubung mind-numbingly easy, as if it wasn't before, even for me, a complete noob. I am predicting it comes out late January early Febuary maximum, adding pacific united front 1942 and campaign 1945 in the pacific |
|
|
|
Post by zabadanov86 on Jan 12, 2021 18:46:18 GMT
This game without eastern front 1944-1945 is just not complete. Attempt to put two Soviet missions in western front 1944 campaing is ridiculous.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ralyks on Jan 13, 2021 0:05:45 GMT
Sadly I don't think a Eastern European front will make it, at least on the next big patch, but I doubt it'll be a thing later, precisely because on the western Campaign, they added those 2 ending missions, which along with the whole 1941 eastern, makes up for enough USSR.
My bet will be what is already announced but disabled, Pacific 1945 campaign, Army Group Pacific and 1945 Pacific United Front. Hopefully we see a new game mode also.
Later on they should add Europe 1944 (not Eastern or Western, Europe as a whole, but less zoomed in), which looks quite the chance to make a gigantic, realistic and entertaining scenario to play.
And hopefully post WW2 stuff is added later on, like early Cold War, but so far it's not looking much like it... I would not like at all it being so focused just on WW2, like we didn't have enough ET games about it already, though I did enjoy it again, I guess because it was all remade and the new mechanics.
|
|
|
|
Post by HangryBird on Jan 13, 2021 1:29:28 GMT
Sadly I don't think a Eastern European front will make it, at least on the next big patch, but I doubt it'll be a thing later, precisely because on the western Campaign, they added those 2 ending missions, which along with the whole 1941 eastern, makes up for enough USSR. My bet will be what is already announced but disabled, Pacific 1945 campaign, Army Group Pacific and 1945 Pacific United Front. Hopefully we see a new game mode also. Later on they should add Europe 1944 (not Eastern or Western, Europe as a whole, but less zoomed in), which looks quite the chance to make a gigantic, realistic and entertaining scenario to play. And hopefully post WW2 stuff is added later on, like early Cold War, but so far it's not looking much like it... I would not like at all it being so focused just on WW2, like we didn't have enough ET games about it already, though I did enjoy it again, I guess because it was all remade and the new mechanics. Yeah I think the Soviets have their campaign done already. The Eastern Front was about pushing the Germans from Moscow and pushing them back into Germany. The Western Front was about the Soviets finishing the job and taking Berlin. Really, it's just the name of the campaign that bugs me. I don't think there will be any Cold War content either. But on the contrary, that actually makes me happy. I didn't like how WC4 handled the Cold War. It felt like it was just shoved into the game as a sweetener to make it more interesting, especially the 1950 conquest. I'm all for Cold War content, but I think it would be better as a standalone game, rather than being shoved with WW2 content. Both EW6's are guilty of this too because they combined Victorian Era conflicts with the Napoleonic Wars and WW1 respectively. |
|
|
|
Post by eeeeef on Jan 13, 2021 1:35:22 GMT
I don't think that cold War campaigns will be added because of the whole "allies can only fight in allied camps" thing but I'm still hopeful of a final confrontation with the nazis by the allied forces in Antarctica.
|
|
|
|
Post by HangryBird on Jan 13, 2021 1:46:50 GMT
I don't think that cold War campaigns will be added because of the whole "allies can only fight in allied camps" thing but I'm still hopeful of a final confrontation with the nazis by the allied forces in Antarctica. Oh yeah, that's a big problem for a cold war campaign. Which axis generals will go to NATO and which will go to Warsaw Pact? I never liked the Antarctica mission, it just felt so out of place. |
|
|
|
Post by yuanzhong on Jan 13, 2021 1:50:41 GMT
May be Alien or Terroist again ^o^ .
|
|
|
|
Post by HangryBird on Jan 13, 2021 2:52:23 GMT
May be Alien or Terroist again ^o^ . I didn't like them either. While they definitely came from nowhere, my main grievance against them is that they are unplayable. |
|
|
|
Post by kanue on Jan 13, 2021 13:13:20 GMT
May be Alien or Terroist again ^o^ . I think I recall seeing a modder (don't remember who) mentioned about having terrorists as an endgame content somewhere in a long ago thread. Can't guarantee if I did not dream this up. |
|
|
|
Post by eeeeef on Jan 13, 2021 13:18:58 GMT
May be Alien or Terroist again ^o^ . I think I recall seeing a modder (don't remember who) mentioned about having terrorists as an endgame content somewhere in a long ago thread. Can't guarantee if I did not dream this up. .org/]  [/url] You're not dreaming |
|
|
|
Post by Ralyks on Jan 13, 2021 14:30:37 GMT
I like having extra end game content. Like HangryBird said, it was a shame that in all campaigns and conquests we could play both sides except for the last one, that you will always be facing the terrorists. Like I really missed being able to play Conquest and Campaign with terrorists. Their troops were top of the line, having also special perks, like their cruisers being a naval KV6 or artillery having antiair or infantry having both extra damage to buildings and armored while also having no terrain penalty... these troops looked really cool. Simulated scenarios like the Nazis invading USA or NATO invading the Communists secret base in Antarctica (among many others) were a nice added bonus, so the "Normal" and "Hard" difficulty for each, being similar scenarios but you playing on a different part of it. I don't think this will be the game to see such thing. World Conqueror 5 has all the chances (if it comes to exist, which I bet will do as ET will have to keep releasing games to keen gaining income) |
|
|
|
Post by zink on Jan 13, 2021 21:37:39 GMT
I like having extra end game content. Like HangryBird said, it was a shame that in all campaigns and conquests we could play both sides except for the last one, that you will always be facing the terrorists. Like I really missed being able to play Conquest and Campaign with terrorists. Their troops were top of the line, having also special perks, like their cruisers being a naval KV6 or artillery having antiair or infantry having both extra damage to buildings and armored while also having no terrain penalty... these troops looked really cool. Simulated scenarios like the Nazis invading USA or NATO invading the Communists secret base in Antarctica (among many others) were a nice added bonus, so the "Normal" and "Hard" difficulty for each, being similar scenarios but you playing on a different part of it. I don't think this will be the game to see such thing. World Conqueror 5 has all the chances (if it comes to exist, which I bet will do as ET will have to keep releasing games to keen gaining income) Easytech has already done everything possible when it comes to WW2. Unless they focus a lot more on the cold war and making a war a small campagin instead of just one mission or even special mission in the previous ones, I doubt we'll be seeing another wc game. |
|
|
|
Post by Ralyks on Jan 13, 2021 22:50:43 GMT
Thing is World Conqueror is not just for WW2, like Glory of Generals 1 and Glory of Generals 1 Pacific were, or like this Glory of Generals 3 is turning out to be. They only have WW2 content.
World Conqueror 4 went from WW2 all the way to Cold War and then Terrorists.
IIRC World Conqueror 3 had around the same amount of content about WW2 than Cold War (there was a 1950 and 1960 conquest for example)
And I don't think I played World Conqueror 2 nor 1 (though the latter I can't even find on the Google Store... was it deleted?)
Well, point is World Conqueror is not as focused on WW2 like Glory of Generals.
|
|
|
|
Post by zink on Jan 13, 2021 23:12:02 GMT
Thing is World Conqueror is not just for WW2, like Glory of Generals 1 and Glory of Generals 1 Pacific were, or like this Glory of Generals 3 is turning out to be. They only have WW2 content. World Conqueror 4 went from WW2 all the way to Cold War and then Terrorists. IIRC World Conqueror 3 had around the same amount of content about WW2 than Cold War (there was a 1950 and 1960 conquest for example) And I don't think I played World Conqueror 2 nor 1 (though the latter I can't even find on the Google Store... was it deleted?) Well, point is World Conqueror is not as focused on WW2 like Glory of Generals. Like I was saying, with European conqueror they went left Napoleon & the American revolutions (skipping EC5) and worked on more modern wars like WW1. They'll probably leave WW2 and focus on the Cold war and maybe some terrorists/aliens. |
|
