|
|
Post by John Marston on May 12, 2021 7:29:33 GMT
Some population couldn't had produced food for the huge army and population. And how does victory in the East solve that problem? It's just that the soldiers are alive and are transferred from the east to the west. And if Germany never lacked Weapons and Ammunition, then why couldn't they clear the blockade? Victory in East got them Ukraine- the bread basket. I meant land army's ammunition. Blockade didn't meant they didn't traded at all, they traded through neutral countries especially Sweden. Yeah. I do realize that Blockade meant they didn't trade at all. Just a lot less trading. And even if they got Ukraine, it would take long to transport them to the western front. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 12, 2021 7:31:31 GMT
Victory in East got them Ukraine- the bread basket. I meant land army's ammunition. Blockade didn't meant they didn't traded at all, they traded through neutral countries especially Sweden. Yeah. I do realize that Blockade meant they didn't trade at all. Just a lot less trading. And even if they got Ukraine, it would take long to transport them to the western front. It wouldn't take a year, at most it will take 2 weeks, but the war and socialist turmoil has meant that Ukraine was unstable so they sent 750,000 soldiers there to secure grain by securing the positions of large landowners which was going to take few months and situation has started to improve but socialists were really got huge funds from jews somewhere |
|
|
|
Post by John Marston on May 12, 2021 7:34:11 GMT
Yeah. I do realize that Blockade meant they didn't trade at all. Just a lot less trading. And even if they got Ukraine, it would take long to transport them to the western front. It wouldn't take a year, at most it will take 2 weeks, but the war and socialist turmoil has meant that Ukraine was unstable so they sent 750,000 soldiers there to secure grain by securing the positions of large landowners. Ok. I agree on this. But France wouldn't have survived without British aid. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 12, 2021 7:34:48 GMT
It wouldn't take a year, at most it will take 2 weeks, but the war and socialist turmoil has meant that Ukraine was unstable so they sent 750,000 soldiers there to secure grain by securing the positions of large landowners. Ok. I agree on this. But France wouldn't have survived without British aid. I also agree |
|
|
|
Post by John Marston on May 12, 2021 7:35:34 GMT
Ok. I agree on this. But France wouldn't have survived without British aid. I also agree And that makes Britain MVP because they supported France, which bore the brunt in the east. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 12, 2021 7:37:19 GMT
Yeah. I do realize that Blockade meant they didn't trade at all. Just a lot less trading. And even if they got Ukraine, it would take long to transport them to the western front. It wouldn't take a year, at most it will take 2 weeks, but the war and socialist turmoil has meant that Ukraine was unstable so they sent 750,000 soldiers there to secure grain by securing the positions of large landowners which was going to take few months and situation has started to improve but socialists were really got huge funds from jews somewhere Germany has only 50 percent of all its troops on Western Front, others were on other fronts. Mackenson felt his army that was in Romania strong enough that he began planning a counterattack on his own against the allies on Balkans after fall of Bulgaria. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 12, 2021 7:38:15 GMT
And that makes Britain MVP because they supported France, which bore the brunt in the east. But that do not means British would have won on their own, they would have performed way worse than France would have done alone. |
|
|
|
Post by John Marston on May 12, 2021 7:41:15 GMT
And that makes Britain MVP because they supported France, which bore the brunt in the east. But that do not means British would have won on their own, they would have performed way worse than France would have done alone. If France was neutral, there is no possiblity of War because of the English Channel seperating Germany and Britain. Even if there was a one on one fight, Britain would have performed better because they have complete domination of the seas. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 12, 2021 7:42:45 GMT
But that do not means British would have won on their own, they would have performed way worse than France would have done alone. If France was neutral, there is no possiblity of War because of the English Channel seperating Germany and Britain. Even if there was a one on one fight, Britain would have performed better because they have complete domination of the seas. They cannot do anything with their navy like they were not able to even harm Napoleon's France on their own. France joined the war without Britain, Britain couldn't even defeat Nazis on their own. |
|
|
|
Post by John Marston on May 12, 2021 7:49:05 GMT
If France was neutral, there is no possiblity of War because of the English Channel seperating Germany and Britain. Even if there was a one on one fight, Britain would have performed better because they have complete domination of the seas. They cannot do anything with their navy like they were not able to even harm Napoleon's France on their own. France joined the war without Britain, Britain couldn't even defeat Nazis on their own. They could have captured an area by bombarding it, bringing an army and going on from there. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 12, 2021 8:52:19 GMT
They cannot do anything with their navy like they were not able to even harm Napoleon's France on their own. France joined the war without Britain, Britain couldn't even defeat Nazis on their own. They could have captured an area by bombarding it, bringing an army and going on from there. They don't have the capabilities, German Artillery would have bombed the hell out of those troops. This didn't even succeed against Napoleon's few thousand Infantry, would they succeed against the might of German army. As Moltke joked about British Army once- if the army will ever invade the continent, I will send the Belgian police to arrest them. |
|
|
|
Post by Pietro Badoglio on May 14, 2021 7:23:17 GMT
Ofcourse, Britain. It should also have been like Central powers one. Who was the second mvp.
|
|
