|
Post by NotRandom on Apr 24, 2021 23:24:17 GMT
Both are beast for the air, but Yamamoto is good on navy while Kesselring is better on army.
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Apr 24, 2021 23:53:48 GMT
Both are beast for the air, but Yamamoto is good on navy while Kesselring is better on army. Correction: Yamamoto is better on air, while Kesselring is better on land. Yamamoto's navy stars are useless.
|
|
|
Post by HangryBird on Apr 25, 2021 0:03:30 GMT
Both are beast for the air, but Yamamoto is good on navy while Kesselring is better on army. Correction: Yamamoto is better on air, while Kesselring is better on land. Yamamoto's navy stars are useless. You know what he meant. Yamamoto is better on carriers and Kesselring is better on infantry.
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Apr 25, 2021 0:06:19 GMT
Correction: Yamamoto is better on air, while Kesselring is better on land. Yamamoto's navy stars are useless. You know what he meant. Yamamoto is better on carriers and Kesselring is better on infantry. Okay, but even so, I find Yamamoto only marginally better than Kesselring on carriers. Cities are not priority 1 as a carrier. +1000 points for Yamamoto as he has a Thanos chin.
|
|
|
Post by HangryBird on Apr 25, 2021 0:10:43 GMT
You know what he meant. Yamamoto is better on carriers and Kesselring is better on infantry. Okay, but even so, I find Yamamoto only marginally better than Kesselring on carriers. Cities are not priority 1 as a carrier. +1000 points for Yamamoto as he has a Thanos chin. Yep, Yamamoto doesn't bring too much advantages to the table when comparing the two on carriers. Hence my vote for Kesselring.
|
|
|
Post by STILETT0 on Apr 25, 2021 0:11:56 GMT
Both are beast for the air, but Yamamoto is good on navy while Kesselring is better on army. The idea of saving up for navy generals in GoG games is a bit pointless. Just upgrade your navy tech. You get one navy general, the number that you need for free when you need them on each side. Kesselring is like Student in WC3. He has a reasonable amount of damage for infantry/air, while Yamamoto doesn't have the artillery ability that so many people appreciate. My vote goes to Kesselring, because he is a good choice in all scenarios.
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Apr 25, 2021 4:00:35 GMT
Never needed air gen that I had to use as a fighter. Having hybrid air gen is totally pointless imo. In case someone plan to invest in air gen this gen should be the best air gen in the game. And it is Yamamoto.
|
|
|
Post by 曹操 on Apr 25, 2021 4:16:35 GMT
Kesselring ofc, he is really useful at Conquest and Army Group mode since he can be a paratroop gen unlike Yamamoto where you need Carrier to use him
|
|
|
Post by eeeeef on Apr 25, 2021 4:56:15 GMT
Kesselring, Yamamoto's naval stars are practically useless since Riccardi and Ozawa are more competent admirals and carriers only use air so that just leaves air and land capabilities, in air Yamamoto has a slight edge in carpet Bombing however Kesselring dominates on land so my vote goes to Kesselring.
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Apr 25, 2021 5:09:11 GMT
Kesselring ofc, he is really useful at Conquest and Army Group mode since he can be a paratroop gen unlike Yamamoto where you need Carrier to use him What prevents Yamamoto from using as paratrooper? You can put him on arty or tank as well. Why do You need carrier to use Yamamoto? With Kasselring we trade 15 air attack for 15 inf attack. Why do I need this additional infantry attack with air gen? I will easily compensate it with higher air damage. What is the point? Especially if You speak about conquest mode. You don't need to focus units outside cities at all particularly with air strikes.
|
|
|
Post by irvin on Apr 25, 2021 9:34:38 GMT
I have Kesserling and he is just good as air gen can be Find him very useful on carriers with additional 12 damage (inspiration rush), just select targets with low morale
|
|
|
Post by willianwallace on Apr 25, 2021 15:10:05 GMT
i personally think kesselring is better in both carriers and airports, in the naval battles the navy unitys morale decrease quickly so the combination between dive bombing and victory rush are very useful. When you go to attack a city, Yamamoto has an advantage but if you decrease the unity morale at the city victory rush can be equal to carpet bombing. plus kesselring has 3 medals in infantry which is very useful and yamamoto's 4 naval medals it's a little useless.
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Apr 25, 2021 15:30:53 GMT
i personally think kesselring is better in both carriers and airports, in the naval battles the navy unitys morale decrease quickly so the combination between dive bombing and victory rush are very useful. When you go to attack a city, Yamamoto has an advantage but if you decrease the unity morale at the city victory rush can be equal to carpet bombing. plus kesselring has 3 medals in infantry which is very useful and yamamoto's 4 naval medals it's a little useless. Guys can somebody explain/translate words "very useful"? I mean what exactly is meant when speaking about 3 inf stars alone? Don't overestimate trashy generals. Good generals make difference if compared to non-general units. Trashy gens - don't have that difference. High and low Tech level is something that is important, same as good gen and bad gen. Here are some comparison screens. Non-general unit attacks Now I put Model (3 inf stars - same efficient with infantry as Kesselring) You call it very useful? There is some difference, but nothing that could change the tide even in minor way. I think letting Kesselring to fight is a good way to lose air general during AI phase of the turn. So I really don't understand what is "very useful".
|
|
|
Post by willianwallace on Apr 25, 2021 15:45:00 GMT
[quote author=" andrei" source="/post/283382/thread Sorry for my mistake(2 times), i didn't considereted my tech level (which is 6), i guess the "very useful" its not correct word (sorry for that) maybe just a extra, at the beginning of the game he is not a priority.
|
|
|
Post by irvin on Apr 25, 2021 15:58:15 GMT
I use Kesserling as 2nd inf gen when needed. It makes difference on (again) units with low morale But this is complementary to his main air ability
|
|