|
Post by John Marston on Apr 29, 2021 13:45:50 GMT
So does those count more than conquering Austria, Prussia, Spain, Italy, Naples? I never said that Yes yes. Hear me out. I know you never said that. But looking at his wins vs Napoleon's wins, there is a stark difference here itself. So I claim that Napoleon is better than both of them
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 29, 2021 13:48:53 GMT
I think your thread is sufficiently answered already
|
|
|
Post by John Marston on Apr 29, 2021 13:50:27 GMT
I think your thread is sufficiently answered already It is? Maybe? But I would go on for ever, even if I have to go around a black hole (going around a black hole slows the time around you)
|
|
|
Post by Inactive user on Apr 29, 2021 13:52:06 GMT
Yes yes. Hear me out. I know you never said that. But looking at his wins vs Napoleon's wins, there is a stark difference here itself. So I claim that Napoleon is better than both of them The other guys may be brilliant commanders and great leaders, they didn't win nearly as much battles as Napoleon. Plus, Napoleon managed to almost make it to vieanna with his army. He battled the center of the world, Europe, and came out victorious in battle after battle. Napoleon was the greatest general France ever had. (With ceasar a close second.) ALso back to the story of alexander. He conquered countries who had just been destroyed due to the greek-persian wars, macedonia had a massive army ready. ALexander was great, but not as great as napoleon.
|
|
|
Post by Inactive user on Apr 29, 2021 13:52:54 GMT
I think your thread is sufficiently answered already It is? Maybe? But I would go on for ever, even if I have to go around a black hole (going around a black hole slows the time around you) Yes, but you also die due to the massive gravitational forces
|
|
|
Post by Inactive user on Apr 29, 2021 13:56:35 GMT
John Marston, I can keep talking once i get home. That'll be in 40-50 mins.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 29, 2021 13:59:22 GMT
Well my last word to this thread:napoleon wasn't great. And if Europe being the center of the world.... Well arrogant maybe?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 29, 2021 14:16:02 GMT
Or racism being the whites the best race something like that?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 29, 2021 14:21:59 GMT
Well I think it has nothing to do with the question if napoleon was great or greatest of all
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Apr 29, 2021 14:23:12 GMT
Napoleon was mathematically the greatest general in history.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 29, 2021 14:28:02 GMT
John Marston , Kind of off topic, but Napoleon was one of the greatest military minds ever. It's a shame how easytech made him a general that can easily be replaced, in almost all of its games That gives me another reason to hate easytech I know what is the first reason.
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Apr 29, 2021 14:28:18 GMT
Well my last word to this thread:napoleon wasn't great. And if Europe being the center of the world.... Well arrogant maybe? Europe, at least after the decline of the Ancient Near East, is rightfully considered to be the center of the world, at least until after WW2, when it Shifted to the Pacific.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 29, 2021 14:33:29 GMT
That gives me another reason to hate easytech They do make good games though, but the generals don't match with their real life performance. I've done some research and somethimes the difference is just horrible. For example Mcclellan. He is/was a god in EW6 1914, but he was one of the worst union commanders in real life. Johnston, he was an ok general, but not that great. He is also God tier. And Grant, he is one of the worst in-game, but he defeated Robert Lee, which is impressive. Grant literally threw his men at Lee, He knew about his Numerical superiority, even Sherman was better general. Also, Johnston was one of the best generals of confederacy, as J. Davis said," His death was the turning point in our war effort".
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Apr 29, 2021 14:35:48 GMT
They do make good games though, but the generals don't match with their real life performance. I've done some research and somethimes the difference is just horrible. For example Mcclellan. He is/was a god in EW6 1914, but he was one of the worst union commanders in real life. Johnston, he was an ok general, but not that great. He is also God tier. And Grant, he is one of the worst in-game, but he defeated Robert Lee, which is impressive. Grant literally threw his men at Lee, He knew about his Numerical superiority, even Sherman was better general. Also, Johnston was one of the best generals of confederacy, as J. Davis said," His death was the turning point in our war effort". Died because he wouldn't wear a hat at a funeral.
|
|
|
Post by Inactive user on Apr 29, 2021 14:51:10 GMT
Well my last word to this thread:napoleon wasn't great. And if Europe being the center of the world.... Well arrogant maybe? Not arrogance, truth. Europe was the center of the world a that time. China was solving an internal crisis. Africa was just a bunch of clans. Middle east was one empire, and America hasn't been discovered yet. Europe was colonizing and was really powerfull at that time.
|
|