adam31
First Lieutenant
Posts: 48
|
Post by adam31 on May 12, 2021 9:36:17 GMT
Welll... We need to talk bout Tank.
Medium Tank
For Axis
Simple....Guerdian with Panther
For Ally
Simple.... Patton with what u want to
Heavy Tank
For Axis
Simple...Rommel with Maus
For Ally
Welll...here we go
Some people said the main goal of tank is to kill Infantry so Monty is best
Some people said the main goal of tank is to cover our units in fronline by defeating enemy tanks face to face so Roko is best and only KV6 is useful in Heavy Tank Special force and Roko is suitable gen to use it than Monty.
Choosing Medium T for axis is easy
C M T for ally is easy
C Heavy T for axis is still easy
C H T for ally is .....Bruhhhhhhh
How do you think?
Roko or Monty
for me... i choose simply
Who is expensive?
More Expensive More Greater Power
So.....Monty for me
Leave a message if u also in trouble
|
|
|
|
Post by Alexyx on May 12, 2021 10:17:01 GMT
I can't agree with Heavy tank for Axis. It's not like Rommel is better there. Guderian still outperforms him on HT. The thing is - Guderian is amazing on both MT and HT, while Rommel on MT is at most mediocre.
For Allies KV-6 works with Rokossovsky and Vatutin. Monty is good on Armored Car.
But honestly, Manstein is much better for KV-6 as well as Boris
|
|
|
|
Post by Joseph Stalin on May 12, 2021 11:02:38 GMT
Welll... We need to talk bout Tank. Medium Tank For Axis Simple....Guerdian with Panther For Ally Simple.... Patton with what u want to Heavy Tank For Axis Simple...Rommel with Maus For Ally Welll...here we go Some people said the main goal of tank is to kill Infantry so Monty is best Some people said the main goal of tank is to cover our units in fronline by defeating enemy tanks face to face so Roko is best and only KV6 is useful in Heavy Tank Special force and Roko is suitable gen to use it than Monty. Choosing Medium T for axis is easy C M T for ally is easy C Heavy T for axis is still easy C H T for ally is .....Bruhhhhhhh How do you think? Roko or Monty for me... i choose simply Who is expensive? More Expensive More Greater Power So.....Monty for me Leave a message if i also in trouble Rokossovsky > Patton>Vatutin> Monty(for allies) Guderian=Rommel(for axis) Edit: Price doesnt mean power. De gaulle is extremely expensive but he is a terrible gen.(one of the worst in the game) |
|
adam31
First Lieutenant
Posts: 48
|
Post by adam31 on May 12, 2021 11:14:50 GMT
I can't agree with Heavy tank for Axis. It's not like Rommel is better there. Guderian still outperforms him on HT. The thing is - Guderian is amazing on both MT and HT, while Rommel on MT is at most mediocre. For Allies KV-6 works with Rokossovsky and Vatutin. Monty is good on Armored Car. But honestly, Manstein is much better for KV-6 as well as Boris We have no choice in Axis...there are only two great generals in axis side and we can use them alternatively..and yeah..youre right |
|
adam31
First Lieutenant
Posts: 48
|
Post by adam31 on May 12, 2021 11:16:47 GMT
Welll... We need to talk bout Tank. Medium Tank For Axis Simple....Guerdian with Panther For Ally Simple.... Patton with what u want to Heavy Tank For Axis Simple...Rommel with Maus For Ally Welll...here we go Some people said the main goal of tank is to kill Infantry so Monty is best Some people said the main goal of tank is to cover our units in fronline by defeating enemy tanks face to face so Roko is best and only KV6 is useful in Heavy Tank Special force and Roko is suitable gen to use it than Monty. Choosing Medium T for axis is easy C M T for ally is easy C Heavy T for axis is still easy C H T for ally is .....Bruhhhhhhh How do you think? Roko or Monty for me... i choose simply Who is expensive? More Expensive More Greater Power So.....Monty for me Leave a message if i also in trouble Rokossovsky > Patton>Vatutin> Monty(for allies) Guderian=Rommel(for axis) Edit: Price doesnt mean power. De gaulle is extremely expensive but he is a terrible gen.(one of the worst in the game) Except him.... i know him very well .One of the worst in game..even Belgium general i cant remember his name with each one star is better than him ..lol |
|
|
|
Post by 曹操 on May 12, 2021 12:11:22 GMT
Welll... We need to talk bout Tank. Medium Tank For Axis Simple....Guerdian with Panther For Ally Simple.... Patton with what u want to Heavy Tank For Axis Simple...Rommel with Maus For Ally Welll...here we go Some people said the main goal of tank is to kill Infantry so Monty is best Some people said the main goal of tank is to cover our units in fronline by defeating enemy tanks face to face so Roko is best and only KV6 is useful in Heavy Tank Special force and Roko is suitable gen to use it than Monty. Choosing Medium T for axis is easy C M T for ally is easy C Heavy T for axis is still easy C H T for ally is .....Bruhhhhhhh How do you think? Roko or Monty for me... i choose simply Who is expensive? More Expensive More Greater Power So.....Monty for me Leave a message if i also in trouble Rokossovsky > Patton>Vatutin> Monty(for allies) Guderian=Rommel(for axis) Edit: Price doesnt mean power. De gaulle is extremely expensive but he is a terrible gen.(one of the worst in the game) Monty is actually better than both roko and Vatutin. He is a great infantry killer thanks for his PL which always triggered compared to Rokossovsky. And His output against panzer units is only less lower than both roko and Vatutin. More over he got 50% Machinist which reduce your spend on replenishing units compared to vatutin and Roko. Also his 3 air star which sometimes will be useful. Also, do you know why my patton average output using medium tanks always similar to De gaulle average output using M Tanks |
|
|
|
Post by Joseph Stalin on May 12, 2021 12:42:36 GMT
Rokossovsky > Patton>Vatutin> Monty(for allies) Guderian=Rommel(for axis) Edit: Price doesnt mean power. De gaulle is extremely expensive but he is a terrible gen.(one of the worst in the game) Monty is actually better than both roko and Vatutin. He is a great infantry killer thanks for his PL which always triggered compared to Rokossovsky. And His output against panzer units is only less lower than both roko and Vatutin. More over he got 50% Machinist which reduce your spend on replenishing units compared to vatutin and Roko. Also his 3 air star which sometimes will be useful. Also, do you know why my patton average output using medium tanks always similar to De gaulle average output using M Tanks If you use patton to attack non SF units then yes, but you should always target SF with patton. Plus patton has a better survivability due to BK ofc. I put roko above patton cuz pattons skills are pretty bad except BK. His PL is only 12% and it almost never triggers at all. De gaules all three skils are TRASH. Roko only deals -5 less damage than monty so the Roko is an inf killer like Monty aswell. Montys ace forces is entirely useless since Heavies start with max lvl in general. Monty beats in machinist but Roko has a clear edge on anti-armor. 24% damage against armored is too much. My tech is 3-5-3-4-4 and roko helped me alot to clear campaign without buying nimitz. |
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on May 12, 2021 13:00:45 GMT
Monty is better.
|
|
|
|
Post by yuanzhong on May 12, 2021 13:16:31 GMT
Rokossovsky > Patton>Vatutin> Monty(for allies) Guderian=Rommel(for axis) Edit: Price doesnt mean power. De gaulle is extremely expensive but he is a terrible gen.(one of the worst in the game) Monty is actually better than both roko and Vatutin. He is a great infantry killer thanks for his PL which always triggered compared to Rokossovsky. And His output against panzer units is only less lower than both roko and Vatutin. More over he got 50% Machinist which reduce your spend on replenishing units compared to vatutin and Roko. Also his 3 air star which sometimes will be useful. Also, do you know why my patton average output using medium tanks always similar to De gaulle average output using M Tanks "thanks for his PL which always triggered compared to Rokossovsky" what's different between Monty's PL and Roko's one? |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 12, 2021 13:47:11 GMT
I can't agree with Heavy tank for Axis. It's not like Rommel is better there. Guderian still outperforms him on HT. The thing is - Guderian is amazing on both MT and HT, while Rommel on MT is at most mediocre. For Allies KV-6 works with Rokossovsky and Vatutin. Monty is good on Armored Car. But honestly, Manstein is much better for KV-6 as well as Boris Boreesh is best |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 12, 2021 13:54:10 GMT
So had I made a mistake by buying Roko
|
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on May 12, 2021 14:01:03 GMT
So had I made a mistake by buying Roko I would say so, as I think both Vat and Monty are better options, but not a big one by any means. Rokossovsky is an excellent general in general (see what I did there) and a tanker. He even does decent on a Katyusha versus Manstein. He has a significant plus as he can get 4 promotions. |
|
adam31
First Lieutenant
Posts: 48
|
Post by adam31 on May 12, 2021 14:29:28 GMT
So.... Who is the best Ally H T general?
|
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on May 12, 2021 14:40:46 GMT
So.... Who is the best Ally H T general? Monty. You underestimate the power of Gold Machinist. |
|
|
|
Post by idunnowhattocallthis on May 12, 2021 14:46:15 GMT
From my experience, rokossovsky does more damage consistently, For me, Montgomerys PL rarely triggers.
|
|
