|
|
Proposal
Jun 9, 2021 0:29:19 GMT
via mobile
Post by 𝘛𝘳𝘰𝘵𝘴𝘬𝘺 on Jun 9, 2021 0:29:19 GMT
A quick note: I do believe the tier three gens cost too much, and one in Particular - Cotton has 175% of the cost of Sulkowski, which seems off. I don't want you to lower the prices drastically: I honestly love the grind. But please give the IAP gens a price worth how good they are. Wow you are verry precice - yes I know, Cotton is the worst even Brock and Barclay are relative expensive. (La Salle, Murat) The Vanilla mod is intentionally made to be modded, I will adjust these prices, and correct the names for a future patch. I will tag you. |
|
|
|
Post by John Marston on Jun 9, 2021 6:48:51 GMT
Say I am doing an all IAP run with all slots and I don't want to use princesses. What should be my gen path? Should I get Kutuzov first? Because that is what I am thinking about. Why not go with the top 12 generals in Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus's all general ranking? My 12 - 1. Nelson 2. Davout 3. Lannes 4. Dombrowski (How often a Polish has got to shine?) 5. Murat 6. Suvorov 7. Washington 8. Napoleon 9. Massena (He's pretty good!) 10. Radetzky 11. Wellesely 12. Desaix (Nice hybrid) |
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Jun 9, 2021 12:06:17 GMT
Say I am doing an all IAP run with all slots and I don't want to use princesses. What should be my gen path? Should I get Kutuzov first? Because that is what I am thinking about. Why not go with the top 12 generals in Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus's all general ranking? My 12 - 1. Nelson 2. Davout 3. Lannes 4. Dombrowski (How often a Polish has got to shine?) 5. Murat 6. Suvorov 7. Washington 8. Napoleon 9. Massena (He's pretty good!) 10. Radetzky 11. Wellesely 12. Desaix (Nice hybrid) Massena? Murat? Desaix? Massena is trash, he only has leadership, Murat lacks Strike, and Desaix is literally a worse Sakurako. |
|
|
|
Post by John Marston on Jun 9, 2021 12:10:10 GMT
Why not go with the top 12 generals in Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus 's all general ranking? My 12 - 1. Nelson 2. Davout 3. Lannes 4. Dombrowski (How often a Polish has got to shine?) 5. Murat 6. Suvorov 7. Washington 8. Napoleon 9. Massena (He's pretty good!) 10. Radetzky 11. Wellesely 12. Desaix (Nice hybrid) Massena? Murat? Desaix? Massena is trash, he only has leadership, Murat lacks Strike, and Desaix is literally a worse Sakurako. Murat lacks strike, but name someone better than him, in the IAP, except Dombrowski and Radetzky Massena has leadership and Surprise which are great and make him a good Cavalry general. Desaix has normal, but consistence damage, but the flipside is his low survivability. |
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Jun 9, 2021 12:14:07 GMT
Massena? Murat? Desaix? Massena is trash, he only has leadership, Murat lacks Strike, and Desaix is literally a worse Sakurako. Murat lacks strike, but name someone better than him, in the IAP, except Dombrowski and Radetzky Massena has leadership and Surprise which are great and make him a good Cavalry general. Desaix has normal, but consistence damage, but the flipside is his low survivability. 1. Paget. 2. A two skill general is not a good one in my book. 3. Sakurako is easy to get. |
|
|
|
Post by John Marston on Jun 9, 2021 12:17:17 GMT
Murat lacks strike, but name someone better than him, in the IAP, except Dombrowski and Radetzky Massena has leadership and Surprise which are great and make him a good Cavalry general. Desaix has normal, but consistence damage, but the flipside is his low survivability. 1. Paget. 2. A two skill general is not a good one in my book. 3. Sakurako is easy to get. 1. Mobility - Useless b. Economic expert - mostly useless c. Strike - Good (But only 2-3 damage increase) d. Assault art - Triggers by chance so good. e. Low survivability. 2. Agreed. 3. But this is about the IAPs |
|
|
|
Proposal
Jun 9, 2021 12:25:09 GMT
via mobile
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Jun 9, 2021 12:25:09 GMT
1. Paget. 2. A two skill general is not a good one in my book. 3. Sakurako is easy to get. 1. Mobility - Useless b. Economic expert - mostly useless c. Strike - Good (But only 2-3 damage increase) d. Assault art - Triggers by chance so good. e. Low survivability. 2. Agreed. 3. But this is about the IAPs 1: Economic Expert us Useful on everyone. That's why all of my (two) gens on my first playthrough until I found this mod had an economic Item, Ney and Berthier. 2. Great 3. We are talking about everything, just including IAPs, or so I thought. |
|
|
|
Post by John Marston on Jun 9, 2021 12:27:08 GMT
1. Mobility - Useless b. Economic expert - mostly useless c. Strike - Good (But only 2-3 damage increase) d. Assault art - Triggers by chance so good. e. Low survivability. 2. Agreed. 3. But this is about the IAPs 1: Economic Expert us Useful on everyone. That's why all of my (two) gens on my first playthrough until I found this mod had an economic Item, Ney and Berthier. But you don't want to put your expert combat generals in the cities. Someone like Arnold can do that much better. Even if the generals conquer a lot of cities, the output would still be very less as they have to move on after conquering a city. |
|
|
|
Proposal
Jun 9, 2021 12:28:40 GMT
via mobile
Post by 𝘛𝘳𝘰𝘵𝘴𝘬𝘺 on Jun 9, 2021 12:28:40 GMT
1. Paget. 2. A two skill general is not a good one in my book. 3. Sakurako is easy to get. 1. Mobility - Useless b. Economic expert - mostly useless c. Strike - Good (But only 2-3 damage increase) d. Assault art - Triggers by chance so good. e. Low survivability. 2. Agreed.8surprise 3. But this is about the IAPs Just two things: Strike removes evasion - even hidden evasion. this is the most valuable skill for cavallary! The max-dmg +1 (surprise) give only 2.5 - 3.5 more dmg |
|
|
|
Proposal
Jun 9, 2021 12:28:59 GMT
via mobile
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Jun 9, 2021 12:28:59 GMT
1: Economic Expert us Useful on everyone. That's why all of my (two) gens on my first playthrough until I found this mod had an economic Item, Ney and Berthier. But you don't want to put your expert combat generals in the cities. Someone like Arnold can do that much better. Even if the generals conquer a lot of cities, the output would still be very less as they have to move on after conquering a city. When they are not in cities, they are in farms. And I brace my cities (with gens inside) for the spam that cometh forth. |
|
|
|
Post by John Marston on Jun 9, 2021 12:30:23 GMT
1. Mobility - Useless b. Economic expert - mostly useless c. Strike - Good (But only 2-3 damage increase) d. Assault art - Triggers by chance so good. e. Low survivability. 2. Agreed.8surprise 3. But this is about the IAPs Just two things: Strike removes evasion - even hidden evasion. this is the most valuable skill for cavallary! The max-dmg +1 (surprise) give only 2.5 - 3.5 more dmg I didn't know 1. But is 2.5 counted as 3 and 3.5 as 4? |
|
|
|
Post by John Marston on Jun 9, 2021 12:33:22 GMT
But you don't want to put your expert combat generals in the cities. Someone like Arnold can do that much better. Even if the generals conquer a lot of cities, the output would still be very less as they have to move on after conquering a city. When they are not in cities, they are in farms. And I brace my cities (with gens inside) for the spam that cometh forth. You can upgrade farms easily. There are two scenarios - 1. In campaign. If you put your general on farm, it's worse than putting in cities. He's just standing there for nothing because food supply would usually be equal to or above the consumption. 2. In conquests, there are many farms to do that work. And also, the situations are rare (unless you're losing) where you general must sit in the city and prevent it's siege. |
|
|
|
Proposal
Jun 9, 2021 12:41:27 GMT
via mobile
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Jun 9, 2021 12:41:27 GMT
When they are not in cities, they are in farms. And I brace my cities (with gens inside) for the spam that cometh forth. You can upgrade farms easily. There are two scenarios - 1. In campaign. If you put your general on farm, it's worse than putting in cities. He's just standing there for nothing because food supply would usually be equal to or above the consumption. 2. In conquests, there are many farms to do that work. And also, the situations are rare (unless you're losing) where you general must sit in the city and prevent it's siege. Yes, but a nice bonus isn't nothing when they would be in the area anyway, right? |
|
|
|
Post by John Marston on Jun 9, 2021 12:52:18 GMT
You can upgrade farms easily. There are two scenarios - 1. In campaign. If you put your general on farm, it's worse than putting in cities. He's just standing there for nothing because food supply would usually be equal to or above the consumption. 2. In conquests, there are many farms to do that work. And also, the situations are rare (unless you're losing) where you general must sit in the city and prevent it's siege. Yes, but a nice bonus isn't nothing when they would be in the area anyway, right? That is true, but my point is that there are better options |
|
|
|
Proposal
Jun 9, 2021 12:56:17 GMT
via mobile
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Jun 9, 2021 12:56:17 GMT
Just two things: Strike removes evasion - even hidden evasion. this is the most valuable skill for cavallary! The max-dmg +1 (surprise) give only 2.5 - 3.5 more dmg I didn't know 1. But is 2.5 counted as 3 and 3.5 as 4? No, everything, even if it was 3.999, is rounded down. |
|
