|
|
Post by John Marston on Jun 9, 2021 15:07:33 GMT
I didn't know 1. But is 2.5 counted as 3 and 3.5 as 4? No, everything, even if it was 3.999, is rounded down. So that means... 3.5 is rounded as 4? |
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Jun 9, 2021 15:24:22 GMT
No, everything, even if it was 3.999, is rounded down. So that means... 3.5 is rounded as 4? 3.5 is 3. |
|
|
|
Proposal
Jun 9, 2021 16:41:38 GMT
via mobile
ks likes this
Post by ππ³π°π΅π΄π¬πΊ on Jun 9, 2021 16:41:38 GMT
So that means... 3.5 is rounded as 4? 3.5 is 3. Sorry for the confusion I cause. Precise: The max-dmg +1 skills raise the maximum_dammage by 1* HealthFactor. The random unit dammage will be between [ 1 - maximum_dmg ] So the max+1 skills raise on average the output for Β½*HealthFactor. It is not rounded, it is a statistical value. That the lower range of the random part is 1, and not ( min-dmg * HealthFactor ) is the EW4-minBug. |
|
|
|
Post by Arya Stark on Jun 9, 2021 18:04:07 GMT
Say I am doing an all IAP run with all slots and I don't want to use princesses. What should be my gen path? Should I get Kutuzov first? Because that is what I am thinking about. IMO, a full IAP path could look something like this: Cotton/Murat, then buy an arty gen (due to better output), either Nelson or Moreau. Then get a second cav commander, can be either Murat/Cotton (whichever one you didn't buy), Dombrowski, Radetsky, or even Davout. Then a navy gen (Nelson or Treville), a second arty gen, a third cav gen and then maybe an inf gen assuming you have extra slots. Get Lannes or Suvurov if thats the case, |
|
|
|
Post by Arya Stark on Jun 9, 2021 18:07:51 GMT
Why not go with the top 12 generals in Friedrich βFried Riceβ Paulus 's all general ranking? My 12 - 1. Nelson 2. Davout 3. Lannes 4. Dombrowski (How often a Polish has got to shine?) 5. Murat 6. Suvorov 7. Washington 8. Napoleon 9. Massena (He's pretty good!) 10. Radetzky 11. Wellesely 12. Desaix (Nice hybrid) Massena? Murat? Desaix? Massena is trash, he only has leadership, Murat lacks Strike, and Desaix is literally a worse Sakurako. Murat is one of the better fort killers in the game especially when he decides to activate Assault Art. Desaix is Sakurako with war master and needs similar investment to be viable. He's just bad because he costs 6 emblems |
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Jun 9, 2021 18:22:22 GMT
Massena? Murat? Desaix? Massena is trash, he only has leadership, Murat lacks Strike, and Desaix is literally a worse Sakurako. Murat is one of the better fort killers in the game especially when he decides to activate Assault Art. Desaix is Sakurako with war master and needs similar investment to be viable. He's just bad because he costs 6 emblems I would prefer Cotton to Murat, at least he has Strike, and even sailor is forgivable because of that. Heck, I would want regrouped Sulkowski over Murat purely because of Murat's lack of Strike. |
|
|
|
Post by littlecorporal on Jun 9, 2021 19:07:48 GMT
We should just consider the generals with strike, accuracy, bugle in their respective specialties right? What about Poniatowski? Only general with all universal skills.
So many IAPs have banner!
|
|
|
|
Post by Arya Stark on Jun 9, 2021 19:10:57 GMT
We should just consider the generals with strike, accuracy, bugle in their respective specialties right? What about Poniatowski? Only general with all universal skills. So many IAPs have banner! Nelson has banner and he's one of the best IAPs out there. Lol. Deciding which commanders are the best can be hard |
|
|
|
Proposal
Jun 9, 2021 19:42:09 GMT
via mobile
Post by ππ³π°π΅π΄π¬πΊ on Jun 9, 2021 19:42:09 GMT
Murat is one of the better fort killers in the game especially when he decides to activate Assault Art. Desaix is Sakurako with war master and needs similar investment to be viable. He's just bad because he costs 6 emblems I would prefer Cotton to Murat, at least he has Strike, and even sailor is forgivable because of that. Heck, I would want regrouped Sulkowski over Murat purely because of Murat's lack of Strike. I absolutely agree. If I can have tier III, Cotton will be for sure in my lineup. Sailor is for me, one of the best additional skills for cavalary. And he even has SPY. One hand for the snair and one pistol and every landing operation is an easy going: Cotton is the best costal fort cracker in game: Having a pistol instead the carrier, on guards, he gets 58 DMG flat on top! of the unit, he can't fail - and can continue his attack! P.S. Costal forts have an advantage against ships - Imo not against troops on sea. |
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Jun 9, 2021 20:02:27 GMT
I would prefer Cotton to Murat, at least he has Strike, and even sailor is forgivable because of that. Heck, I would want regrouped Sulkowski over Murat purely because of Murat's lack of Strike. I absolutely agree. If I can have tier III, Cotton will be for sure in my lineup. Sailor is for me, one of the best additional skills for cavalary. And he even has SPY. One hand for the snair and one pistol and every landing operation is an easy going: Cotton is the best costal fort cracker in game: Having a pistol instead the carrier, on guards, he gets 58 DMG flat on top! of the unit, he can't fail - and can continue his attack! P.S. Costal forts have an advantage against ships - Imo not against troops on sea. Exactly, Coastal Forts don't do extra damage to Transports. IMO, he is the second best cav, after, you guessed it, Paget. |
|
|
|
Post by John Marston on Jun 10, 2021 2:23:27 GMT
I absolutely agree. If I can have tier III, Cotton will be for sure in my lineup. Sailor is for me, one of the best additional skills for cavalary. And he even has SPY. One hand for the snair and one pistol and every landing operation is an easy going: Cotton is the best costal fort cracker in game: Having a pistol instead the carrier, on guards, he gets 58 DMG flat on top! of the unit, he can't fail - and can continue his attack! P.S. Costal forts have an advantage against ships - Imo not against troops on sea. Exactly, Coastal Forts don't do extra damage to Transports. IMO, he is the second best cav, after, you guessed it, Paget. I'd say the best is Dombrowski. |
|
|
|
Post by littlecorporal on Jun 15, 2021 15:17:50 GMT
I have been thinking about some of the ideas in this thread. Here's what I0 think:
The Princesses are the best generals in the game and the key to getting all the items.
Using generals during the campaign uses up valuable medals for marginal improvement.
Once you have most items, almost every general is strong, even Maria with snare and war horse is good.
Once you have completed the campaign with Princesses, you can explore the game with historically accurate generals. You no longer need medals, You have most items.
The traditional way of using generals to get Princesses is the reverse. You can use Princesses to get generals.
|
|
