|
Post by Voltaire on Aug 3, 2021 4:35:15 GMT
He is under the other category. I personally don't feel he is comparable to the others on his list, as even other romans like Caesar, Scipio Africanius, and Pompey are comparable My man literally wages guerilla warfare against the most powerful nation of the world, with ill-trained, ill-equipped, ill-led men, and manages to last. It takes more skill to launch pitched battles than guerilla warfare. Especially in an outstretched province. The romans had to send troops all the way to Spain, that greatly decreases the effectiveness of the army as they are far from home.
|
|
|
Post by zink on Aug 11, 2021 23:37:58 GMT
Still saying Khalid ibn al-Walid
Jan Zizka and Yi Sun-sin were cool
|
|
|
Post by Captain on Aug 24, 2021 16:08:58 GMT
It's better to see the majority votes for Napoleon Bonaparte ๐๐
|
|
|
Post by alexandrvasilevski on Oct 1, 2021 3:38:28 GMT
The only disadvantage of Suvorov was that he wasnโt a ruler. Truly unbeatable general with no defeats at all (while even Napoleon suffered many of them)
|
|
|
Post by STILETT0 on Oct 5, 2021 8:43:55 GMT
Who is the Greatest General of all time the insurance company that makes commercials with Snoop Dogg.
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Oct 5, 2021 12:34:49 GMT
Seriously, though, JJ Seziure. No contest except for Napoleon.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 21, 2021 11:52:54 GMT
me voting for the korean yi sun shin, best navy hero general ever. beating with turtle ships millions of japanese during their invasion in the seven years war
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 26, 2021 6:56:30 GMT
Depends on the criteria. Napoleon was in war a lot, so he had time to rack up his wins. Winning isn't the only thing to consider, but also defeat. For instance, Caesar in the civil war was evenly matched with Pompey, and though he lost( his army could have been destroyed had Pompey ordered to pursue them), he managed to bounce back and defeated Pompei in the decisive battle of Pharsalus. Another thing to consider is the opposition. How strong was the opposition? And finally, other outside factors, such as other brilliant generals, army formation, etc. Napoleon is attributed to a lot of victories, but if we look at those battles, majority of those victories are due to his great marshals. Although, he deserves most credit due to him reforming the army, which led yo the discovery of these great marshals. A great general is great in both strategy and tactics, ability to adapt, able to bounce back after defeat, and adapt an effective chain of command that won't rely too much on the general. In this case, i would vote for Julius Caesar, but the options are undoubtedly all great generals. There are also lesser known generals like Sertorius and Philip II of Macedon,and lesser known generals than them, so it'd be hard to objectively pinpoint who the best is.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 26, 2021 15:25:55 GMT
Not sure if overrated is the right word. The Grande Armรฉe was pretty much the most powerful military force from 1804 to 1809, and thanks to Napoleons reform, allowed him to defeat their enemies, and thanks to his brilliant strategic and tactical mind,managed orchestrate brilliant victories like the battle of Ulm and Austerlitz. His downfall is pretty much him not being the best politician and statesman. He valued nepotism too much rather than extending his meritocratic reward system from his military reform to his governance. He also put too much emphasis in conquering than on governing, and using military force rather than shrewd diplomacy that would satisfy his allies. He also started to rely more on sheer numbers and weapons as he got older rather than brilliant tactics, which can be observed during his Russian campaign. But overall, in war, i think he deserves the title bestowed on him by Clausewitz: god of war. But outside war, he definitely should have learned more from Caesar. Then again, Caesar made the blunder of appearing and acting too kinglike. I guess the lesson is to learn from history and to not repeat their mistakes.
|
|
|
Post by blueberry on Nov 26, 2021 16:43:47 GMT
I guess the lesson is to learn from history and to not repeat their mistakes. LOL, are you planning to conquer the world?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 26, 2021 17:04:21 GMT
I guess the lesson is to learn from history and to not repeat their mistakes. LOL, are you planning to conquer the world? If i was born centuries earlier then maybe. Still, you can still apply them in daily life.
|
|
|
Post by blueberry on Nov 26, 2021 17:43:28 GMT
If i was born centuries earlier then maybe. Still, you can still apply them in daily life.ย Ah,ok. After all, it's a matter of avoiding hybris, as the ancient Greeks taught
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 1, 2021 18:12:20 GMT
definately Alexander the great, followed up by Ghengis khan Napoleon being ranking third, fourth caesar, fifth Nelson/Yisunshin
|
|
|
Post by ๆนๆ on Dec 9, 2021 11:25:27 GMT
If We talk Aboutย Generalsย The Only one here is Napoleon. I am an Emperor Well well i'm from the future and I say no you got demoted into general
|
|
|
Post by alexandrvasilevski on Dec 11, 2021 5:19:53 GMT
Napoleon Blownapart
|
|