|
|
Post by 曹操 on Sept 21, 2021 1:44:17 GMT
Where are we supposed to move? Into the Himalayas? I think it's just too cool for surviving there  It is much easier than moving into space. Antarctica can become fertile land with some terraforming. Uhmm.. himalayan lacks of Oxygen and second Building house on Mountain is not a good idea due to vulnerability of Landslide. Terraforming Antartica is also bad idea. Because you'll need the whole Ice melted which by the time it happen most of Earth will be drowned. Moving to Space is better not only it provided New Home to Human but also prevent our species to Extinct. |
|
|
|
Post by Kliment Jefremovitš Vorošilov on Sept 21, 2021 5:09:39 GMT
It is much easier than moving into space. Antarctica can become fertile land with some terraforming. Uhmm.. himalayan lacks of Oxygen and second Building house on Mountain is not a good idea due to vulnerability of Landslide. Terraforming Antartica is also bad idea. Because you'll need the whole Ice melted which by the time it happen most of Earth will be drowned. Moving to Space is better not only it provided New Home to Human but also prevent our species to Extinct. Why would you move to space to live in a cylinder, when you can live in a cylinder here on earth? |
|
|
|
Post by 曹操 on Sept 21, 2021 6:45:04 GMT
Why would you move to space to live in a cylinder, when you can live in a cylinder here on earth? Do you mean cylinder under the sea or something? If yes then we will ruin the Ecosystem at Sea. And We will make the sea dirty. If no and you mean still live up at Land, well first polution and Trash problem. We probably will make the environment in a worsening condition. And Yes human population will still boom. We need land to grow Food. So if we move human to other planet not only our species will be varied, but we will be able to move them and use their former land to grow food therefore we can support human in thousand of years. Also Do you know that Sun will eventually destroy Earth? When it unable to contain it's masses it will grow bigger and bigger then boom. Earth may disappear and The sun will be weaker. Except if we know to prevent it |
|
|
|
Post by Inactive user on Sept 21, 2021 6:52:51 GMT
Why would you move to space to live in a cylinder, when you can live in a cylinder here on earth? Do you mean cylinder under the sea or something? If yes then we will ruin the Ecosystem at Sea. And We will make the sea dirty. If no and you mean still live up at Land, well first polution and Trash problem. We probably will make the environment in a worsening condition. And Yes human population will still boom. We need land to grow Food. So if we move human to other planet not only our species will be varied, but we will be able to move them and use their former land to grow food therefore we can support human in thousand of years. Also Do you know that Sun will eventually destroy Earth? When it unable to contain it's masses it will grow bigger and bigger then boom. Earth may disappear and The sun will be weaker. Except if we know to prevent it Problem is we can't prevent it... "Neko" |
|
|
|
Post by Kliment Jefremovitš Vorošilov on Sept 21, 2021 8:18:09 GMT
Why would you move to space to live in a cylinder, when you can live in a cylinder here on earth? Do you mean cylinder under the sea or something? If yes then we will ruin the Ecosystem at Sea. And We will make the sea dirty. If no and you mean still live up at Land, well first polution and Trash problem. We probably will make the environment in a worsening condition. And Yes human population will still boom. We need land to grow Food. So if we move human to other planet not only our species will be varied, but we will be able to move them and use their former land to grow food therefore we can support human in thousand of years. Also Do you know that Sun will eventually destroy Earth? When it unable to contain it's masses it will grow bigger and bigger then boom. Earth may disappear and The sun will be weaker. Except if we know to prevent it Yes, I am aware of Sun destroying earth and I am aware of photosynthesis and evolution. Firstly scientists expect the human population to decline in the following 100 years. Secondly you talk about problems like pollution and trash. But we can't just hop around in Mars either, we would need to live in airsealed cylinders. So why would we live in airsealed cylinders in Mars when we can live in airsealed cylinders on earth. But I do think Earth and it's buodiversity shouldn't be destroyed. And are you aware that it will take many billion years for the Sun to destroy Earth. |
|
|
|
Post by Kliment Jefremovitš Vorošilov on Sept 21, 2021 8:18:37 GMT
Do you mean cylinder under the sea or something? If yes then we will ruin the Ecosystem at Sea. And We will make the sea dirty. If no and you mean still live up at Land, well first polution and Trash problem. We probably will make the environment in a worsening condition. And Yes human population will still boom. We need land to grow Food. So if we move human to other planet not only our species will be varied, but we will be able to move them and use their former land to grow food therefore we can support human in thousand of years. Also Do you know that Sun will eventually destroy Earth? When it unable to contain it's masses it will grow bigger and bigger then boom. Earth may disappear and The sun will be weaker. Except if we know to prevent it Problem is we can't prevent it... "Neko" Yeah, hiw would we prevent it? |
|
|
|
Post by 曹操 on Sept 21, 2021 8:39:26 GMT
Problem is we can't prevent it... "Neko" Yeah, hiw would we prevent it? Yeah i know it will happen but i forgot million or Billion. To prevent idk too, but basically the Core of the sun unable to maintain the whole Sun mass so eventually it will collapse under it's own mass and explode into bigger size until eventually become smaller. So maybe reducing it's mass by Pulling it's Mass as Energy to Earth? |
|
|
|
Post by 𝘛𝘳𝘰𝘵𝘴𝘬𝘺 on Sept 21, 2021 23:56:49 GMT
Hmmm the sun will start to make problems in a few tousand of million years. Any thinking or planning about this today is ... irrelevant. Colonizing other planets will be something for maximal a few thousand people not more - and this will completly ruin the earth. To say there 99% of humans too much is much healthier than a solution for just a few thousands, and where they wanna go? Regardless what happens to earth, earth will be for the next 1000 years the best place to live in our solar system - even after WWLX. Everything outside is unreachable, even in an extended lifetime. Just traveling without ever arriving somewhere in a spaceship  - Living in a tin (cylinder) on earth is the better idea. I think the argument Kliment Jefremovitš Vorošilov is really sharp. I believe, if humans make it a few 100 years more, maybe the grandchildren of our robots will colonize other planets. A gentetical follower of humans today, will never have the necessary capabilities for that. |
|
|
|
Post by John Marston on Sept 22, 2021 15:26:42 GMT
Why would you move to space to live in a cylinder, when you can live in a cylinder here on earth? Do you mean cylinder under the sea or something? If yes then we will ruin the Ecosystem at Sea. And We will make the sea dirty. If no and you mean still live up at Land, well first polution and Trash problem. We probably will make the environment in a worsening condition. And Yes human population will still boom. We need land to grow Food. So if we move human to other planet not only our species will be varied, but we will be able to move them and use their former land to grow food therefore we can support human in thousand of years. Also Do you know that Sun will eventually destroy Earth? When it unable to contain it's masses it will grow bigger and bigger then boom. Earth may disappear and The sun will be weaker. Except if we know to prevent it Not Really. 1. Pollution and trash will be eventually wiped out from earth. We just need better tech/materials/disposing techniques or whatever. 2. Look at the stats about the population of the next century and you will observe a population bust. Add that to colonizing the Space and setteling on new planets, there will for sure be no population boom. In fact, there is a book where the author predicted wars, where one of the reason was population bust. 3. We do have a lot of land to grow food. It's just that plants can't survive there. Maybe some genetic changes would do the trick? CRISPR looks promising. 4. Hahaha! Even if a group of humans are cut off for tens of thousands of years, even though our species will vary by 0.1%. 5. Have faith in technology and human brain. I always believe that the limits of technology are just your imagination. Everything is/will be possible. Who knows, maybe one day in the next 5 billion years, we might find a way to prevent the Sun from aging. |
|
|
|
Post by 曹操 on Sept 22, 2021 23:42:19 GMT
1. Pollution and trash will be eventually wiped out from earth. We just need better tech/materials/disposing techniques or whatever. 2. Look at the stats about the population of the next century and you will observe a population bust. Add that to colonizing the Space and setteling on new planets, there will for sure be no population boom. In fact, there is a book where the author predicted wars, where one of the reason was population bust. 3. We do have a lot of land to grow food. It's just that plants can't survive there. Maybe some genetic changes would do the trick? CRISPR looks promising. 4. Hahaha! Even if a group of humans are cut off for tens of thousands of years, even though our species will vary by 0.1%. 5. Have faith in technology and human brain. I always believe that the limits of technology are just your imagination. Everything is/will be possible. Who knows, maybe one day in the next 5 billion years, we might find a way to prevent the Sun from aging. 1. Well yeah but since you know those tech were expensive usually people just like meh just use the cheapest alternative *proceed to send pollution in high number to air. 2. Well but rn it still growing. Besides Having another home planet is fun too 3. Hmm well genetic engineering might be good but usually new Illness might appear. 4. Well usually species become vary based on Environment 5. Hope so |
|
|
|
Post by Kliment Jefremovitš Vorošilov on Sept 23, 2021 4:47:39 GMT
1. Pollution and trash will be eventually wiped out from earth. We just need better tech/materials/disposing techniques or whatever. 2. Look at the stats about the population of the next century and you will observe a population bust. Add that to colonizing the Space and setteling on new planets, there will for sure be no population boom. In fact, there is a book where the author predicted wars, where one of the reason was population bust. 3. We do have a lot of land to grow food. It's just that plants can't survive there. Maybe some genetic changes would do the trick? CRISPR looks promising. 4. Hahaha! Even if a group of humans are cut off for tens of thousands of years, even though our species will vary by 0.1%. 5. Have faith in technology and human brain. I always believe that the limits of technology are just your imagination. Everything is/will be possible. Who knows, maybe one day in the next 5 billion years, we might find a way to prevent the Sun from aging. 1. Well yeah but since you know those tech were expensive usually people just like meh just use the cheapest alternative *proceed to send pollution in high number to air. 2. Well but rn it still growing. Besides Having another home planet is fun too 3. Hmm well genetic engineering might be good but usually new Illness might appear. 4. Well usually species become vary based on Environment 5. Hope so Species do vary, but extremely slowly. |
|
|
|
Post by John Marston on Sept 24, 2021 16:04:33 GMT
1. Well yeah but since you know those tech were expensive usually people just like meh just use the cheapest alternative *proceed to send pollution in high number to air. 2. Well but rn it still growing. Besides Having another home planet is fun too 3. Hmm well genetic engineering might be good but usually new Illness might appear. 4. Well usually species become vary based on Environment 5. Hope so Species do vary, but extremely slowly. Varying here is a different term (Basically adaptation). For example, the tribes living in high altitude have larger lungs to breathe more oxygen (as O2 becomes scarce as we go up), those in desert areas are adapted to live with lot of heat, humidity and less water. The gap between these "Regional" differences becomes even more visible when we settle in multiple planets. For example, a person living on moon is weaker than that on Earth because the gravity of earth is more and to do everything, you need to do more (Using the scientific notation) Work. |
|
|
|
Post by Kliment Jefremovitš Vorošilov on Sept 24, 2021 16:59:15 GMT
Species do vary, but extremely slowly. Varying here is a different term (Basically adaptation). For example, the tribes living in high altitude have larger lungs to breathe more oxygen (as O2 becomes scarce as we go up), those in desert areas are adapted to live with lot of heat, humidity and less water. The gap between these "Regional" differences becomes even more visible when we settle in multiple planets. For example, a person living on moon is weaker than that on Earth because the gravity of earth is more and to do everything, you need to do more (Using the scientific notation) Work. Also adaptation depends on the change of enviroment so humans would pro adapt significantly faster on other planets than here. |
|
- Living in a tin (cylinder) on earth is the better idea. I think the argument 
