|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 7, 2021 12:03:51 GMT
Captain , hmmmm, can you make another guide, but this time a review for the best early game generals. Doesn't have to be long, a short review will suffice. I'll personally review them. Medal to general effectiveness is one criteria you can consider. If it's precise and good enough, then I'll add you. Ok, you are saying to use generals in guides(I previously made those 11 guides without any generals and got a point of 8or9/10 for each guides by John Marston ) It's a general review, specifically cheap generals that can be bought early. And among those generals, pick the best and explain why. |
|
|
|
New group
Nov 7, 2021 12:08:47 GMT
via mobile
Post by Captain on Nov 7, 2021 12:08:47 GMT
Ok, you are saying to use generals in guides(I previously made those 11 guides without any generals and got a point of 8or9/10 for each guides by John Marston ) It's a general review, specifically cheap generals that can be bought early. And among those generals, pick the best and explain why.ย Sure, with your active supports I will obviously complete that๐ |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 7, 2021 12:17:17 GMT
It's a general review, specifically cheap generals that can be bought early. And among those generals, pick the best and explain why. Sure, with your active supports I will obviously complete that๐ Of course you can  |
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Nov 8, 2021 18:36:43 GMT
I actually just remembered that. I think I'll just review that and give my thoughts on them. GCR doesn't need much guide update for now I think. I'll review them later on. EW6 1914 has a problem with guides, so I'll put most of my effort there. I have to stop brainstorming ways and test GCR conquests atm. Doesn't help my device is having battery issues and the my new replacement device has been delayed thanks to covid. Yeah, Imma delete that thread, I just don't have the time anymore to work on it at all. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 8, 2021 22:58:04 GMT
I actually just remembered that. I think I'll just review that and give my thoughts on them. GCR doesn't need much guide update for now I think. I'll review them later on. EW6 1914 has a problem with guides, so I'll put most of my effort there. I have to stop brainstorming ways and test GCR conquests atm. Doesn't help my device is having battery issues and the my new replacement device has been delayed thanks to covid. Yeah, Imma delete that thread, I just don't have the time anymore to work on it at all. You don't have to delete it really. I can edit it for you if you want. |
|
|
|
New group
Nov 14, 2021 6:54:16 GMT
via mobile
Post by Captain on Nov 14, 2021 6:54:16 GMT
european-war-4.boards.net/thread/16331/wcq4-scenarios-europe-beginnersI'm sorry if it was not visible but it was a similar page on guides And it was reviewed by chestnut also Currently I am trying to carve my name for WORLD FASTEST CONQUEROR (which is ultra max. hard cause I am very late to find it), that'swhy I'm very busy nowdays Edit: why it's not visible, (actually I use mobile therefore it's one problem thoo) anyway we have to solve the issue, to help the beginners For worlds fastest conqueror title, I don't think wc4 is the best game for that. Pretty sure the records there are highly optimized now. But then again, beating or having a tie with a current record could just short cut you to getting the title. Good luck with your runs, you're going to need them  .ย Did you know, yesterday I recorded the least no. of cities captured (that's 0) in 1939 as France in wcq4 conquest. My name is also posted in the record list, edited by nobanuga. But still didn't get into the group 'WORLD'S FASTEST CONQUEROR'. Can you suggest me what shall I do now to draw their attention over me, please๐ฅบ |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 14, 2021 7:22:00 GMT
For worlds fastest conqueror title, I don't think wc4 is the best game for that. Pretty sure the records there are highly optimized now. But then again, beating or having a tie with a current record could just short cut you to getting the title. Good luck with your runs, you're going to need them . Did you know, yesterday I recorded the least no. of cities captured (that's 0) in 1939 as France in wcq4 conquest. My name is also posted in the record list, edited by nobanuga. But still didn't get into the group 'WORLD'S FASTEST CONQUEROR'. Can you suggest me what shall I do now to draw their attention over me, please๐ฅบ World's fastest conqueror title is only given if you beat a low turn count record, incorrectly termed as a speedrun record, but it doesn't really matter what it's called and i'm just being pedantic. If you can beat a record in, for example, fastest 3 star nation, then members do a vote who if you get it. Currently, we decided to be more strict for newer or newish records, as they're easier to beat so they're not that challenging. So the best way to get in is to either beat multiple ones, or beat 1 really hard to beat record. You can also tie a record, provided it's a hard record to tie. If i would give you a suggestion, the fastest record for 1861 EW6 1914 is something that you could consider to tie, if you play EW6 1914(it's a record i set so i know how hard it was to get it). Not sure about WC4, ask George Rudi about which records you can try beating or getting a tie. |
|
|
|
Post by George Rudi on Nov 14, 2021 11:48:36 GMT
Did you know, yesterday I recorded the least no. of cities captured (that's 0) in 1939 as France in wcq4 conquest. My name is also posted in the record list, edited by nobanuga. But still didn't get into the group 'WORLD'S FASTEST CONQUEROR'. Can you suggest me what shall I do now to draw their attention over me, please๐ฅบ World's fastest conqueror title is only given if you beat a low turn count record, incorrectly termed as a speedrun record, but it doesn't really matter what it's called and i'm just being pedantic. If you can beat a record in, for example, fastest 3 star nation, then members do a vote who if you get it. Currently, we decided to be more strict for newer or newish records, as they're easier to beat so they're not that challenging. So the best way to get in is to either beat multiple ones, or beat 1 really hard to beat record. You can also tie a record, provided it's a hard record to tie. If i would give you a suggestion, the fastest record for 1861 EW6 1914 is something that you could consider to tie, if you play EW6 1914(it's a record i set so i know how hard it was to get it). Not sure about WC4, ask George Rudi about which records you can try beating or getting a tie. well i dont know about the exact numbers of record you should beat to be included, but let me tell you how i can get that title from WC4. At first i trie to beat some of most and least city conquered, since i didn't have maxed out my gens. When i got some experience on conquest, i tried to beat some speed related record without a gen (that's easier to achieve because you only need max tech). After that, i tried one star and 3 stars conquest record, some record still being held by me, and some more was broken back by Journeykeen as the older record holder. Then i write to Saltin to be included in that group. After several days, i'm being included in that group after some vote from other members (to decide if they have any objection or not). My suggestion is try to challenge some of my speed related conquest record, then aim for Journeykeen's record (since his records are really harder to beat). If you succeed, i'll let the other member know your achievement. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 14, 2021 12:05:29 GMT
World's fastest conqueror title is only given if you beat a low turn count record, incorrectly termed as a speedrun record, but it doesn't really matter what it's called and i'm just being pedantic. If you can beat a record in, for example, fastest 3 star nation, then members do a vote who if you get it. Currently, we decided to be more strict for newer or newish records, as they're easier to beat so they're not that challenging. So the best way to get in is to either beat multiple ones, or beat 1 really hard to beat record. You can also tie a record, provided it's a hard record to tie. If i would give you a suggestion, the fastest record for 1861 EW6 1914 is something that you could consider to tie, if you play EW6 1914(it's a record i set so i know how hard it was to get it). Not sure about WC4, ask George Rudi about which records you can try beating or getting a tie. well i dont know about the exact numbers of record you should beat to be included, but let me tell you how i can get that title from WC4. At first i trie to beat some of most and least city conquered, since i didn't have maxed out my gens. When i got some experience on conquest, i tried to beat some speed related record without a gen (that's easier to achieve because you only need max tech). After that, i tried one star and 3 stars conquest record, some record still being held by me, and some more was broken back by Journeykeen as the older record holder. Then i write to Saltin to be included in that group. After several days, i'm being included in that group after some vote from other members (to decide if they have any objection or not). My suggestion is try to challenge some of my speed related conquest record, then aim for Journeykeen's record (since his records are really harder to beat). If you succeed, i'll let the other member know your achievement. Sure, i'll try to beat some of the records and admit myself to the group once again . But yes, the WC4 records is quite optimized. Eventually, a tie is the only thing you can do. Haven't played WC4 to know which is which. I'll just tag Captain, since your message seems to be for him. |
|
|
|
Post by Captain on Nov 14, 2021 12:13:56 GMT
Thanks George Rudi & DeletedWhat you all said is not less than a guide Bless me if I can really beat a current record |
|
|
|
Post by George Rudi on Nov 14, 2021 13:11:59 GMT
Thanks George Rudi & DeletedWhat you all said is not less than a guide Bless me if I can really beat a current record good luck for both of you then, it's nice to see other member try to challenge what you already achieved |
|
|
|
New group
Dec 4, 2021 15:18:07 GMT
via mobile
Post by Captain on Dec 4, 2021 15:18:07 GMT
DeletedCan you join me to this group? I aslo passed the qualifications
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 5, 2021 0:33:58 GMT
Deleted Can you join me to this group? I aslo passed the qualifications Tag me some of your guides so i can see them. |
|
|
|
Post by Captain on Dec 5, 2021 2:41:47 GMT
Deleted Can you join me to this group? I aslo passed the qualifications Tag me some of your guides so i can see them. I tagged you in one of the mid posts. I did it just to make that thread more pure with guides only So please do not mind |
|
|
|
Post by Captain on Dec 6, 2021 5:23:48 GMT
Deleted Can you join me to this group? I aslo passed the qualifications Tag me some of your guides so i can see them. I already tagged you there have you seen them |
|
.ย 
