|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Nov 12, 2021 2:46:31 GMT
Erich von Manstein, do you think cleopatra is worth it in the end game? I know there are generals with better stats, but I'm more concerned if her performance doesn't lag in the end game. She is endgame material for non-IAP. Cleopatra combined with Bismarck can provide 50% chance stun. As for artifacts, the two from the shop are nothing special. The best two are Gungnir and Bottle of Life. |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Nov 12, 2021 4:58:01 GMT
Erich von Manstein, do you think cleopatra is worth it in the end game? I know there are generals with better stats, but I'm more concerned if her performance doesn't lag in the end game. It is a debatable question. She's quite good and Rumor is a useful skill in many circumstances. But I personally prefer Khalid because he will provide a huge buff for my LiShimin. Besides, as mentioned above, you will get Bismarck for free at level 70 (you will unlock Hamburg), and he doesn't need any investments outside his Rumor. So, I would say: if you don't plan to get LiShimin then upgrading both Khalid and Cleopatra is a good idea; but if purchasing LiShimin is in your plans, then I would say Khalid is a more interesting option than Cleo in terms of synergy. But by no means Cleo is a pushover. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 12, 2021 7:04:35 GMT
Erich von Manstein , do you think cleopatra is worth it in the end game? I know there are generals with better stats, but I'm more concerned if her performance doesn't lag in the end game. It is a debatable question. She's quite good and Rumor is a useful skill in many circumstances. But I personally prefer Khalid because he will provide a huge buff for my LiShimin. Besides, as mentioned above, you will get Bismarck for free at level 70 (you will unlock Hamburg), and he doesn't need any investments outside his Rumor. So, I would say: if you don't plan to get LiShimin then upgrading both Khalid and Cleopatra is a good idea; but if purchasing LiShimin is in your plans, then I would say Khalid is a more interesting option than Cleo in terms of synergy. But by no means Cleo is a pushover. Cleopatra it is then  . I'm really liking archers and Artillery, they help Attila and Hannibal a lot. How about Hannibal? I plan investing in him along with some other cavs, but is he good in the end game? |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Nov 12, 2021 8:03:21 GMT
It is a debatable question. She's quite good and Rumor is a useful skill in many circumstances. But I personally prefer Khalid because he will provide a huge buff for my LiShimin. Besides, as mentioned above, you will get Bismarck for free at level 70 (you will unlock Hamburg), and he doesn't need any investments outside his Rumor. So, I would say: if you don't plan to get LiShimin then upgrading both Khalid and Cleopatra is a good idea; but if purchasing LiShimin is in your plans, then I would say Khalid is a more interesting option than Cleo in terms of synergy. But by no means Cleo is a pushover. Cleopatra it is then . I'm really liking archers and Artillery, they help Attila and Hannibal a lot. How about Hannibal? I plan investing in him along with some other cavs, but is he good in the end game? If you want you can. |
|
|
|
Post by mayankshadow on Nov 12, 2021 9:10:35 GMT
Erich von Manstein, do you think cleopatra is worth it in the end game? I know there are generals with better stats, but I'm more concerned if her performance doesn't lag in the end game. She gets mobility (the trait to attack again like cavs) and is quite nice for her price. She is good for 16 gen team. Although people who dont own nap or lishimin put her in 8 man team(although she is a woman) i suggest her combo with one arty comm gen(khalid or hechharchio) to increase over all stats. In 16 gen team 3 arty are almost must. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 12, 2021 9:13:35 GMT
Cleopatra it is then . I'm really liking archers and Artillery, they help Attila and Hannibal a lot. How about Hannibal? I plan investing in him along with some other cavs, but is he good in the end game? If you want you can. Neat. Thanks! Time to build the stronger Hannibal. That said, can you make a score list for the I. A. P generals? I know I said I won't buy any of them, but I'm having fun in this 6 year game that i may consider buying 1 of them. Hopefully I won't go down the EW4 path and buy everything, and I'm sorry stoic that I may betray the f2p path once again, but I swear I'll be f2p for ew7(hopefully khosrau won't be I. A. P). I'm seriously considering making a group for dedicated f2p players and make stoic the defacto leader. |
|
|
|
Post by mayankshadow on Nov 12, 2021 9:16:07 GMT
It is a debatable question. She's quite good and Rumor is a useful skill in many circumstances. But I personally prefer Khalid because he will provide a huge buff for my LiShimin. Besides, as mentioned above, you will get Bismarck for free at level 70 (you will unlock Hamburg), and he doesn't need any investments outside his Rumor. So, I would say: if you don't plan to get LiShimin then upgrading both Khalid and Cleopatra is a good idea; but if purchasing LiShimin is in your plans, then I would say Khalid is a more interesting option than Cleo in terms of synergy. But by no means Cleo is a pushover. Cleopatra it is then . I'm really liking archers and Artillery, they help Attila and Hannibal a lot. How about Hannibal? I plan investing in him along with some other cavs, but is he good in the end game? yups he is. He is a cheap genghis and weak too in comparison to him |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 12, 2021 9:16:21 GMT
Erich von Manstein , do you think cleopatra is worth it in the end game? I know there are generals with better stats, but I'm more concerned if her performance doesn't lag in the end game. She gets mobility (the trait to attack again like cavs) and is quite nice for her price. She is good for 16 gen team. Although people who dont own nap or lishimin put her in 8 man team(although she is a woman) i suggest her combo with one arty comm gen(khalid or hechharchio) to increase over all stats. In 16 gen team 3 arty are almost must. Too bad there isn't an 8 woman team, or maybe some mad lad made one. That said, cleopatra gets a slot in my end game team. She's great atm, so if she doesn't lose any steam, that's good enough for me. |
|
|
|
Post by mayankshadow on Nov 12, 2021 9:18:46 GMT
Deleted, You will want to get Nobunaga and Edward ASAP, and whenever you want some backup for your gen lineup, get Richard. VERY solid skills, strong, pretty cheap, purple, so upgrading him is less expensive. Gets great traits in 6 stars... Remember, you will get Barbarossa, Saladin, and (eventually) Bismarck for free, so take that into account. I would recommend at least one infantry (Alex for now, Barb later) in your lineup as they are tanky as ALL HECK. In case u guys missed inf got buffed now they have rage regen based on category(gold 30 purp 25 blue 20 grey 15) But dont insult me if it was in a previous update. I already told i am bad at update reminder |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Nov 12, 2021 10:13:26 GMT
Neat. Thanks! Time to build the stronger Hannibal. That said, can you make a score list for the I. A. P generals? I know I said I won't buy any of them, but I'm having fun in this 6 year game that i may consider buying 1 of them. Hopefully I won't go down the EW4 path and buy everything, and I'm sorry stoic that I may betray the f2p path once again, but I swear I'll be f2p for ew7(hopefully khosrau won't be I. A. P). I'm seriously considering making a group for dedicated f2p players and make stoic the defacto leader. Nah, there are too many groups already Hannibal is an excellent choice, in fact, and I have an honour to introduce him to the number of generals who were in the final lineups of players who completed the game (though, of course, we had many important updates since then). Hannibal together with Genghis Khan has the highest damage against Infantry at lvl 6. He can attack without retaliation and he can wield a mythological weapon or shield, since his first skill is bad and can be easily ignored. Besides, his defence is that of a purple general. Since Attilla and Suriyothai can also attack without counter, together they are able to eliminate the most dangerous opponents in a blink of an eye. If you are planning to use Hannibal, equip him with Gungnir, because Attilla is perfectly fine with regular weapons and his aura is more important than an active ability of a mythological weapon. Don't buy Khan, and probably you don't need Napoléon either, if you want to spend - buy Washington... His bonuses at lvl6 against all types of units are insane and he has excellent survivability. I simply ignore teams with Washington in arena, he is a real pain to face. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 12, 2021 10:29:36 GMT
Neat. Thanks! Time to build the stronger Hannibal. That said, can you make a score list for the I. A. P generals? I know I said I won't buy any of them, but I'm having fun in this 6 year game that i may consider buying 1 of them. Hopefully I won't go down the EW4 path and buy everything, and I'm sorry stoic that I may betray the f2p path once again, but I swear I'll be f2p for ew7(hopefully khosrau won't be I. A. P). I'm seriously considering making a group for dedicated f2p players and make stoic the defacto leader. Nah, there are too many groups already Hannibal is an excellent choice, in fact, and I have an honour to introduce him to the number of generals who were in the final lineups of players who completed the game (though, of course, we had many important updates since then). Hannibal together with Genghis Khan has the highest damage against Infantry at lvl 6. He can attack without retaliation and he can wield a mythological weapon or shield, since his first skill is bad and can be easily ignored. Besides, his defence is that of a purple general. Since Attilla and Suriyothai can also attack without counter, together they are able to eliminate the most dangerous opponents in a blink of an eye. If you are planning to use Hannibal, equip him with Gungnir, because Attilla is perfectly fine with regular weapons and his aura is more important than an active ability of a mythological weapon. Don't buy Khan, and probably you don't need Napoléon either, if you want to spend - buy Washington... His bonuses at lvl6 against all types of units are insane and he has excellent survivability. I simply ignore teams with Washington in arena, he is a real pain to face. I see, advice taken . I always wanted to keep Hannibal in my endgame lineup, so that's great to hear. Also, you sure you don't want to be the leader of the exclusive f2p group . |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Nov 12, 2021 10:56:25 GMT
Nah, there are too many groups already Hannibal is an excellent choice, in fact, and I have an honour to introduce him to the number of generals who were in the final lineups of players who completed the game (though, of course, we had many important updates since then). Hannibal together with Genghis Khan has the highest damage against Infantry at lvl 6. He can attack without retaliation and he can wield a mythological weapon or shield, since his first skill is bad and can be easily ignored. Besides, his defence is that of a purple general. Since Attilla and Suriyothai can also attack without counter, together they are able to eliminate the most dangerous opponents in a blink of an eye. If you are planning to use Hannibal, equip him with Gungnir, because Attilla is perfectly fine with regular weapons and his aura is more important than an active ability of a mythological weapon. Don't buy Khan, and probably you don't need Napoléon either, if you want to spend - buy Washington... His bonuses at lvl6 against all types of units are insane and he has excellent survivability. I simply ignore teams with Washington in arena, he is a real pain to face. I see, advice taken . I always wanted to keep Hannibal in my endgame lineup, so that's great to hear. Also, you sure you don't want to be the leader of the exclusive f2p group . He who defends everything defends nothing. Frederick the Great  I am f2p because I really enjoy to solve difficult problems with limited resources available. Don't think that other f2p players have the same standpoint. And there are indeed too many groups already... Probably there are more groups than active members |
|
|
|
Post by Iron Duke on Nov 12, 2021 11:03:53 GMT
I see, advice taken . I always wanted to keep Hannibal in my endgame lineup, so that's great to hear. Also, you sure you don't want to be the leader of the exclusive f2p group . He who defends everything defends nothing. Frederick the Great I am f2p because I really enjoy to solve difficult problems with limited resources available. Don't think that other f2p players have the same standpoint. And there are indeed too many groups already... Probably there are more groups than active members Correct. Some of us just don't like spending money |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 12, 2021 11:25:03 GMT
Iron Duke, stoic, I don't want to spend money, but i like the game, so why not . I'm also in the same boat when it comes to f2p, that's why I never spent in EW6 1914,despite how neat the blast and airstrike cards are. Anyway , after buying Washington and testing him out, I gotta say, I like him. That said, Should I upgrade Alexander past 3 stars ? Not sure if I should. Then again, he's the only infantry general I'm using, but do we even need infantry in the early-mid stages of the game? I'm also in medal debt, Washington taxed me, so what can I do.
|
|
|
|
Post by Iron Duke on Nov 12, 2021 13:15:57 GMT
Iron Duke , stoic , I don't want to spend money, but i like the game, so why not . I'm also in the same boat when it comes to f2p, that's why I never spent in EW6 1914,despite how neat the blast and airstrike cards are. Anyway , after buying Washington and testing him out, I gotta say, I like him. That said, Should I upgrade Alexander past 3 stars ? Not sure if I should. Then again, he's the only infantry general I'm using, but do we even need infantry in the early-mid stages of the game? I'm also in medal debt, Washington taxed me, so what can I do. I usually leave Alex at 2*. |
|
. I'm really liking archers and Artillery, they help Attila and Hannibal a lot. How about Hannibal? I plan investing in him along with some other cavs, but is he good in the end game? 
