|
|
Post by littlecorporal on Nov 16, 2021 8:13:58 GMT
Consider you can use 700 more medals to train and equip Kate. Not really sure myself.
|
|
|
|
Post by ππ²πΌπͺπ΄πͺ on Nov 16, 2021 15:39:41 GMT
Kate if you want a Admiral with pure skills if you want to pump some trainers for her naval skills.
Usokov is basically like Colinwood and Nelson with sea and land capability but with a mobility boost and maxed out naval stars
|
|
|
|
Post by littlecorporal on Nov 16, 2021 16:29:54 GMT
Ushakov and Kate are both navy/ artillery hybrids. Ushakov's big advantage is that he has accuracy; Kate 's is that she's free.
|
|
|
|
Post by ππ³π°π΅π΄π¬πΊ on Nov 16, 2021 17:25:29 GMT
Ushakov and Kate are both navy/ artillery hybrids. Ushakov's big advantage is that he has accuracy; Kate 's is that she's free. Only for artillery A bunker gives a 30% protection against naval attacks, but accurate works only on artillery. |
|
|
|
Post by sohpiasimp on Nov 16, 2021 18:37:24 GMT
Consider you can use 700 more medals to train and equip Kate. Not really sure myself. Kate is free and really easy to get, and she makes any early naval mission wayyy easier. She also does pretty decent damage on arty. Fireproof is very important. You dont have to buy the pumper for her (lotta medals) |
|
|
|
Post by John Marston on Nov 18, 2021 14:14:17 GMT
Consider you can use 700 more medals to train and equip Kate. Not really sure myself. Nah, Ushakov is much better. He does fine on artillery and 5 stars on navy are sweet. If you can invest 700 in Kate, then why not get Ushakov himself? |
|
|
|
Post by littlecorporal on Nov 18, 2021 16:56:03 GMT
Consider you can use 700 more medals to train and equip Kate. Not really sure myself. Nah, Ushakov is much better. He does fine on artillery and 5 stars on navy are sweet. If you can invest 700 in Kate, then why not get Ushakov himself? Accuracy is irreplaceable as a skill. |
|
|
|
Post by littlecorporal on Nov 28, 2021 6:09:01 GMT
Consider you can use 700 more medals to train and equip Kate. Not really sure myself. Nah, Ushakov is much better. He does fine on artillery and 5 stars on navy are sweet. If you can invest 700 in Kate, then why not get Ushakov himself? I feel like this is the answer. Both Kate and Ushakov are Navy/ Artillery hybrids and Ushakov is just better at both. Kate will take lower damage on ships because of steersman and fireproofοΌbut the 5 stars mean Ushakov is doing more damage. For artilleryοΌit's no contest. |
|
|
|
Post by pathdoc on Nov 29, 2021 1:56:58 GMT
Kate seems more like an admiral to me with her artillery talents being a side bonus. Much like Sophia is primarily an artillery general with cavalry as a secondary consideration. (I had planned to boost her cavalry stars to see just how good she could be, but since then I acquired Sakurako and she seems like a more natural fit for the role and a better use of repeatedly regrouped Agha.)
|
|
|
|
Post by ππ³π°π΅π΄π¬πΊ on Nov 29, 2021 15:29:47 GMT
Steersman is the good navy skill.
On my plays, I train Sophia, most times first on cavalary, because cavalary is great for princes runs. But Strike >> Siege Master + Spy. Sakurako is a really good Cavalary commander, better than Sophia.
|
|
|
|
Post by littlecorporal on Nov 29, 2021 15:47:55 GMT
Steersman is the good navy skill. On my plays, I train Sophia, most times first on cavalary, because cavalary is great for princes runs. But Strike >> Siege Master + Spy. Sakurako is a really good Cavalary commander, better than Sophia. What do you think about accuracy vs siege master and spy? I.e. Sophia vs Ushakov/ Sakurako? It hurts to say but I think Sophia is 3rd best. |
|
|
|
Post by pathdoc on Nov 29, 2021 16:28:57 GMT
littlecorporal, ππ³π°π΅π΄π¬πΊ, the answer lies in what you want to use them for. With Siege Master and Spy, Sophia is the best vs forts and units in cities. With Strike, Sakurako is stronger against units in the field (deprives evasion). They are both the best tool for a particular job.
|
|
|
|
Post by ππ³π°π΅π΄π¬πΊ on Nov 29, 2021 17:00:33 GMT
Steersman is the good navy skill. On my plays, I train Sophia, most times first on cavalary, because cavalary is great for princes runs. But Strike >> Siege Master + Spy. Sakurako is a really good Cavalary commander, better than Sophia. . What do you think about accuracy vs siege master and spy? I.e. Sophia vs Ushakov/ Sakurako? It hurts to say but I think Sophia is 3rd best. I think this is more complicate. A) cavalary sufferes most for terrain evasion, much more than artillery. Most fields are forrest (C:-20%, A:-10%) Mountains are quite rare, and if you have hills with trees, cavallary evasion is most times the higher one. So Strike > Accurate. B) My tactics: I usually don't attack big and large forts. But I bring ony my artillery commander in their range and attack someone distant enemy. For this reason spy is extremly good for artillery commander - it helps artillery to survive easy. So it is not so clear like for cavallary. I can't really rank Sakurako or Isabella (very simmilar) compared to Sophia, the way I use them is very different. I don't use Sophia for a field offense. |
|
|
|
Post by ππ³π°π΅π΄π¬πΊ on Nov 29, 2021 17:22:29 GMT
littlecorporal, ππ³π°π΅π΄π¬πΊ, the answer lies in what you want to use them for. With Siege Master and Spy, Sophia is the best vs forts and units in cities. With Strike, Sakurako is stronger against units in the field (deprives evasion). They are both the best tool for a particular job. I agree with all except: With Siege Master and Spy, Sophia is the best [ ] and units in cities.This is wrong! Siege Master is meh compared to the evasion skills. Only under good conditions: City, Stable, Factory must be on a on a flat tile, (no hills or tree), and only in the first two campaigns or 1798, Sophia hits avg +3 DMG higher than Sakurako or Isabella, and this because of explosives. All with same stars of course |
|
|
|
Post by littlecorporal on Nov 30, 2021 2:29:08 GMT
littlecorporal, ππ³π°π΅π΄π¬πΊ, the answer lies in what you want to use them for. With Siege Master and Spy, Sophia is the best vs forts and units in cities. With Strike, Sakurako is stronger against units in the field (deprives evasion). They are both the best tool for a particular job. I agree with all except: With Siege Master and Spy, Sophia is the best [ ] and units in cities.This is wrong! Siege Master is meh compared to the evasion skills. Only under good conditions: City, Stable, Factory must be on a on a flat tile, (no hills or tree), and only in the first two campaigns or 1798, Sophia hits avg +3 DMG higher than Sakurako or Isabella, and this because of explosives. All with same stars of courseDo you ever put Sakurako on artillery? She's also pretty strong. I feel like after explaining the drawbacks of siege master it only makes the case for Ushakov stronger. He's better than Scharnhorst too I think because of his naval skills. |
|
