comrademaria
First Lieutenant
Fighting terrorism to regain world peace
Posts: 17
|
Post by comrademaria on Apr 24, 2022 20:51:36 GMT
I have infantry and navy 6, tank 7, and artillery 8, does anyone have a 1950 conquest guide that would work with moderate-quality generals and not require me to support Capitalism? I have already beast 3-star conquest 1939, 1943, and  ?, but cannot handle a conquest in which the enemy has nukes, because they take out my generals, and my tactics to clear endless UFOs could certainly work on Super Tanks, but if the enemy has H-bombs, they can clear out some of my rocket artillery, while weakening the rest enough for Assault to let them clear the whole formation. |
|
comrademaria
First Lieutenant
Fighting terrorism to regain world peace
Posts: 17
|
Post by comrademaria on Apr 24, 2022 20:53:49 GMT
Sorry for the glitch, I did not want an emoji, I was putting question marks to try to list the conquest name. I meant I beat the 1975 conquest as the USSR
|
|
|
|
Post by Just One Bite on Apr 25, 2022 6:34:21 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by resiphius on Apr 30, 2022 14:32:40 GMT
I have infantry and navy 6, tank 7, and artillery 8, does anyone have a 1950 conquest guide that would work with moderate-quality generals and not require me to support Capitalism? I have already beast 3-star conquest 1939, 1943, and ?, but cannot handle a conquest in which the enemy has nukes, because they take out my generals, and my tactics to clear endless UFOs could certainly work on Super Tanks, but if the enemy has H-bombs, they can clear out some of my rocket artillery, while weakening the rest enough for Assault to let them clear the whole formation. PRC is the safest choice in both 1950 and 1960, since you can go either way after clearing the western pacific: go west to support USSR and the Middle East or go east to back stab the European NATOs via the Americas. However, if you want some challenge, I suggest 1950 Egypt or Iran and 1960 Iran, just chew through the Balkans and quickly secure Lyon, then you can start throwing missiles and nukes back to those who had throwing them to you. For generals I suggest you to get Göring, Franco and a Free Commander with Lv4 econ and metal boost skill, add Eisenhower if you willing to paid real money. Just make them sit in high level cities away from frontline and only move when you clear a better city out of the enemies’ ICBM range. For tech-tree, you need high level airforce and at least Lv2 Anti-air missiles, a few clicks on supply and artillery are icing on the cake, upgrade missile and nuke too if you prefer, also if you have unused medals to spend, orbital cannon is also a choice. For tactics, I massed rocket launchers in tandem with mechanized infantries or special forces, with a handful of field guns guarding shoreline properties. Depending on how fierce the Nato airforce pounds your force, you may need to deploy AAA along the attack path, remember to put cannon fodders in 2nd line cities to draw some nuke away. |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Apr 30, 2022 20:49:42 GMT
I have infantry and navy 6, tank 7, and artillery 8, does anyone have a 1950 conquest guide that would work with moderate-quality generals and not require me to support Capitalism? I have already beast 3-star conquest 1939, 1943, and ?, but cannot handle a conquest in which the enemy has nukes, because they take out my generals, and my tactics to clear endless UFOs could certainly work on Super Tanks, but if the enemy has H-bombs, they can clear out some of my rocket artillery, while weakening the rest enough for Assault to let them clear the whole formation. PRC is the safest choice in both 1950 and 1960, since you can go either way after clearing the western pacific: go west to support USSR and the Middle East or go east to back stab the European NATOs via the Americas. However, if you want some challenge, I suggest 1950 Egypt or Iran and 1960 Iran, just chew through the Balkans and quickly secure Lyon, then you can start throwing missiles and nukes back to those who had throwing them to you. For generals I suggest you to get Göring, Franco and a Free Commander with Lv4 econ and metal boost skill, add Eisenhower if you willing to paid real money. Just make them sit in high level cities away from frontline and only move when you clear a better city out of the enemies’ ICBM range. For tech-tree, you need high level airforce and at least Lv2 Anti-air missiles, a few clicks on supply and artillery are icing on the cake, upgrade missile and nuke too if you prefer, also if you have unused medals to spend, orbital cannon is also a choice. For tactics, I massed rocket launchers in tandem with mechanized infantries or special forces, with a handful of field guns guarding shoreline properties. Depending on how fierce the Nato airforce pounds your force, you may need to deploy AAA along the attack path, remember to put cannon fodders in 2nd line cities to draw some nuke away. You are begging for nukes by letting generals stay in cities. Franco is definitely a no-go. A good combat general should be able to do more, especially in 1960 when everyone is more obsessive with nukes. |
|
|
|
Post by resiphius on May 1, 2022 8:08:14 GMT
PRC is the safest choice in both 1950 and 1960, since you can go either way after clearing the western pacific: go west to support USSR and the Middle East or go east to back stab the European NATOs via the Americas. However, if you want some challenge, I suggest 1950 Egypt or Iran and 1960 Iran, just chew through the Balkans and quickly secure Lyon, then you can start throwing missiles and nukes back to those who had throwing them to you. For generals I suggest you to get Göring, Franco and a Free Commander with Lv4 econ and metal boost skill, add Eisenhower if you willing to paid real money. Just make them sit in high level cities away from frontline and only move when you clear a better city out of the enemies’ ICBM range. For tech-tree, you need high level airforce and at least Lv2 Anti-air missiles, a few clicks on supply and artillery are icing on the cake, upgrade missile and nuke too if you prefer, also if you have unused medals to spend, orbital cannon is also a choice. For tactics, I massed rocket launchers in tandem with mechanized infantries or special forces, with a handful of field guns guarding shoreline properties. Depending on how fierce the Nato airforce pounds your force, you may need to deploy AAA along the attack path, remember to put cannon fodders in 2nd line cities to draw some nuke away. You are begging for nukes by letting generals stay in cities. Franco is definitely a no-go. A good combat general should be able to do more, especially in 1960 when everyone is more obsessive with nukes. Then I must be too lucky to pull off my tactics in both 1950 and 1960 PRC lol, because neither my commander, Göring or Franco died sitting in Nanking, Shanghai or Seoul, and most of the nukes I ate happened in Europe and Balkans, half the map away from any of my generals. The only time I lost a general was the good combat general Guderian ate a H-bomb offshore Hawaii, so I guess R’lyeh counts as city lol. Oh and one more thing, I guess you don’t know the fact that AI has a hobby of nuking any commanded unit with 350hp or more regardless if he is in a city or not (less so if it is not in combat), and high value unit in a big city is also nuke magnet regardless if it has a general aboard or not. Given that Göring with his Marshal ranking on a commando has only 355hp at max and less for Franco on the same infantry, AI will most likely just clip them some hp and get distracted by other preferred targets. (In my case, rocket launchers in cities like Moscow, Tokyo or Athens) |
|
|
|
Post by Just One Bite on May 1, 2022 10:13:51 GMT
I have infantry and navy 6, tank 7, and artillery 8, does anyone have a 1950 conquest guide that would work with moderate-quality generals and not require me to support Capitalism? I have already beast 3-star conquest 1939, 1943, and  ?, but cannot handle a conquest in which the enemy has nukes, because they take out my generals, and my tactics to clear endless UFOs could certainly work on Super Tanks, but if the enemy has H-bombs, they can clear out some of my rocket artillery, while weakening the rest enough for Assault to let them clear the whole formation. PRC is the safest choice in both 1950 and 1960, since you can go either way after clearing the western pacific: go west to support USSR and the Middle East or go east to back stab the European NATOs via the Americas. However, if you want some challenge, I suggest 1950 Egypt or Iran and 1960 Iran, just chew through the Balkans and quickly secure Lyon, then you can start throwing missiles and nukes back to those who had throwing them to you. For generals I suggest you to get Göring, Franco and a Free Commander with Lv4 econ and metal boost skill, add Eisenhower if you willing to paid real money. Just make them sit in high level cities away from frontline and only move when you clear a better city out of the enemies’ ICBM range. For tech-tree, you need high level airforce and at least Lv2 Anti-air missiles, a few clicks on supply and artillery are icing on the cake, upgrade missile and nuke too if you prefer, also if you have unused medals to spend, orbital cannon is also a choice. For tactics, I massed rocket launchers in tandem with mechanized infantries or special forces, with a handful of field guns guarding shoreline properties. Depending on how fierce the Nato airforce pounds your force, you may need to deploy AAA along the attack path, remember to put cannon fodders in 2nd line cities to draw some nuke away. In this game, econ and indus expert aren't that useful, you're better off taking cities to boost your economy. The only nuke-free zones are parts of the Middle East, Africa, and Brazil, but unless you want your general to sit in Cairo air-striking enemies, these regions are largely ignored by the enemies. What I usually do is deploy strong arty and tank generals early game, and as long as they secure enough cities to spam super tanks in Europe, I don't care if they get nuked. The only time that I use an air general is when Shanghai is captured and I throw down Göring that is ready to missile everything. Anti air is a double-edged sword. Yes you receive less damage coming from airstrikes and missiles, but that doesn't stop enemies from simply nuke-taking the city, and it'll be extra effort to retake it back. Anti air gun level 1 is sufficient in most cases to deter enemies from airstriking the city. I prefer super tanks over any kind of artillery spam. Even though they're the most expensive land unit, they do a lot better than artillery in clearing out paratroopers, which is the main method of enemy resistance, not to mention they're durable enough to soak a missile strike and walk it off like it's a minor scratch. |
|
|
|
Post by Just One Bite on May 1, 2022 10:32:38 GMT
You are begging for nukes by letting generals stay in cities. Franco is definitely a no-go. A good combat general should be able to do more, especially in 1960 when everyone is more obsessive with nukes. Then I must be too lucky to pull off my tactics in both 1950 and 1960 PRC lol, because neither my commander, Göring or Franco died sitting in Nanking, Shanghai or Seoul, and most of the nukes I ate happened in Europe and Balkans, half the map away from any of my generals. The only time I lost a general was the good combat general Guderian ate a H-bomb offshore Hawaii, so I guess R’lyeh counts as city lol. Oh and one more thing, I guess you don’t know the fact that AI has a hobby of nuking any commanded unit with 350hp or more regardless if he is in a city or not (less so if it is not in combat), and high value unit in a big city is also nuke magnet regardless if it has a general aboard or not. Given that Göring with his Marshal ranking on a commando has only 355hp at max and less for Franco on the same infantry, AI will most likely just clip them some hp and get distracted by other preferred targets. (In my case, rocket launchers in cities like Moscow, Tokyo or Athens) USA loves nukes. Not because it's a maniac, but because it literally has no one else to deploy it to, and it isn't gonna leave its missiles stored away in Midway, Anchorage, and Los Angeles. USA's favourite targets are capital cities such as Seoul, Pyongyang, and (especially)Tokyo, but it won't hesitate on nuking a low health general resting in a city. |
|
|
|
Post by resiphius on May 1, 2022 14:42:49 GMT
PRC is the safest choice in both 1950 and 1960, since you can go either way after clearing the western pacific: go west to support USSR and the Middle East or go east to back stab the European NATOs via the Americas. However, if you want some challenge, I suggest 1950 Egypt or Iran and 1960 Iran, just chew through the Balkans and quickly secure Lyon, then you can start throwing missiles and nukes back to those who had throwing them to you. For generals I suggest you to get Göring, Franco and a Free Commander with Lv4 econ and metal boost skill, add Eisenhower if you willing to paid real money. Just make them sit in high level cities away from frontline and only move when you clear a better city out of the enemies’ ICBM range. For tech-tree, you need high level airforce and at least Lv2 Anti-air missiles, a few clicks on supply and artillery are icing on the cake, upgrade missile and nuke too if you prefer, also if you have unused medals to spend, orbital cannon is also a choice. For tactics, I massed rocket launchers in tandem with mechanized infantries or special forces, with a handful of field guns guarding shoreline properties. Depending on how fierce the Nato airforce pounds your force, you may need to deploy AAA along the attack path, remember to put cannon fodders in 2nd line cities to draw some nuke away. In this game, econ and indus expert aren't that useful, you're better off taking cities to boost your economy. The only nuke-free zones are parts of the Middle East, Africa, and Brazil, but unless you want your general to sit in Cairo air-striking enemies, these regions are largely ignored by the enemies. What I usually do is deploy strong arty and tank generals early game, and as long as they secure enough cities to spam super tanks in Europe, I don't care if they get nuked. The only time that I use an air general is when Shanghai is captured and I throw down Göring that is ready to missile everything. Anti air is a double-edged sword. Yes you receive less damage coming from airstrikes and missiles, but that doesn't stop enemies from simply nuke-taking the city, and it'll be extra effort to retake it back. Anti air gun level 1 is sufficient in most cases to deter enemies from airstriking the city. I prefer super tanks over any kind of artillery spam. Even though they're the most expensive land unit, they do a lot better than artillery in clearing out paratroopers, which is the main method of enemy resistance, not to mention they're durable enough to soak a missile strike and walk it off like it's a minor scratch. Not sure what extra effort a Lv 4 SAM could cause me in the case of an enemy nuke taking my city, since I rarely hold a place my main force cannot reinforce in short notice, and if I do it’s more likely a sabotage move. |
|
|
|
Post by resiphius on May 1, 2022 18:46:51 GMT
Then I must be too lucky to pull off my tactics in both 1950 and 1960 PRC lol, because neither my commander, Göring or Franco died sitting in Nanking, Shanghai or Seoul, and most of the nukes I ate happened in Europe and Balkans, half the map away from any of my generals. The only time I lost a general was the good combat general Guderian ate a H-bomb offshore Hawaii, so I guess R’lyeh counts as city lol. Oh and one more thing, I guess you don’t know the fact that AI has a hobby of nuking any commanded unit with 350hp or more regardless if he is in a city or not (less so if it is not in combat), and high value unit in a big city is also nuke magnet regardless if it has a general aboard or not. Given that Göring with his Marshal ranking on a commando has only 355hp at max and less for Franco on the same infantry, AI will most likely just clip them some hp and get distracted by other preferred targets. (In my case, rocket launchers in cities like Moscow, Tokyo or Athens) USA loves nukes. Not because it's a maniac, but because it literally has no one else to deploy it to, and it isn't gonna leave its missiles stored away in Midway, Anchorage, and Los Angeles. USA's favourite targets are capital cities such as Seoul, Pyongyang, and (especially)Tokyo, but it won't hesitate on nuking a low health general resting in a city. Just telling you that CN players had already figured out the AI’s nuke preference long time ago, so it’s not USA hesitated on nuking my generals in cities but the AI playing USA doesn’t see a particular need to nuke them, and that’s what actually happened. |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on May 2, 2022 5:10:13 GMT
You are begging for nukes by letting generals stay in cities. Franco is definitely a no-go. A good combat general should be able to do more, especially in 1960 when everyone is more obsessive with nukes. Then I must be too lucky to pull off my tactics in both 1950 and 1960 PRC lol, because neither my commander, Göring or Franco died sitting in Nanking, Shanghai or Seoul, and most of the nukes I ate happened in Europe and Balkans, half the map away from any of my generals. The only time I lost a general was the good combat general Guderian ate a H-bomb offshore Hawaii, so I guess R’lyeh counts as city lol. Oh and one more thing, I guess you don’t know the fact that AI has a hobby of nuking any commanded unit with 350hp or more regardless if he is in a city or not (less so if it is not in combat), and high value unit in a big city is also nuke magnet regardless if it has a general aboard or not. Given that Göring with his Marshal ranking on a commando has only 355hp at max and less for Franco on the same infantry, AI will most likely just clip them some hp and get distracted by other preferred targets. (In my case, rocket launchers in cities like Moscow, Tokyo or Athens) Ah so that's where you put them. I thought they are stationed at the front line at Athens or something. Of course you won't get nuked, it's Asia! 1950 is more missiles than nukes and the only nuclear threat to PRC in 1960 comes from Manila, which is within close reach. You do know that the additional income generated by generals is just slightly more than a lvl 1 city right? So why don't I use a combat general to take a city faster instead? Unfortunately, I am aware of that nuking threshold (we do have members stopping by baidu every now and then), but I don't think it's 350. IIRC it's more likely to be 300 or something like that, because if the threshold is 350 then Guderian on a super tank would be safe. Marshal Meretskov in Khabarovsk always gets nuked and he's on a commando. Well anyway, it's been the long time since the last time I lost Guderian/Patton to nukes as 1960 Saudi. |
|
|
|
Post by resiphius on May 2, 2022 9:32:11 GMT
Then I must be too lucky to pull off my tactics in both 1950 and 1960 PRC lol, because neither my commander, Göring or Franco died sitting in Nanking, Shanghai or Seoul, and most of the nukes I ate happened in Europe and Balkans, half the map away from any of my generals. The only time I lost a general was the good combat general Guderian ate a H-bomb offshore Hawaii, so I guess R’lyeh counts as city lol. Oh and one more thing, I guess you don’t know the fact that AI has a hobby of nuking any commanded unit with 350hp or more regardless if he is in a city or not (less so if it is not in combat), and high value unit in a big city is also nuke magnet regardless if it has a general aboard or not. Given that Göring with his Marshal ranking on a commando has only 355hp at max and less for Franco on the same infantry, AI will most likely just clip them some hp and get distracted by other preferred targets. (In my case, rocket launchers in cities like Moscow, Tokyo or Athens) Ah so that's where you put them. I thought they are stationed at the front line at Athens or something. Of course you won't get nuked, it's Asia! 1950 is more missiles than nukes and the only nuclear threat to PRC in 1960 comes from Manila, which is within close reach. You do know that the additional income generated by generals is just slightly more than a lvl 1 city right? So why don't I use a combat general to take a city faster instead? Unfortunately, I am aware of that nuking threshold (we do have members stopping by baidu every now and then), but I don't think it's 350. IIRC it's more likely to be 300 or something like that, because if the threshold is 350 then Guderian on a super tank would be safe. Marshal Meretskov in Khabarovsk always gets nuked and he's on a commando. Well anyway, it's been the long time since the last time I lost Guderian/Patton to nukes as 1960 Saudi. Combat status matters, 350 is only for those aren’t in combat (or in close proximity to opposing force units), for frontline generals you will need to be under 300. As for combat generals I do employ artillery or artillery-carrier ECs and Guderian but like I said before, having them away from properties doesn’t prevent them from becoming ground zeros, and since WC3 doesn’t require you to win in 100 rounds like Glory of Generals nor it would rate your efficiency like WC4, so I don’t feel the necessity of having them pushing the front fast. However, if such need arises, it only means I’m too dumb to forget preparing a second front for that beforehand. |
|
|
|
Post by resiphius on May 2, 2022 10:15:51 GMT
Then I must be too lucky to pull off my tactics in both 1950 and 1960 PRC lol, because neither my commander, Göring or Franco died sitting in Nanking, Shanghai or Seoul, and most of the nukes I ate happened in Europe and Balkans, half the map away from any of my generals. The only time I lost a general was the good combat general Guderian ate a H-bomb offshore Hawaii, so I guess R’lyeh counts as city lol. Oh and one more thing, I guess you don’t know the fact that AI has a hobby of nuking any commanded unit with 350hp or more regardless if he is in a city or not (less so if it is not in combat), and high value unit in a big city is also nuke magnet regardless if it has a general aboard or not. Given that Göring with his Marshal ranking on a commando has only 355hp at max and less for Franco on the same infantry, AI will most likely just clip them some hp and get distracted by other preferred targets. (In my case, rocket launchers in cities like Moscow, Tokyo or Athens) USA loves nukes. Not because it's a maniac, but because it literally has no one else to deploy it to, and it isn't gonna leave its missiles stored away in Midway, Anchorage, and Los Angeles. USA's favourite targets are capital cities such as Seoul, Pyongyang, and (especially)Tokyo, but it won't hesitate on nuking a low health general resting in a city. Just telling you that I’m playing 1960 Portugal now and guess what? I met a Rokossovsky supertank with 1/4 life last standing in Oslo for rounds while UK on the other side of the North Sea just decided to watch somebody aka me to go get him, perhaps Horthy and the Pol people are not handsome enough to make those gentlemen hesitate on nuking them lol. And yes USA is just maniac, as whenever I playing 1960 Brazil, Portugal or Spain, I found my units having fair chance of receiving collateral damages near Andros of Bahamas just because it nuked whatever USSR tried to build on the island with H-bomb. |
|
|
|
Post by Just One Bite on May 2, 2022 12:10:25 GMT
In this game, econ and indus expert aren't that useful, you're better off taking cities to boost your economy. The only nuke-free zones are parts of the Middle East, Africa, and Brazil, but unless you want your general to sit in Cairo air-striking enemies, these regions are largely ignored by the enemies. What I usually do is deploy strong arty and tank generals early game, and as long as they secure enough cities to spam super tanks in Europe, I don't care if they get nuked. The only time that I use an air general is when Shanghai is captured and I throw down Göring that is ready to missile everything. Anti air is a double-edged sword. Yes you receive less damage coming from airstrikes and missiles, but that doesn't stop enemies from simply nuke-taking the city, and it'll be extra effort to retake it back. Anti air gun level 1 is sufficient in most cases to deter enemies from airstriking the city. I prefer super tanks over any kind of artillery spam. Even though they're the most expensive land unit, they do a lot better than artillery in clearing out paratroopers, which is the main method of enemy resistance, not to mention they're durable enough to soak a missile strike and walk it off like it's a minor scratch. Not sure what extra effort a Lv 4 SAM could cause me in the case of an enemy nuke taking my city, since I rarely hold a place my main force cannot reinforce in short notice, and if I do it’s more likely a sabotage move. The extra effort comes when it's your forward base gets nuke-taked and you're forced to halt your offensive on an objective city, and extra money is needed to recapture the city when the surrounding units aren't strong enough to recapture it in one turn. This process will cost a few turns with you having no net gain in progress. |
|
|
|
Post by Just One Bite on May 2, 2022 12:13:45 GMT
USA loves nukes. Not because it's a maniac, but because it literally has no one else to deploy it to, and it isn't gonna leave its missiles stored away in Midway, Anchorage, and Los Angeles. USA's favourite targets are capital cities such as Seoul, Pyongyang, and (especially)Tokyo, but it won't hesitate on nuking a low health general resting in a city. Just telling you that I’m playing 1960 Portugal now and guess what? I met a Rokossovsky supertank with 1/4 life last standing in Oslo for rounds while UK on the other side of the North Sea just decided to watch somebody aka me to go get him, perhaps Horthy and the Pol people are not handsome enough to make those gentlemen hesitate on nuking them lol. And yes USA is just maniac, as whenever I playing 1960 Brazil, Portugal or Spain, I found my units having fair chance of receiving collateral damages near Andros of Bahamas just because it nuked whatever USSR tried to build on the island with H-bomb. That's UK and France AI for ya. At least they're hinting you at taking those cities they missiled instead of dealing with Roko first. |
|
?, but cannot handle a conquest in which the enemy has nukes, because they take out my generals, and my tactics to clear endless UFOs could certainly work on Super Tanks, but if the enemy has H-bombs, they can clear out some of my rocket artillery, while weakening the rest enough for Assault to let them clear the whole formation.
?, but cannot handle a conquest in which the enemy has nukes, because they take out my generals, and my tactics to clear endless UFOs could certainly work on Super Tanks, but if the enemy has H-bombs, they can clear out some of my rocket artillery, while weakening the rest enough for Assault to let them clear the whole formation.
