|
|
Post by Josip Broz Tito on Oct 26, 2022 3:38:30 GMT
Alright, I don't see very much, but there is also a bit of a privacy issue. You put it using an address with your real name on it. You also have your name on your email, but I suppose I shall change my email name to something more ambiguous. Thanks for pointing this out. |
|
|
|
Post by Josip Broz Tito on Oct 26, 2022 3:50:02 GMT
Y'know what, I'll just make a new document on a personal email. I sent you the invitation.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Oct 26, 2022 11:32:26 GMT
Should Roosevelt be playable?
|
|
|
|
Post by Josip Broz Tito on Oct 27, 2022 4:23:36 GMT
Should Roosevelt be playable? Maybe. But I don’t think we should code 3 way because the maker of Viva Kennedy said that coding VK1968 Wallace was hell. Let’s stick to a two-way race. |
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Oct 27, 2022 11:18:36 GMT
Should Roosevelt be playable? Maybe. But I don’t think we should code 3 way because the maker of Viva Kennedy said that coding VK1968 Wallace was hell. Let’s stick to a two-way race. Alright. Way to get that crowd fired up. |
|
|
|
Post by Josip Broz Tito on Oct 27, 2022 12:06:58 GMT
Maybe. But I don’t think we should code 3 way because the maker of Viva Kennedy said that coding VK1968 Wallace was hell. Let’s stick to a two-way race. Alright. Way to get that crowd fired up. I think I found your reddit: u/Late_Notice8742 |
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Oct 27, 2022 16:07:06 GMT
Alright. Way to get that crowd fired up. I think I found your reddit: u/Late_Notice8742 Yup. You can message me there. |
|
|
|
Post by Josip Broz Tito on Oct 27, 2022 18:40:34 GMT
I think I found your reddit: u/Late_Notice8742 Yup. You can message me there. Cool. Anyways, I have a few ideas/questions: - RNG. On the one hand, it is thrilling. On the other, it's deflating and skill-deprived. Should we use it? - Endorsements. I think Bryan and McKinley should bid for the support of Carnegie and maybe even Roosevelt, as Roosevelt is a progressive. - Who should have the advantage at the start? Probably Bryan, but by how much? - Scandals? Obviously Bryan won't have any, but perhaps McKinley has some skeletons in his closet. Or Bryan could attack McKinley on a conspiracy that turns out to be fake and take a huge dip in the polls. |
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Oct 27, 2022 19:40:11 GMT
Yup. You can message me there. Cool. Anyways, I have a few ideas/questions: - RNG. On the one hand, it is thrilling. On the other, it's deflating and skill-deprived. Should we use it? - Endorsements. I think Bryan and McKinley should bid for the support of Carnegie and maybe even Roosevelt, as Roosevelt is a progressive. - Who should have the advantage at the start? Probably Bryan, but by how much? - Scandals? Obviously Bryan won't have any, but perhaps McKinley has some skeletons in his closet. Or Bryan could attack McKinley on a conspiracy that turns out to be fake and take a huge dip in the polls. -RNG should only be used for debates, special events (like health) and endorsements. Anything else and it is superfluous, and it should only be about 3 times a game. -Sure thing. Carnegie would obviously be predisposed to support McKinley, due to Bryan's avid disavowing of him. I would remind you that McKinley, while not a progressive, was a rather moderate Republican who only announced his support for the gold standard a couple weeks before the RNC. Roosevelt canonically runs, so both of them canonically fail, right? -I would guess about a one to three point lead for Bryan at the beginning. Even the success of the Spanish-American War won't do much to overcome the insane partisanship of the time. -Both of them were absolutely straight as an arrow. There are absolutely zero scandals that could happen. That's one of the reasons why I love the 1896 and 1900 elections - both candidates were great people. On the contrary, the running mates of both parties are less than savory when it comes to character. |
|
|
|
Post by Josip Broz Tito on Oct 28, 2022 2:18:28 GMT
Cool. Anyways, I have a few ideas/questions: - RNG. On the one hand, it is thrilling. On the other, it's deflating and skill-deprived. Should we use it? - Endorsements. I think Bryan and McKinley should bid for the support of Carnegie and maybe even Roosevelt, as Roosevelt is a progressive. - Who should have the advantage at the start? Probably Bryan, but by how much? - Scandals? Obviously Bryan won't have any, but perhaps McKinley has some skeletons in his closet. Or Bryan could attack McKinley on a conspiracy that turns out to be fake and take a huge dip in the polls. -RNG should only be used for debates, special events (like health) and endorsements. Anything else and it is superfluous, and it should only be about 3 times a game. -Sure thing. Carnegie would obviously be predisposed to support McKinley, due to Bryan's avid disavowing of him. I would remind you that McKinley, while not a progressive, was a rather moderate Republican who only announced his support for the gold standard a couple weeks before the RNC. Roosevelt canonically runs, so both of them canonically fail, right? -I would guess about a one to three point lead for Bryan at the beginning. Even the success of the Spanish-American War won't do much to overcome the insane partisanship of the time. -Both of them were absolutely straight as an arrow. There are absolutely zero scandals that could happen. That's one of the reasons why I love the 1896 and 1900 elections - both candidates were great people. On the contrary, the running mates of both parties are less than savory when it comes to character. 1. Maybe we should drop Roosevelt. Again, it's not too plausible and his presence would be a huge blow to McKinley (as Roosevelt would have lots of support in NY). 2. Maybe, say, the Bryan campaign is told by some source, that has dirt on McKinley, but the dirt turns out to be fake. |
|
|
|
Post by Josip Broz Tito on Oct 28, 2022 2:22:55 GMT
Also, when did Bryan disavow Carnegie? Carnegie strongly opposed American imperialism, which Bryan also opposed. Carnegie also supported progressive taxation later in life.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Oct 30, 2022 0:25:20 GMT
Also, when did Bryan disavow Carnegie? Carnegie strongly opposed American imperialism, which Bryan also opposed. Carnegie also supported progressive taxation later in life. He was also a huge industrialist, which Bryan absolutely hated. It was more a disavowing of all industrialists (no matter the person) than Carnegie specifically. |
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Oct 31, 2022 20:47:25 GMT
Alright, I won't be able to code this within, like, two years, so don't expect any real amounts of help on that front.
|
|
|
|
Post by jeanniegarrett on Nov 12, 2022 7:32:20 GMT
mod game are always what I've been waiting for, it's smooth and runs great, thank you for creating it techloky.com/ |
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Nov 20, 2022 20:24:03 GMT
|
|
