|
|
Post by Josip Broz Tito on Nov 20, 2022 23:30:25 GMT
Alright. I’ll do it then, but it might take up to a year. If you cannot write the code, would you help me write some of the questions? |
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Nov 21, 2022 0:25:19 GMT
Alright. I’ll do it then, but it might take up to a year. If you cannot write the code, would you help me write some of the questions? Sure thing! |
|
|
|
Post by Josip Broz Tito on Dec 3, 2022 5:18:06 GMT
Gerd von Rundstedt Please check out some of the questions I wrote on the doc. Thanks! Sorry for pinging.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Dec 3, 2022 16:19:50 GMT
These questions are absolutely fantastic! One small exception, Tom Watson really wasn't hated all that much. Most people really didn't care much about him, it was really only the party bosses that despised him (that is, in 1900). He would definitely shore up support among progressives in the vein of a John Atgeld. Yes, he would hurt the ticket, but he wouldn't destroy it. Furthermore, answering very racist on Civil Rights shouldn't kill your campaign in the north. A full tenth seems like a bit much. I would say that -0.02 would be a better fit.
|
|
|
|
Post by Josip Broz Tito on Dec 3, 2022 16:49:02 GMT
These questions are absolutely fantastic! One small exception, Tom Watson really wasn't hated all that much. Most people really didn't care much about him, it was really only the party bosses that despised him (that is, in 1900). He would definitely shore up support among progressives in the vein of a John Atgeld. Yes, he would hurt the ticket, but he wouldn't destroy it. Furthermore, answering very racist on Civil Rights shouldn't kill your campaign in the north. A full tenth seems like a bit much. I would say that -0.02 would be a better fit. Sure. I guess I’ll reduce the debuff for Watson. As for the racist answer, I would probably make it -0.05 or something similar. |
|
|
|
Post by Josip Broz Tito on Dec 4, 2022 8:08:11 GMT
Gerd von Rundstedt Sorry to ping again, but could you help me find judges that Bryan would nominate in 1897, following the resignation of Stephen Johnson Field?
|
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Dec 4, 2022 18:34:04 GMT
The only real one I could find would be Thomas Gregory.
|
|
|
|
Post by Josip Broz Tito on Dec 4, 2022 22:42:48 GMT
The only real one I could find would be Thomas Gregory. The other one I think could be interesting is Bryan’s 1st cousin William Sherman Jennings. |
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Dec 4, 2022 23:17:24 GMT
The only real one I could find would be Thomas Gregory. The other one I think could be interesting is Bryan’s 1st cousin William Sherman Jennings. My man was related to everyone, wasn't he? |
|
|
|
Post by Josip Broz Tito on Dec 27, 2022 3:45:24 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Josip Broz Tito on Dec 31, 2022 17:52:21 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Arthur Currie on Dec 31, 2022 22:01:21 GMT
Be Patient, everyone's on holidays. He's probably taking a break. |
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Jan 3, 2023 19:32:22 GMT
My apologies, I will look at them right now.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Jan 3, 2023 19:56:26 GMT
Josip Broz Tito, Alright, this writing is honestly VK level. I highly anticipate the mod, and believe that it will be one of my favorites. Some things that would be nice to improve: - The advisor feedback for 6c&d and 9c&d specifically seem a little too aggressive and out of place in a mod where the advisor feedback is pretty tame. Can I suggest as alternatives: "Bland-Allison was highly unpopular, and it was one of your greatest foes four years ago. Such a quick change of mind is rarely politically profitable, so expect to lose a lot of votes." "The Cross of Gold was considered one of the greatest speeches in history, yet you chop it down so soon? The only crucifixion that will occur is yours (politically that is)." "Capitol Hill is grateful for your deference to the Supreme Court. Your supporters, on the other hand, most definitely are not." "No! No! Thousands of Noes upon you!" - In addition to the bonus from the endorsements, with Carnegie, it should affect Labor by -0.2 with importance of 10 and Borah should affect Currency by 0.5 with importance of 5. Furthermore, why would Tammany help Bryan win PA? It was only in NYC, right? Instead of the Pennsylvanian bonus, maybe implement a McKinley effect by -0.05 in New York, truly cementing Bryan's lead. - Henry Teller didn't actually care that much about tariffs. If anything (which I doubt he should do), he should help Bryan by showing bipartisanship on the ticket. I would just have him with the same response as the other running mates. That's all for Bryan, I'll probably do McKinley tomorrow.
|
|
|
|
Post by Josip Broz Tito on Jan 4, 2023 8:24:27 GMT
Josip Broz Tito , Alright, this writing is honestly VK level. I highly anticipate the mod, and believe that it will be one of my favorites. Some things that would be nice to improve: - The advisor feedback for 6c&d and 9c&d specifically seem a little too aggressive and out of place in a mod where the advisor feedback is pretty tame. Can I suggest as alternatives: "Bland-Allison was highly unpopular, and it was one of your greatest foes four years ago. Such a quick change of mind is rarely politically profitable, so expect to lose a lot of votes." "The Cross of Gold was considered one of the greatest speeches in history, yet you chop it down so soon? The only crucifixion that will occur is yours (politically that is)." "Capitol Hill is grateful for your deference to the Supreme Court. Your supporters, on the other hand, most definitely are not." "No! No! Thousands of Noes upon you!" - In addition to the bonus from the endorsements, with Carnegie, it should affect Labor by -0.2 with importance of 10 and Borah should affect Currency by 0.5 with importance of 5. Furthermore, why would Tammany help Bryan win PA? It was only in NYC, right? Instead of the Pennsylvanian bonus, maybe implement a McKinley effect by -0.05 in New York, truly cementing Bryan's lead. - Henry Teller didn't actually care that much about tariffs. If anything (which I doubt he should do), he should help Bryan by showing bipartisanship on the ticket. I would just have him with the same response as the other running mates. That's all for Bryan, I'll probably do McKinley tomorrow. 1. Sure, I’ll change that 2. I will change the phrasing of the Tammany answer to include all Democratic political machines 3. Fair enough. |
|
