|
|
Post by Frederick the Great on Apr 3, 2016 10:12:47 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Apr 3, 2016 11:15:11 GMT
they are built for offensive Missions but can be used for defensive missions as well, like you can use the destroyer to defend a port, or a battleship can be used to defend a strategically important coastal city, submarines tho, cannot defend they can be used in offensive operations |
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Apr 3, 2016 11:53:13 GMT
yes you can,I'll add that too bump! Added the "supplying allies via navy" , can be found in the "supplying allies" section |
|
|
|
Post by best75 on Apr 4, 2016 10:17:57 GMT
they are built for offensive Missions but can be used for defensive missions as well, like you can use the destroyer to defend a port, or a battleship can be used to defend a strategically important coastal city, submarines tho, cannot defend they can be used in offensive operations Can navy units be used to blockade areas and prevent enemy reinforcement? |
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Apr 4, 2016 10:29:33 GMT
they are built for offensive Missions but can be used for defensive missions as well, like you can use the destroyer to defend a port, or a battleship can be used to defend a strategically important coastal city, submarines tho, cannot defend they can be used in offensive operations Can navy units be used to blockade areas and prevent enemy reinforcement? interesting question... Yes they can apart from offensive and defensive missions. For example the US embargoes Cuba, or PRC embargoes Japan.. |
|
|
|
Post by Frederick the Great on Apr 4, 2016 10:33:38 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Apr 4, 2016 10:37:03 GMT
yes, battleships can bombard enemies which are trying to hold a "strategically important" port |
|
|
|
Post by best75 on Apr 4, 2016 10:51:17 GMT
yes, battleships can bombard enemies which are trying to hold a "strategically important" port How are losses calculated for the enemy that has been bombarded? Can destroyers bombard the enemy? |
|
|
|
Post by Frederick the Great on Apr 4, 2016 10:53:48 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Apr 4, 2016 11:08:31 GMT
yes, battleships can bombard enemies which are trying to hold a "strategically important" port How are losses calculated for the enemy that has been bombarded? Can destroyers bombard the enemy? now you have taken me to the deep  It won't be much but it'll be maximum two infantries down, as the navy is bombing to help the land units and it isn't a fight as big as the land vs land or sea vs sea, its the navy helping the Army The navy only wins if the army wins (obviously) the enemies win if they occupy the port and the city (since cities come with ports) |
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Apr 4, 2016 15:40:44 GMT
The navy only wins if the army wins (obviously) the enemies win if they occupy the port and the city (since cities come with ports) Even Ankara?  lol. At least if all coastal providences do automatically have all 3 cities holding a port available, it makes things easier to account for even if it's not matching real life. |
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Apr 4, 2016 16:09:02 GMT
The navy only wins if the army wins (obviously) the enemies win if they occupy the port and the city (since cities come with ports) Even Ankara? lol. At least if all coastal providences do automatically have all 3 cities holding a port available, it makes things easier to account for even if it's not matching real life. I have a solution, the navy can only help in cities such as New York or Karachi (or any other major city having a port) |
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Apr 4, 2016 16:34:16 GMT
Then you have to go back to the wikipedia or something to check EVERY city that comes up in a TW. It's up to you, man. I would think it's easier to make it that ALL cities in coastal Providences has a port while inland Providences doesn't, regardless of name of city. That's pretty consistent for a game. Up to you, man.
|
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Apr 4, 2016 16:36:22 GMT
Then you have to go back to the wikipedia or something to check EVERY city that comes up in a TW. It's up to you, man. I would think it's easier to make it that ALL cities in coastal Providences has a port while inland Providences doesn't, regardless of name of city. That's pretty consistent for a game. Up to you, man. I say we end this, navy can't support in attacking land units.... To get the port you have to bring your navy as well (or your ally's) |
|
|
|
Post by best75 on Apr 5, 2016 2:07:33 GMT
Then you have to go back to the wikipedia or something to check EVERY city that comes up in a TW. It's up to you, man. I would think it's easier to make it that ALL cities in coastal Providences has a port while inland Providences doesn't, regardless of name of city. That's pretty consistent for a game. Up to you, man. I say we end this, navy can't support in attacking land units.... To get the port you have to bring your navy as well (or your ally's) So the navy can't effect the dice rolls for land battles than as advantages or disvantages? |
|
lol. At least if all coastal providences do automatically have all 3 cities holding a port available, it makes things easier to account for even if it's not matching real life.
