|
|
Post by Zaxer Unixan on May 20, 2016 8:00:26 GMT
Picking the right units leads to unspeakable power, yet there's always a weaknesses
|
|
|
|
Post by Philip II of Macedon on May 22, 2016 14:13:45 GMT
Erich von Manstein, are you going to be continuing this? If not I will start doing them for you if thats ok.
|
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on May 22, 2016 14:58:57 GMT
Airforce Base 3, after 3-7:
NATO: B52(USA): RADAR ARMOR ENGINE FCS WEAPON INCENDIARY
VS
WTO: Tu22M(USSR): ENGINE FCS COATING ARMOR WEAPON HE-AMMO
Let's compare:
1. Ignore WEAPON, which they share.
2. Tu22M has better survivalability due to COATING and better ARMOR.
3. B52 has better base output because of FCS.
4. B52 has INCENDIARY, while Tu22M has HE-AMMO.
So we get the result:
Tu22M definitely.
Why?
Isn't it wasteful using a bomber to bomb infantry?
|
|
|
|
Post by Singlemalt on May 22, 2016 17:00:40 GMT
Airforce Base 3, after 3-7: NATO: B52(USA): RADAR ARMOR ENGINE FCS WEAPON INCENDIARYVS WTO: Tu22M(USSR): ENGINE FCS COATING ARMOR WEAPON HE-AMMOLet's compare: 1. Ignore WEAPON, which they share. 2. Tu22M has better survivalability due to COATING and better ARMOR. 3. B52 has better base output because of FCS. 4. B52 has INCENDIARY, while Tu22M has HE-AMMO. So we get the result: Tu22M definitely. Why? Isn't it wasteful using a bomber to bomb infantry? I have chosen the b52 with not really too much thoughts at that moment. I agree mostly with your arguments but i must say at aliens campaigns you will use the airforce mainly against basis so fcs is very nice imo... Moreover i think i picked the units mostly on march ability.. For airplanes this is important so maybe get this in the equation too? (Dunno if 1 is better) |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on May 22, 2016 20:51:37 GMT
Airforce Base 3, after 3-7: NATO: B52(USA): RADAR ARMOR ENGINE FCS WEAPON INCENDIARYVS WTO: Tu22M(USSR): ENGINE FCS COATING ARMOR WEAPON HE-AMMOLet's compare: 1. Ignore WEAPON, which they share. 2. Tu22M has better survivalability due to COATING and better ARMOR. 3. B52 has better base output because of FCS. 4. B52 has INCENDIARY, while Tu22M has HE-AMMO. So we get the result: Tu22M definitely. Why? Isn't it wasteful using a bomber to bomb infantry? I have chosen the b52 with not really too much thoughts at that moment. I agree mostly with your arguments but i must say at aliens campaigns you will use the airforce mainly against basis so fcs is very nice imo... Moreover i think i picked the units mostly on march ability.. For airplanes this is important so maybe get this in the equation too? (Dunno if 1 is better) You mean alien bases? True, FCS is great, Leopold2 and AMX56 could have similar output as ZTZ99 with the support of it. But HE-AMMO cannot be replaced easily by FCS, especially while Tu22M has FCS also. |
|
|
|
Post by Singlemalt on May 22, 2016 21:00:40 GMT
Agree again wrong pick from me  |
|
|
|
Post by Zaxer Unixan on May 23, 2016 5:40:18 GMT
Airforce Base 3, after 3-7: NATO: B52(USA): RADAR ARMOR ENGINE FCS WEAPON INCENDIARYVS WTO: Tu22M(USSR): ENGINE FCS COATING ARMOR WEAPON HE-AMMOLet's compare: 1. Ignore WEAPON, which they share. 2. Tu22M has better survivalability due to COATING and better ARMOR. 3. B52 has better base output because of FCS. 4. B52 has INCENDIARY, while Tu22M has HE-AMMO. So we get the result: Tu22M definitely. Why? Isn't it wasteful using a bomber to bomb infantry? I picked B52 for no reason at allXD |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on May 23, 2016 19:43:06 GMT
Airforce Base 3, after 3-7: NATO: B52(USA): RADAR ARMOR ENGINE FCS WEAPON INCENDIARYVS WTO: Tu22M(USSR): ENGINE FCS COATING ARMOR WEAPON HE-AMMOLet's compare: 1. Ignore WEAPON, which they share. 2. Tu22M has better survivalability due to COATING and better ARMOR. 3. B52 has better base output because of FCS. 4. B52 has INCENDIARY, while Tu22M has HE-AMMO. So we get the result: Tu22M definitely. Why? Isn't it wasteful using a bomber to bomb infantry? I picked B52 for no reason at allXD Because it is an American plane?  |
|
|
|
Post by Zaxer Unixan on May 24, 2016 5:30:47 GMT
Nope, for no reason at all........other than the 2-foot B2 model inside my room that is made from metal and wood.......I don't know why?! Haha
|
|
|
|
Post by Maxwell D. Taylor on May 24, 2016 5:36:59 GMT
Nope, for no reason at all........other than the 2-foot B2 model inside my room that is made from metal and wood.......I don't know why?! Haha Do you also have a Dakota c-47 skytrain? I love it! |
|
|
|
Post by Zaxer Unixan on May 24, 2016 5:45:30 GMT
Nope, for no reason at all........other than the 2-foot B2 model inside my room that is made from metal and wood.......I don't know why?! Haha Do you also have a Dakota c-47 skytrain? I love it! Nope, but only pictures of other aircrafts. I habe seen it and it is cool! |
|
|
|
Post by Zaxer Unixan on May 24, 2016 6:21:12 GMT
Blue Dragon or Red Dragon?
I pick Blue Dragon as he has better Coating and Engine.
Did you all notice their art pics in the gift shop, hilarious.
|
|
|
|
Post by itsnotatumor on May 24, 2016 15:09:06 GMT
Blue Dragon or Red Dragon? I pick Blue Dragon as he has better Coating and Engine. Did you all notice their art pics in the gift shop, hilarious. I've go a full review for the dragons on another thread, but didn't want to put it in out of order. |
|
|
|
Post by itsnotatumor on May 24, 2016 15:16:16 GMT
BTW Do you get anymore units after the dragon in Central Asia?
|
|
|
|
Post by Singlemalt on May 24, 2016 15:40:57 GMT
BTW Do you get anymore units after the dragon in Central Asia? Up to now: No |
|
