|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 31, 2016 18:28:15 GMT
1939 so Baltic entente will contain Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Finland and Scandinavian countries are in process of becoming members, but can stay allied countries.
2016 you all know the situation in Europe...
1955 Europe is in total axis control, Asia is mostly Japan, Americas are American Union(AU) and Australia is Australian, Africa is controlled by Italy, Germany and AU. The situation has changed as axis side is losing alliance aligns and the AU is not as united too as in 10years it has come to very big gaps between countries.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bismarck on Mar 31, 2016 19:00:26 GMT
As long as we keep 2016 as apolitical as possible we can avoid salt.
Im tied with 2016 and 1955.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Mar 31, 2016 19:11:10 GMT
2016 if the politics and Salt stay out. 1955 if they don't
|
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Mar 31, 2016 23:24:31 GMT
1939 so Baltic entente will contain Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Finland and Scandinavian countries are in process of becoming members, but can stay allied countries. 2016 you all know the situation in Europe... 1955 Europe is in total axis control, Asia is mostly Japan, Americas are American Union(AU) and Australia is Australian, Africa is controlled by Italy, Germany and AU. The situation has changed as axis side is losing alliance aligns and the AU is not as united too as in 10years it has come to very big gaps between countries. ***The first one would be different from WW2 in 1939 as in Finland goes with Allies instead of Axis, that's it? I could be having the wrong impression here. ***2nd one, eh... Crimea under Russia right? That's risky getting backfire from political issues. ***3rd one, if Axis is the dominant side postwar etc etc... then in this TW, Axis will just crubstomp the already-crippled Allies (unless all nations are not locked in a faction and is allowed to ally or betray whoever?) All 3 to me feels a little meh,whatever. 3rd one does have potential if it's individual nations making their own alliances. ------------------------ Perhaps a 4th option, something in a very different era, very different one than before? 5th Or even North vs South but more focused as in a series of battles such as Gettysburg, Seige of Vicksburg, Victory at Appomattox (the end of the war) etc...? I remembered Vatutin mentioned that he wanted something more of battlegrounds than a worldwide conquest? ------------------------ TL;DR version - maybe 1955, maybe...? |
|
|
|
Post by General William T. Sherman on Apr 1, 2016 0:06:05 GMT
In general, i think we need to begin abolishing the whole faction ordeal. It just adds salt as eventually one faction gets so powerful it is clear who will win. Thus, i believe that it should be every man for themselves at the beginning if we do the Third Option.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 1, 2016 4:24:00 GMT
1939 so Baltic entente will contain Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Finland and Scandinavian countries are in process of becoming members, but can stay allied countries. 2016 you all know the situation in Europe... 1955 Europe is in total axis control, Asia is mostly Japan, Americas are American Union(AU) and Australia is Australian, Africa is controlled by Italy, Germany and AU. The situation has changed as axis side is losing alliance aligns and the AU is not as united too as in 10years it has come to very big gaps between countries. ***The first one would be different from WW2 in 1939 as in Finland goes with Allies instead of Axis, that's it? I could be having the wrong impression here. ***2nd one, eh... Crimea under Russia right? That's risky getting backfire from political issues. ***3rd one, if Axis is the dominant side postwar etc etc... then in this TW, Axis will just crubstomp the already-crippled Allies (unless all nations are not locked in a faction and is allowed to ally or betray whoever?) All 3 to me feels a little meh,whatever. 3rd one does have potential if it's individual nations making their own alliances. ------------------------ Perhaps a 4th option, something in a very different era, very different one than before? 5th Or even North vs South but more focused as in a series of battles such as Gettysburg, Seige of Vicksburg, Victory at Appomattox (the end of the war) etc...? I remembered Vatutin mentioned that he wanted something more of battlegrounds than a worldwide conquest? ------------------------ TL;DR version - maybe 1955, maybe...? 1) no it ads a major power alliance in Europe, which makes it 3side war then. 2) this one contains more than Crimean conflict. 3) as I said both sides are losing unification, so they make new alliances, making it more balanced. 4) I had an idea of northern war, but it really is wrecking to all sides, as there are 8countries |
|
|
|
Post by Bismarck on Apr 1, 2016 11:13:15 GMT
Idc,
I just want a Roman-Galic TW
|
|
|
|
Post by NetherFreek on Apr 1, 2016 16:14:25 GMT
Idc, I just want a Roman-Galic TW maybe alternate roman history, like roman saguntum batavians (holland) frysia (rest of nl) vs gallic tribes (With belgium as the strongest ofc) carthago (punic) germans greece Goths i know they didnt fight at the same time but im trying to fit as many countries as possible |
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Apr 1, 2016 16:46:51 GMT
I'll be happy with anything modern, especially ww2 with twists
|
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Apr 1, 2016 16:47:19 GMT
So far it's 1955 winning
|
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Apr 1, 2016 18:12:35 GMT
Idc, I just want a Roman-Galic TW maybe alternate roman history, like roman saguntum batavians (holland) frysia (rest of nl) vs gallic tribes (With belgium as the strongest ofc) carthago (punic) germans greece Goths i know they didnt fight at the same time but im trying to fit as many countries as possible Actually, if you're doing the Punic wars there's plenty of options as countries to play. Romans (can be spilt in midst of a civil war to incorporate the later Julius Caesar's death spawning 3 factions - Marcus Antonius (Mark Antony & Cleopatra) - Marcus Ledipus (the guy who went down first) - Octavius (defeated Mark Antony and became Augustus the first Roman Empreror) Carthage - of course, with the General Hannibal pwning everything in sight (probably needs a nerf if in a TW lol) Macedonian empire (mostly just Greece and Macedonia, parts of Turkey) Selecudian Empire (Turkey and Iraq, sometimes Israel) Pltomey Empire (Egypt and sometimes Israel) probably the strongest Hellenic empire after Alexander the Great's time. Gauls (France and lowlands in general) Teutons (greater Germany area) Goths (can be spilt to Visgoths and Oostgoths) Celts (Ireland and GB) That's like 12 countries to pick from, and I only alternated the timeline slightly. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 3, 2016 5:07:36 GMT
maybe alternate roman history, like roman saguntum batavians (holland) frysia (rest of nl) vs gallic tribes (With belgium as the strongest ofc) carthago (punic) germans greece Goths i know they didnt fight at the same time but im trying to fit as many countries as possible Actually, if you're doing the Punic wars there's plenty of options as countries to play. Romans (can be spilt in midst of a civil war to incorporate the later Julius Caesar's death spawning 3 factions - Marcus Antonius (Mark Antony & Cleopatra) - Marcus Ledipus (the guy who went down first) - Octavius (defeated Mark Antony and became Augustus the first Roman Empreror) Carthage - of course, with the General Hannibal pwning everything in sight (probably needs a nerf if in a TW lol) Macedonian empire (mostly just Greece and Macedonia, parts of Turkey) Selecudian Empire (Turkey and Iraq, sometimes Israel) Pltomey Empire (Egypt and sometimes Israel) probably the strongest Hellenic empire after Alexander the Great's time. Gauls (France and lowlands in general) Teutons (greater Germany area) Goths (can be spilt to Visgoths and Oostgoths) Celts (Ireland and GB) That's like 12 countries to pick from, and I only alternated the timeline slightly. I could add more, but I don't want to GM that war |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 5, 2016 10:23:38 GMT
I will make story line to 1955
So
Location secret, somewhere in Germany
1944 January 12
Project Atom bomb has reached its final stage, testing. It has been prepared to strike Moscow first.
1944 May 2 Moscow
Germans nuked Kremlin in April 5the and now Ratte tank battalion has conquered today, so USSR has lost the war as Japan conquered Siberia.
1944 May 18th, London
The 2nd Ratte battalion has conquered London today, rest of England has surrendered.
May 28th Europe has fallen.
July 26th Asia has been conquered by Japan
August 29th Africa is controlled by Italy, Germany and other Nazi powers.
September 18th the American Union has been declared by uniting Americas, Australia, and some leftover countries across the globe.
1945 January 15th
Yamamoto conquers most of islands in Pacific.
1945 May 4th
AU has made peace with Nazi without hope of winning war.
1947 August 12
Hitler declares border pact which makes Baltic States free and gives them control over north Europe.
1949 march 12
Hitler dies.
1950 October 13
Mussolini dies.
1951 November 11
The beginning of country crisis in Eurasia.
|
|
|
|
Post by General William T. Sherman on Apr 5, 2016 10:30:15 GMT
But wait, so there are only four available nations?
Edit: Five, sorry, but still!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Apr 5, 2016 10:33:03 GMT
But wait, so there are only four available nations? they should be more than four, shouldn't they The Light Bringer |
|
