|
Post by Conrad von Hotzendorf on Dec 3, 2015 22:38:53 GMT
I don't think you get the joke
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Dec 3, 2015 22:40:35 GMT
Lannes! He has got geography, leadership, mass fire and assault art Geography is apparently useless on Infantry which mean that Lannes has one useless skill. That makes Suvorov better because he has 4 useful skills.
|
|
|
Post by The Last Stand Soldier on Dec 3, 2015 22:50:26 GMT
Infantry Tactics is useful skill? You are shocking me
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Dec 3, 2015 23:02:14 GMT
Suvorov can hold more damage.
Lannes has Leadership&Assault Art.
Both of them has one useless skill(Geography for Lannes, Infantry Tactics for Suvorov).
Lannes can be also a nice cavalry.
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Dec 3, 2015 23:16:26 GMT
How is infantry tactics useless?
|
|
|
Post by The Last Stand Soldier on Dec 3, 2015 23:50:51 GMT
It improves minimal damage, check on when you don't believe
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Dec 3, 2015 23:55:59 GMT
Increasing minimum damage is useful. And even if it wasn't it still does something. So 1/4 of a skill is better than no skill at all.
|
|
|
Post by The Last Stand Soldier on Dec 4, 2015 0:05:47 GMT
You can load game and try once again
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Dec 4, 2015 0:10:02 GMT
Increasing minimum damage is useful. And even if it wasn't it still does something. So 1/4 of a skill is better than no skill at all. See what Chinese Player or wangchengxy said. Maximum could increase 5~7 depends on the line it has. But minimum only increases ONE.
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Dec 4, 2015 0:10:40 GMT
Still better than nothing.
|
|
|
Post by Grouchy on Dec 4, 2015 1:53:35 GMT
Lannes! He has got geography, leadership, mass fire and assault art I would say Suvorov is better in terms of normal damage because he has all the Infantry skills, Lannes only has Mass Fire. Also, Geography is pointless on Infantry since Infantry have it by default. And leadership won't be as useful for infantry since they hardly ever go beyond enemy lines and get flanked/encircled.
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Dec 4, 2015 2:35:02 GMT
Lannes! He has got geography, leadership, mass fire and assault art I would say Suvorov is better in terms of normal damage because he has all the Infantry skills, Lannes only has Mass Fire. Also, Geography is pointless on Infantry since Infantry have it by default. And leadership won't be as useful for infantry since they hardly ever go beyond enemy lines and get flanked/encircled. Leadership should also be useful, because cavalry units could also decrease your morale until the cloud with "?".
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Dec 4, 2015 3:26:20 GMT
Leadership is iffy. It only does something in certain circumstances that are likely to not happen at all.
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Dec 5, 2015 23:21:27 GMT
Lannes! He has got geography, leadership, mass fire and assault art *crashes party* SOMEBODY CALLED ME? ??
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Dec 5, 2015 23:24:39 GMT
and Mountbatten Geography can be used in desert warfare since it slows infantry down by 5% but tbh nobody uses Lannes in N Africa. geography just shows that Lannes can be used for different units while Suvorov is left with only one.
|
|