|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Dec 6, 2015 1:18:33 GMT
Not sure why you would use Lannes on cavalry. Plus you should have infantry items on Lannes so in order to use him on cavalry you would need cavalry items as well. And if you use him on cavalry, his most important skill, Mass Fire will be negated. Is Geography and it's measly movement addition worth it?
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Dec 7, 2015 4:07:00 GMT
Not sure why you would use Lannes on cavalry. Plus you should have infantry items on Lannes so in order to use him on cavalry you would need cavalry items as well. And if you use him on cavalry, his most important skill, Mass Fire will be negated. Is Geography and it's measly movement addition worth it? If you have better cavalry units than infantry units (militia vs. heavy cav.) then I'd rather use him on those units. Mountbatten you are fighting more in Suvorov vs. Lannes than Suvorov. And for speedy campaigns you do need a lot of movement. |
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Dec 7, 2015 4:23:09 GMT
In my experience with using both of them, Suvorov has come out on top 87% of the time.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Dec 7, 2015 4:51:13 GMT
In my experience with using both of them, Suvorov has come out on top 87% of the time. In my experience Lannes was more useful 90% of the time. I would send him into the middle of enemy units with double mgs and he would destroy all of them |
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Dec 7, 2015 4:52:18 GMT
Did you use both at the same time?
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Dec 7, 2015 4:53:40 GMT
Did you use both at the same time? Yes I did use them both in one conquest once and used each one of them in a separate. Lannes seemed better for me so I sticked with him. |
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Dec 7, 2015 4:56:39 GMT
I have an argument ready but I won't push it. You can continue to use Lannes and I will continue to use Suvorov.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Dec 7, 2015 4:57:37 GMT
I have an argument ready but I won't push it. You can continue to use Lannes and I will continue to use Suvorov. Great, now let's focus on Picton vs. Hull. |
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Dec 7, 2015 4:58:41 GMT
It's already been answered
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Dec 7, 2015 4:59:31 GMT
I know I just wanted to get on topic again
|
|
|
|
Post by Ancien Régime on Dec 8, 2015 22:18:53 GMT
Lannes or Suvorov... Wait no I don't want to drag them into this, bickering like an old married couple The way I see it is that Lannes is more versatile, while Suvorov is stronger with just infantry. Lannes is the only general that has both geography and leadership, besides Poniatowski; but Poniatowski has fireproof rather than massfire, which is a lot less useful. So really in my opinion, if you use trainers to get Lannes to 5 stars in other troop types, he'll kick *Auto corrected* with those troops too, not just infantry |
|
|
|
Post by Ancien Régime on Dec 8, 2015 22:24:01 GMT
Oh never mind this has already been discussed... my bad I didn't read all the posts
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Dec 12, 2015 21:44:59 GMT
I personally really like Oudinot, but he is over 900 medals. (Dobeln vs Oudinot is a massive debate that I think has its own thread, but one of those two is the best infantry general medals will get you. If you ask me, Hull>Picton and Oudinot>Dobeln since you will have to buy a snare drum (acts as Mass Fire for all units) eventually.
|
|
.jpg)
