|
|
Post by General William T. Sherman on May 14, 2016 11:54:06 GMT
Hang on, if you built an infantry in one province, you would be gotten six armies, not 49 (Which is an impossible number to get as you gain 3 infantry per province). Also, you only start with a force limit of twenty for both navies and troops. I realize I've kind of failed to mention some rules, unfortunately, but here you go. Could you elaborate on what you mean on the building infantry part? I thought it was you spend 1 turn to build number of infantry equal to number of provinces you own. You get 6 infantry per province but you can only go up the the force limit. Napoleon Bonaparte If the provinces will be an issue, then i can make him give up some provinces later on. For now, he doesnt. NetherFreek yes, we will use that formula. |
|
|
|
TW11
May 14, 2016 12:05:27 GMT
Post by NetherFreek on May 14, 2016 12:05:27 GMT
well, we have the 20 troop limit so his other 29 provinces doesn't count up, and i think its a bit unfair to erase someones provinces, but its your decision ofc
|
|
|
|
TW11
May 14, 2016 12:10:39 GMT
Post by best75 on May 14, 2016 12:10:39 GMT
Could you elaborate on what you mean on the building infantry part? I thought it was you spend 1 turn to build number of infantry equal to number of provinces you own. You get 6 infantry per province but you can only go up the the force limit. Napoleon Bonaparte If the provinces will be an issue, then i can make him give up some provinces later on. For now, he doesnt. NetherFreek yes, we will use that formula. So one turn building infantry you will get number of infantry equal to 6 times the number of provinces you have? |
|
|
|
TW11
May 14, 2016 12:43:58 GMT
Post by General William T. Sherman on May 14, 2016 12:43:58 GMT
You get 6 infantry per province but you can only go up the the force limit. Napoleon Bonaparte If the provinces will be an issue, then i can make him give up some provinces later on. For now, he doesnt. NetherFreek yes, we will use that formula. So one turn building infantry you will get number of infantry equal to 6 times the number of provinces you have? Yes, but due to the force limit, no one will have a freakishly large army compared to others. |
|
|
|
TW11
May 14, 2016 12:46:04 GMT
Post by António Salazar on May 14, 2016 12:46:04 GMT
Netherlands 1-6) Federal Bureaucracy thing GB 1) Build infantry in Multan province. 1 x 49 = 49 armies (Brittania rules the waves!) 2) Munghals gonna Munghal. We attack West-Munghal, we begin with the city A, 7 q2iBljDf3) B, capital 4) C Hang on, if you built an infantry in one province, you would be gotten six armies, not 49 (Which is an impossible number to get as you gain 3 infantry per province). Also, you only start with a force limit of twenty for both navies and troops. I realize I've kind of failed to mention some rules, unfortunately, but here you go. Six? Why six? GB has 49 provinces, and Napoleon Bonaparte I already threw away 10 GB provinces when making maps, we can not make it less. |
|
|
|
Post by General William T. Sherman on May 14, 2016 12:47:50 GMT
well, we have the 20 troop limit so his other 29 provinces doesn't count up, and i think its a bit unfair to erase someones provinces, but its your decision ofc Oh no, I'm not erasing his provinces, but I'm thinking of implementing something like the British commonwealth where areas like Canada, S. Africa and Australia are released as vassals instead (It would be a decision, however). I am also planning on having a commonwealth idea for every major colonial power where they can choose whether to release some areas as vassals or to keep it all for themselves (i.e, maybe the French Commonwealth would have Algeria, Vietnam and Senegal, the German Commonwealth would have Namibia, Tanzania, Kamerun, etc. etc.) Also the examples are based on the historical colonial realm, that doesn't mean that they will be taken by those countries. |
|
|
|
TW11
May 14, 2016 12:48:47 GMT
Post by General William T. Sherman on May 14, 2016 12:48:47 GMT
Hang on, if you built an infantry in one province, you would be gotten six armies, not 49 (Which is an impossible number to get as you gain 3 infantry per province). Also, you only start with a force limit of twenty for both navies and troops. I realize I've kind of failed to mention some rules, unfortunately, but here you go. Six? Why six? GB has 49 provinces, and Napoleon Bonaparte I already threw away 10 GB provinces when making maps, we can not make it less. Well you said you built it in ONE province, which isn't allowed either way. You can only have up to 20 troops rn as well, so you can't have 49 infantry. |
|
|
|
Post by NetherFreek on May 14, 2016 12:53:17 GMT
So if i understand it correctly,
Theres also a province storage of 6.
So he has 6 troops in that province and 14 somewhere else,
If this is correct, the damage calculations need to be redone
|
|
|
|
TW11
May 14, 2016 12:57:41 GMT
Post by General William T. Sherman on May 14, 2016 12:57:41 GMT
So if i understand it correctly, Theres also a province storage of 6. So he has 6 troops in that province and 14 somewhere else, If this is correct, the damage calculations need to be redone Only six troops can be built in each province, so i thought that because he said he was only building it in a province, i thought he was only building it in one province so therefore he would only have six troops. |
|
|
|
TW11
May 14, 2016 13:09:27 GMT
Post by best75 on May 14, 2016 13:09:27 GMT
I am withdrawing my Ethiopia turn while I try to make sense of this.
|
|
|
|
TW11
May 14, 2016 13:42:03 GMT
via mobile
Post by Jean Lannes on May 14, 2016 13:42:03 GMT
Hang on, if you built an infantry in one province, you would be gotten six armies, not 49 (Which is an impossible number to get as you gain 3 infantry per province). Also, you only start with a force limit of twenty for both navies and troops. I realize I've kind of failed to mention some rules, unfortunately, but here you go. eh not to put salt in here but can we get like 20 something provinces for gb? I mean they were ruling the waves and all but no one has 49 (!!) provinces? That's way too much i think. Remember that GB had the largest empire in the whole world though |
|
|
|
TW11
May 14, 2016 13:43:19 GMT
via mobile
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on May 14, 2016 13:43:19 GMT
eh not to put salt in here but can we get like 20 something provinces for gb? I mean they were ruling the waves and all but no one has 49 (!!) provinces? That's way too much i think. Remember that GB had the largest empire in the whole world though well we need a clear statement from Dom Pedro since a few things are unclear here, also I like the Commonwealth idea. |
|
|
|
TW11
May 14, 2016 13:47:38 GMT
via mobile
Post by Jean Lannes on May 14, 2016 13:47:38 GMT
Remember that GB had the largest empire in the whole world though well we need a clear statement from Dom Pedro since a few things are unclear here, also I like the Commonwealth idea. Yes I like it too but wasn't Pola-.... Oh You mean the other one. Silly me playing too much EU4 |
|
|
|
TW11
May 14, 2016 13:49:37 GMT
via mobile
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on May 14, 2016 13:49:37 GMT
well we need a clear statement from Dom Pedro since a few things are unclear here, also I like the Commonwealth idea. Yes I like it too but wasn't Pola-.... Oh You mean the other one. Silly me playing too much EU4 not Poland bruh, the others. Let's all go this in the random area I think? |
|
|
|
Post by General William T. Sherman on May 14, 2016 14:00:32 GMT
His provinces remain untouched, he still has 49 provinces.
|
|
